What Every Graduating Medical Student Should Know About Urology: The Stakeholder Viewpoint

Urology

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 549-553

  Kerfoot, B Price ^a,b   Turek, Paul J ^c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; TESTIS TORSION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE INCONTINENCE; UROLITHIASIS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; HEALTH EDUCATORS; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PHYSICIAN EXECUTIVES; UNITED STATES; UROLOGY;

EID: 41149145342     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kerfoot B.P., Masser B.A., and Dewolf W.C. The continued decline of formal urological education of medical students in the United States: does it matter?. J Urol 175 (2006) 2243-2247 discussion 2247-2248
2. Burns E., Flocks R.H., Higgins C.C., et al. The present status of undergraduate urologic training. J Urol 76 (1956) 309-322
3. Rous S.N., and Mendelson M. A report on the present status of undergraduate urologic teaching in medical schools and some resulting recommendations. J Urol 119 (1978) 303-304
4. Rous S.N., and Lancaster C. The current status of undergraduate urological teaching. J Urol 139 (1988) 1160-1162
5. Benson G.S. The decline of urological education in United States medical schools. J Urol 152 (1994) 169-170
6. Litwin M.S., Saigal C.S., and Beerbohm E.M. The burden of urologic diseases in America. J Urol 173 (2005) 1065-1066
7. Newton D.A., and Grayson M.S. Trends in career choice by US medical school graduates. JAMA 290 (2003) 1179-1182
8. Rapp D.E., Lyon M.B., Orvieto M.A., et al. The core learning objectives education model: an approach to the teaching of core concepts in the clinical clerkship. Can J Urol 12 (2005) 2849-2855
9. Kerfoot B.P., Baker H., Volkan K., et al. Development and initial evaluation of a novel urology curriculum for medical students. J Urol 172 (2004) 278-281
10. Rapp D.E., Gong E.M., Reynolds W.S., et al. Assessment of the core learning objectives curriculum for the urology clerkship. J Urol 178 (2007) 2114-2118
11. Teichman J.M., and Richards J. Multimedia to teach urology to medical students. Urology 53 (1999) 267-270
12. Elves A.W., Ahmed M., and Abrams P. Computer-assisted learning; experience at the Bristol Urological Institute in the teaching of urology. Br J Urol 80 Suppl 3 (1997) 59-62
13. Kerfoot B.P., Baker H., Jackson T.L., et al. A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of adjuvant web-based teaching to medical students. Acad Med 81 (2006) 224-230
14. Kerfoot B.P., Baker H.E., Koch M.O., et al. Randomized, controlled trial of spaced education to urology residents in the United States and Canada. J Urol 177 (2007) 1481-1487
15. American Board of Urology. 2007 Information for Applicants for Recertification. http://www.abu.org/RCTBook2007.pdf Accessed October 26, 2007
16. Teichman J.M., Weiss B.D., and Solomon D. Urological needs assessment for primary care practice: implications for undergraduate medical education. J Urol 161 (1999) 1282-1285