Effective mitigation of debris flows at Lemon Dam, La Plata County, Colorado

Geomorphology

Volumn 96, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 366-377

  deWolfe, Victor G ^a   Santi, Paul M ^a   Ey, J ^b   Gartner, Joseph E ^c  

^a Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

^b Florida Water Conservancy District   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Debris flow; Erosion; Mitigation; Mulch; Seeding

Indexed keywords

DAM CONSTRUCTION; DEBRIS FLOW; DRAINAGE BASIN; EROSION CONTROL; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HILLSLOPE; MITIGATION; MULCH; SEDIMENTATION; SEEDING; WILDFIRE;

COLORADO; LA PLATA COUNTY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CITRUS LIMON;

EID: 41149180290     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amaranthus, M.P., 1989. Effect of grass seeding and fertilizing on surface erosion in two intensely burned sites in southwest Oregon. In: N.H. Berg (Technical coordinator), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-109, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Berkeley, California.
2. BAER (Burned Area Emergency Response) Team, 2002a. Coal Seam Fire: Burned Area Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation Plan. USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Geological Survey, 250 pp.
3. BAER (Burned Area Emergency Response) Team, 2002b. Missionary Ridge Complex, Durango, Colorado June-July 2002: Burned Area Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation Plan. USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Geological Survey, 251 pp.
4. Bautista S., Bellot J., and Vallejo V.R. Mulching treatment for postfire soil conservation in a semiarid ecosystem. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 10 (1996) 235-242
5. Beyers J.L. Postfire seeding for erosion control: effectiveness and impacts on native plant communities. USDA Forest Service. Conservation Biology 18 4 (2004) 947-956
6. Beyers J.L., Wakeman C.D., Wohlgemuth P.M., and Conard S.G. Effects of postfire grass seeding on native vegetation in southern California chaparral. Proceedings, 19th Annual Forest Vegetation Management Conference: Wildfire Rehabilitation. Forest Vegetation Management Conference, Redding, California (1998) 52-64
7. Buxton H., and Caruccio F.T. Evaluation of selective erosion control techniques, Piedmont Region of S.E. United States. Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA-600/2-79-124, Cincinnati, OH (1979) 107 pp.
8. Cannon S.H., and Gartner J.E. Runoff and erosion generated debris flows from recently burned basins. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, Salt Lake City, UT (2005)
9. Cannon S.H., Gartner J.E., Holland-Sears A., Thurston B.M., and Gleason J.A. Debris flow response of basins burned by the 2002 Coal Seam and Missionary Ridge fires, Colorado. In: Boyer D.D., Santi P.M., and Rogers W.P. (Eds). Engineering Geology in Colorado-Contributions, Trends, and Case Histories, AEG Special Publication 15. Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication vol. 55 (2003) 31 pp., on CD-ROM
10. Chatwin S.C., Howes D.E., Schwab J.W., and Swanston D.N. A Guide for Management of Landslide-Prone Terrain in the Pacific Northwest. Land Management, Handbook. 2nd ed. vol. 18 (1994), B.C. Ministry of Forestry, Victoria, B.C. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Lmh/LMH-09.pdf 220 pp. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Lmh/LMH-09.pdf. Accessed on 2/12/2005
11. Chelan County Public Utility District, 2001. Erosion Control Techniques and Permitting, Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Project. FERC Project No. 637, P.U.D #1, Chelan County Power, Wenatchee, Washington (revised draft).
12. Dean, A.E., 2001. Evaluating effectiveness of watershed conservation treatments applied after the Cerro Grande Fire, Los Alamos, New Mexico. MS thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.
13. deWolfe, V.G., 2006. An evaluation of erosion control methods after wildfire in debris-flow prone areas. M.S. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
14. Duffy J.D., and DeNatale J.D. Debris flow mitigation using flexible barriers. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Highway Geology Symposium (1996), Wyoming Department of Transportation, Cody, WY 243-252
15. Eisbacher G.H., and Clague J.J. Destructive mass movements in high mountains: hazard and management. Geological Survey of Canada Paper vol. 84-16 (1984) 230 pp.
16. Gartner, J.D., 2003. Erosion after wildfire: the effectiveness of log erosion barriers. M.S. Thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 70 pp.
17. Gartner, J.E., 2005. Relations between debris-flow volumes generated from recently burned basins and basin morphology, triggering storm rainfall and material properties. M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 87 pp.
18. Gautier C.R. Sedimentation in burned watersheds: is emergency revegetation justified?. Water Resources Bulletin 19 (1983) 793-802
19. Geier-Hayes K. The impact of post-fire seeded grasses on native vegetative communities in central Idaho. In: Greenlee J.M. (Ed). Proceedings of the First Conference on Fire Effects on Rare and Endangered Species and Habitats (1997), International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairfield, Washington 19-26
20. Government of Japan. Basics of planning the measures against debris flows and planning countermeasure facilities against debris flow. Ministry of Construction (1984) 9 pp.
21. Heierli W., and Merk A. Barriers for erosion control of mountain torrents. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Erosion, Debris Flow and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan (1985) 375-380
22. Hubbert K.R. Treatment effectiveness monitoring For Southern California Wildfires: 2003 to 2004. The Cedar, Grand Prix/Old, Piru, and Padua Fires. Hubbert and Associates (2005) 216 pp.
23. Kay B.L. Straw as an erosion control mulch. Agronomy Progress Report No. 140. University of California Agricultural Experiment Station, Davis, CA (1983) 11 pp.
