The need for adequate ethical guidelines for qualitative health research

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 303-311

  Guerriero, Iara Coelho Zito ^a   Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi ^b  

^a Secretaria Municipal de Saude de Sao Paulo   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Ethics in research; Ethics in research in Human and Social Sciences; Health services research; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; BRAZIL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REVIEW;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BRAZIL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 41149181179     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232008000200002     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Ministry of Health. National Health Council. Resolution number 196; of 10th October 1996, which regulates guidelines and research norms involving human beings [online]. [cited 2006 Jan 4]. Available from: http://conselho.saude.gov. br/docs/Resolucoes/Reso196.doc
2. a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes; São Paulo: Universidade São Francisco; 2003.
3. nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 1-28.
4. Nunes ED. A metodologia qualitativa em saúde: dilemas e desafios. In: Barros NF, Cecatti JG, Turato ER. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Campinas: UNICAMP; 2005. p. 15-24.
5. Victora CG, Knauth DR, Hassen MNA. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Porto Alegre: Tomo Editorial; 2000.
6. a ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; Rio de Janeiro: ABRASCO; 1994.
7. nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.
8. Bateson G. Mente e natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves; 1986.
9. a ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva; 2000.
10. nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 157-162.
11. nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 133-155.
12. a ed. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget; 1995.
13. Nelson CH, McPherson DH. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm? NCEHR Commun 2004; 12(2):11-22.
14. Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946-April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949-1953. [cited 2006 Jan 04]. Available from: http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/Nuremberg_Code.htm
15. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendation guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects, 1989. In: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: WHO/CIOMS; 1993. p. 47-50.
16. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies [online]. Geneva; 1991. [cited 2005 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.cioms.ch/frame 1991 texts of guidelines.htm
17. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS; 1993.
18. The National Commission for the Protection on Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Washington, D.C; 1979. [cited 2004 Jan 25]. Available from: http://ohrs.od.nih.gov/mpa/belmont.php 3
19. Morin E. O Método 6: Ética. Porto Alegre: Sulina; 2005.
20. Caroso C. A imagem e a ética na encruzilhada das ciências. In: Victora C, Oliven RG, Maciel ME, Oro AP, organizadores. Antropologia e Ética - debate atual no Brasil. Niterói: EdUFF; 2004. p. 137-150.
21. Schmidt MLS. Pesquisa qualitativa, alteridades e comunidades interpretativas. Imaginário 2003; 9:57-64.
22. Figueiredo LC. Investigação em Psicologia Clínica. In: Psicologia no Brasil: direções epistemológicas. Brasília: Conselho Federal de Psicologia; 1995.
23. nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 163-188.
24. Guerriero ICZ. Aspectos éticos das pesquisas qualitativas em saúde [doctorate dissertation thesis] São Paulo (SP): Faculdade de Saúde Pública/Universidade do Estado de São Paulo; 2006.