Continuum approach to discreteness

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2002, Pages

  Kevrekidis, P G ^a,b   Kevrekidis, I G ^c   Bishop, A R ^a   Titi, E S ^d  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c Princeton University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUUM APPROXIMATION; CONTINUUM EQUATIONS; DISCRETENESS; PADÉ APPROXIMATION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; HAMILTONIANS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; OSCILLATIONS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

CONTINUUM MECHANICS;

EID: 41349084168     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046613     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. S.P. Dawson, J. Keizer, and I.E. Pearson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6060 (1999).
2. J.P. Keener, J. Theor. Biol. 148, 49 (1991).
3. J.P. Laplante and T. Erneux, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 4931 (1992).
4. A.V. Ustinov, T. Doderer, I.V. Vernik, N.F. Pedersen, R.P Huebener, and V.A. Oboznov, Physica D 68, 41 (1993).
5. D.N. Christodoulides and R.I. Joseph, Opt. Lett. 13, 794 (1988).
6. B.L. Swanson et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3288 (1999).
7. M. Peyrard and A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2755 (1989).
8. M. Peyrard and M.D. Kruskal, Physica D 14, 88 (1984).
9. Y. Ishimori and T. Munakata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 3367 (1982).
10. J.A. Combs and S. Yip, Phys. Rev. B 28, 6873 (1983).
11. J.P. Keener, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) I. Appl. Math. 47, 556 (1987).
12. O.M. Braun and Yu.S. Kivshar, Phys. Rep. 306, 1 (1998).
13. D. Hennig and G.P. Tsironis, Phys. Rep. 307, 334 (1999).
14. Physica D 119, (1999), special volume edited by S. Flach and R. S. MacKay.
15. S. Flach and C.R. Willis, Phys. Rep. 295, 181 (1998).
16. P.C. Kevrekidis, K.Ø. Rasmussen, and A.R. Bishop, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 2833 (2001).
17. R.S. MacKay and S. Aubry, Nonlinearity 7, 1623 (1994).
18. S. Aubry, Physica D 103, 201 (1997).
19. N.J. Balmforth, R.V. Craster, and P.O. Kevrekidis, Physica D 135, 212 (2000).
20. P.G. Kevrekidis and C.K.R.T. Jones, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3114 (2000).
21. T. Kapitula, P.G. Kevrekidis, and C.K.R.T. Jones, Phys. Rev. E 63, 036602 (2001).
22. T. Kapitula and P.G. Kevrekidis, Nonlinearity 14, 533 (2001).
23. Yu.S. Kivshar, D.E. Pelinovsky, T. Cretegny, and M. Peyrard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5032 (1998).
24. P. G. Kevrekidis, I. G. Kevrekidis, and B. A. Malomed, J. Phys. A 35, 267 (2002).
25. P.G. Kevrekidis, C.K.R.T. Jones, and T. Kapitula, Phys. Lett. A 269, 120 (2000).
26. P.G. Kevrekidis and M.I. Weinstein, Physica D 142, 113 (2000).
27. P. G. Kevrekidis and M. I. Weinstein (unpublished).
28. J.P. Keener, Physica D 136, 1 (2000).
29. M. Johansson and S. Aubry, Phys. Rev. E 61, 5864 (2000).
30. P.G. Kevrekidis, I.G. Kevrekidis, and A.R. Bishop, Phys. Lett. A 279, 361 (2001).
31. P.G. Kevrekidis, K.Ø. Rasmussen, and A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2006 (2000).
32. P.G. Kevrekidis, K.Ø. Rasmussen, and A.R. Bishop, Math. Comput. Simul. 55, 449 (2001).
33. P.G. Kevrekidis, K.Ø. Rasmussen, and A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4652 (2000).
34. R. Boesch and C.R. Willis, Phys. Rev. B 39, 361 (1989); 42, 371 (1990); R. Boesch, P. Standoff, and C.R. Willis, ibid. 38, 6713 (1988); R. Boesch, C.R. Willis, and M. El-Batanouny, ibid. 40, 2284 (1989).
35. R. Boesch and C.R. Willis, Phys. Rev. B 39, 361 (1989); 42, 371 (1990); R. Boesch, P. Standoff, and C.R. Willis, ibid. 38, 6713 (1988); R. Boesch, C.R. Willis, and M. El-Batanouny, ibid. 40, 2284 (1989).
36. R. Boesch and C.R. Willis, Phys. Rev. B 39, 361 (1989); 42, 371 (1990); R. Boesch, P. Standoff, and C.R. Willis, ibid. 38, 6713 (1988); R. Boesch, C.R. Willis, and M. El-Batanouny, ibid. 40, 2284 (1989).
37. R. Boesch and C.R. Willis, Phys. Rev. B 39, 361 (1989); 42, 371 (1990); R. Boesch, P. Standoff, and C.R. Willis, ibid. 38, 6713 (1988); R. Boesch, C.R. Willis, and M. El-Batanouny, ibid. 40, 2284 (1989).
