Biometric calculation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery following pupil dilatation

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 156-158

  Bansal, Shveta ^a,c   Quah, Say A ^b   Turpin, Tim ^b   Batterbury, Mark ^b  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Biometry; Pupil dilatation

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; LENS POWER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MYDRIASIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SAFETY; REFRACTION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

BIOMETRY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MYDRIATICS; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PUPIL; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 41249103707     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01700.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Olsen T, Thim K, Croydon L. Accuracy of newer generation IOL power calculation formulas in long and short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991; 17: 187-93.
2. Lam AK. A handheld keratometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 222-30.
3. Story PG, Weisher PD. Axial length and the average ophthalmologist is biometry useful? Ophthalmic Surg 1989; 20: 327-31.
4. Rose LT, Moshegov CN. Comparison of the Zeiss IOL Master and applanation A-scan ultrasound: Biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 121-4.
5. Kielhorn I, Rajan MS, Tesha PM, Subryan VR, Bell JA. Clinical assessment of the Zeiss IOL Master. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 518-22.
6. Shammas HJ. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 1984; 10: 444-7.
7. Watson A, Robyn A. Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999; 27: 49.
8. Olson T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 125-9.
9. Eleftheriadis H. IOL Master biometry: Refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 960-3.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307-10.
11. Butcher JM, O'Brien C. The reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements. Eye 1991; 5: 708-11.
12. Raj PS, Ilango B, Watson A. Measurement of axial length in the calculation of intraocular lens power. Eye 1998; 12: 227-9.
13. Hennessy MP, Franzco CDG, Chan DG. Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 2195-8.
14. Sadiq S, McElvanney A. Pupillary dilation and axial length measurements for preoperative assessment of intraocular lens power. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996; 6: 147-9.
15. Heatley CJ, Whitefield LA, Hugkulstone CE. Effect of pupil dilation on the accuracy of the IOL Master. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1993-6.