24. Leys E., and Hagen G. Design of gravity dams against water pressure and earth pressure. Imst Regional Construction Office, Torrent and Avalanche Control, Austria (1971) 39 pp. (in German)
25. McDonald G.N., and Giraud R.E. Fire-related debris flows east of Santaquin and Spring Lake, Utah County, Utah. Utah Geological Survey Technical Report 02-09 (2002) 15 pp.
26. Miles S.R. Listing of BAER treatments: cost, risk, effectiveness, production rates and applications. Burned Area Emergency Response Lesson (2005). http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/baer/4g.html http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/baer/4g.html, Accessed on 2/10/2005.
27. Miles, S.R., Haskins, D.M., Ranken, D.W., 1989. Emergency burn rehabilitation; cost, risk, and effectiveness. In: Berg, N.H. (Technical Coordinator), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management, October 26-28, 1988, Sacramento, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-109. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, pp. 97-102. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr109/psw_gtr109b.pdf. Accessed on 10/24/2005.
28. Moench R., and Fusaro J. Soil erosion control after wildfire. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, no. 6.308 (2002). http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/NATRES/06308.html http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/NATRES/06308.html. Accessed on 2/10/2005.
29. Reihsen G., and Harrison L.J. HEC 9 debris control structures. Federal highway administration. Hydraulics Branch (1971). http://www.bossintl.com/products/dpdf/files/ftp/dir/01383/pdf/hec09.pdf http://www.bossintl.com/products/dpdf/files/ftp/dir/01383/pdf/hec09.pdf. Accessed on 6/30/2006.
30. Robichaud P.R. Measurement of post-fire hillslope erosion to evaluate and model rehabilitation treatment effectiveness and recovery. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14 (2005) 475-485
31. Robichaud P.R. Personal Communication (2006), USDA Forest Service, Moscow, ID
32. Robichaud, P.R., Beyers, J.L., Neary, D.G., 2000. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Postfire Rehabilitation Treatments. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-63. Fort Collins, CO, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 85 pp. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr63.pdf. Accessed on 10/14/2005.
33. Robichaud P.R., Lillybridge T.R., and Wagenbrenner J.W. Effects of postfire seeding and fertilizing on hillslope erosion in north-central Washington, USA. Catena 67 1 (2006) 56-67
34. Roby, K.B., 1989. Watershed response and recovery from the Will Fire: ten years of observation. In Berg, N.H. (Technical coordinator), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-109, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, pp. 131-136.
35. Santi P.M., deWolfe V.A., Higgins J.D., Cannon S.H., Gartner J.E., and Santi P.M. Sources of debris flow material in burned areas. Geomorphology 96 (2008) 310-321 (this volume)
36. Smith R. Personal Communication (2004), USDA Forest Service, Pagosa Springs, CO
37. Taskey, R.D., Curtis, C.L., Stone, J., 1989. Wildfire, ryegrass seeding, and watershed rehabilitation. In Berg, N.H. (Technical coordinator), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire and Watershed Management. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-109, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, pp. 149-161.
38. Thommen R.A., and Duffy J.D. Testing and application of flexible wire rope netting barriers to retain mud and debris flow, Geobrugg Technical Bulletin #10. Geobrugg Protection Systems, Romanshorn, Switzerland (1997) 8 pp.
39. Thurber Consultants Ltd. Debris torrents, a review of mitigative measures. Report to B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Highways, Victoria, B.C (1984) 32 pp.
40. VanDine D.F. Debris Flow Control Structures for Forest Engineering. Working Paper 08/1996 (1996), British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program, Victoria, B.C. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Wp/Wp22.htm 68 pp. www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Wp/Wp22.htm. Accessed on 2/8/2005
41. Wagenbrenner J.W., MacDonald L.H., and Rough D. Effectiveness of three post-fire rehabilitation treatments in the Colorado Front Range. Hydrological Processes 20 14 (2006) 2989-3006
42. Wells W.D. The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in Southern California. In: Costa J.E., and Wieczorek G.G. (Eds). Debris Flow/ Avalanches: Process, Recognition, and Mitigation. Reviews in Engineering Geology vol. VII (1987), Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO 105-114
43. Whittaker J.G., Schaelchli U., and Jaeggi M.N.R. Design problems with torrent check dams in Switzerland. Proceedings of the International Symposium: Erosion, Debris Flow and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan (1985) 387-394
44. Wohlgemuth P.M., Beyers J.L., Wakeman C.D., and Conard S.G. Effects of fire and grass seeding on soil erosion in southern California chaparral. Proceedings, of the 19th Annual Forest Vegetation Management Conference: Wildfire Rehabilitation, Redding, CA (1998) 41-51
45. Wohlgemuth, P.M., Beyers, J.L., Conard, S.G., 1999. Postfire hillslope erosion in southern California chaparral: a case study of prescribed fire as a sediment management tool. In: Gonzalez-Caban, A., Omi, P.N. (Technical coordinators), Proceedings of a Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning, and Policy: Bottom Lines, General technical report PSW-GTR-173, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp. 269-276.
46. Wohlgemuth P.M., Hubbert K.R., and Robichaud P.R. The effects of log erosion barriers on post-fire hydrologic response and sediment yield in small forested watersheds, southern California. Hydrological Processes 15 (2001) 3053-3066
47. Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Florida Watershed Post-Fire Rehabilitation Project, Section 319 Grant Report (2005), Wright Water Engineers, Inc., Durango, CO