38. A. Bensoussan, J.L. Lions and G. Papanicolaou, Asymptotic Analysis for Periodic Structures, Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1978).
39. P.G. Kevrekidis and I.G. Kevrekidis, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056624 (2001).
40. P. Rosenau, Phys. Lett. A 118, 222 (1986).
41. P. Rosenau, Phys. Rev. B 36, 5868 (1987).
42. O.M. Braun, Phys. Rev. E 62, 7315 (2000).
43. Padé Apprvximants Method and Its Applications to Mechanics, edited by H. Cabannes (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976).
44. C. Elphick, E. Meron, and E.A. Spiegel, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math. 50, 490 (1990).
45. Ya. Frenkel and T. Kontorova, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 13, 137 (1939).
46. E.N. Pelinovsky and S.K. Shavratsky, Physica D 3, 410 (1981).
47. P.L. Christiansen, Y.G. Gaididei, F.G. Mertens, and S.F. Mingaleev, Eur. Phys. J. B 19, 545 (2001).
48. E. Hairer,S. P. Norsett, and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993).
49. See, i.e., Eqs. (15a)-(15c) of P. Rosenau, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7193 (1989); Eqs. (3c) and (3d) ibid. 46, R7371 (1992); as well as the work of C.R. Doering, P.S. Hagan, and P. Rosenau, ibid. 36, 985 (1987).
50. See, i.e., Eqs. (15a)-(15c) of P. Rosenau, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7193 (1989); Eqs. (3c) and (3d) ibid. 46, R7371 (1992); as well as the work of C.R. Doering, P.S. Hagan, and P. Rosenau, ibid. 36, 985 (1987).
51. See, i.e., Eqs. (15a)-(15c) of P. Rosenau, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7193 (1989); Eqs. (3c) and (3d) ibid. 46, R7371 (1992); as well as the work of C.R. Doering, P.S. Hagan, and P. Rosenau, ibid. 36, 985 (1987).
52. M.D. Kruskal and N.J. Zabusky, J. Math. Phys. 5, 231 (1964).
53. S. Pnevmatikos, N. Flytzanis, and M. Remoissenet, Phys. Rev. B 33, 2308 (1986).
54. N. Flytzanis, St. Pnevmatikos, and M. Remoissenet, J. Phys. C 18, 4603 (1985).
55. A. Champneys and Yu.S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2551 (2000).
56. Recently, it was brought to our attention by P. Rosenau that he considered expressions of the form of Eq. (19) in Prog. Theor. Phys. 79, 1028 (1988). The latter considerations were not motivated by continued fraction generalizations but rather by the necessity to treat anomalous effects in the dispersion relation arising, for example, in the case where next nearest neighbor interactions are present. In this case, the regularization led to equations with sixth-order mixed derivatives (fourth order in space and second order in time).
57. D. Cai, A.R. Bishop, and N. Gronbech-Jensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 591 (1994).
58. J. Hirth and J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations (Wiley, New York, 1982).
59. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Aspects of Classical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989).
60. D. Cai, A.R. Bishop, and N. Gronbech-Jensen, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4131 (1996).
61. T. Kapitula, P.G. Kevrekidis, and B.A. Malomed, Phys. Rev. E 63, 036604 (2001).
62. A. Trombettoni and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2353 (2001).
63. R. Scharf and A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. A 43, 6535 (1991).
64. D. Cai, A.R. Bishop, N. Gronbech-Jensen, and M. Salerno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1186 (1995).
65. J. Feldmann et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 7252 (1992).
66. M. Holthaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 351 (1992).
67. B.P. Anderson and M.A. Kasevich, Science 282, 1686 (1998).
68. I.G. Kevrekidis, B. Nicolaenko, and J.C. Scovel, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math. 50, 760 (1990).
69. S. Heinze, G. Papanicolaou, and A. Stevens, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62, 129 (2001).
70. S. Flach and K. Kladko, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2912 (1996).