Notes on interval estimation of risk difference in stratified noncompliance randomized trials: A Monte Carlo evaluation

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 4091-4103

  Lui, Kung Jong ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RISK ANALYSIS;

ASYMPTOTIC INTERVALS; MONTE CARLO EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL (RCT); RISK DIFFERENCE (RD);

RANDOM VARIABLES;

EID: 41249085362     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angrist J.D., Imbens G.W., and Rubin D.B. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (1996) 444-455
2. Bernhard G., and Compagnone D. Binary data in prerandomized designs. Biometrical Journal 31 (1989) 29-33
3. Brunner E., and Neumann N. On the mathematical basis of Zelen's prerandomized designs. Methods of Information in Medicine 24 (1985) 120-130
4. Casella G., and Berger R.L. Statistical Inference (1990), Belmont, Duxbury, CA
5. Cochran W.G. Sampling Techniques (1977), Wiley, New York
6. Edwardes M.D. A confidence interval for P r (X < Y) - P r (X > Y) estimated from simple cluster samples. Biometrics 51 (1995) 571-578
7. Fisher L.D., Dixon D.O., Herson J., Frankowski R., Hearron M., and Peace K.E. Intention to treat in clinical trials. In: Peach K.E. (Ed). Statistical Issues in Drug Research and Development (1990), Marcel Dekker, New York 331-350
8. Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd edn (1981), Wiley, New York
9. Fleiss J.L. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments (1986), Wiley, New York
10. Frangakis C.E., and Rubin D.B. Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 86 (1999) 365-379
11. Lui K.-J. Notes on estimation of the general odds ratio and the general risk difference for paired-sample data. Biometrical Journal 44 (2002) 957-968
12. Lui K.-J. Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk (2004), Wiley, New York
13. Lui K.-J. Interval estimation of the difference in proportions under m-to-one matching. Statistics in Medicine 24 (2005) 1765-1776
14. Lui K.-J. A note on hypothesis test in binary data under the single-consent randomized design. Drug Information Journal 40 (2006) 219-227
15. Lui K.-J. Interval estimation of the risk difference in non-compliance randomized trials with repeated binary measurements. Statistics in Medicine 26 (2007) 3140-3156
16. Mark S.D., and Robins J.M. A method for the analysis of randomized trials with compliance information: An application to the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 14 (1993) 79-97
17. Matsui S. Stratified analysis in randomized trials with noncompliance. Biometrics 61 (2005) 816-823
18. Matsuyama Y. Correcting for non-compliance of repeated binary outcomes in randomized clinical trials: Randomized analysis approach. Statistics in Medicine 21 (2002) 675-687
19. Multiple Risk factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Multiple risk factor intervention trial: Risk factor changes and mortality results. Journal of the American Medical Association 248 (1982) 1465-1477
20. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Language Version. 1st edn (1990), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina
21. Sato T. A further look at the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel risk difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 16 (1995) 359-361
22. Sato T. Sample size calculations with compliance information. Statistics in Medicine 19 (2000) 2689-2697
23. Sato T. A method for the analysis of repeated binary outcomes in randomized Clinical trials with non-compliance. Statistics in Medicine 20 (2001) 2761-2774
24. Sommer A., and Zeger S.L. On estimating efficacy from clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 10 (1991) 45-52
25. Walter S.D., Guyatt G., Montori V.M., Cook R., and Prasad K. A new preference-based analysis for randomized trials can estimate treatment acceptability and effect in compliant patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 (2006) 685-696
26. Zhou X.H., and Li S.M. ITT analysis of randomized encouragement design studies with missing data. Statistics in Medicine 25 (2006) 2737-2761