Individual acoustic monitoring of the European Eagle Owl Bubo bubo

Ibis

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 279-287

  Grava, Thibault ^a   Mathevon, Nicolas ^a,b   Place, Emelyne ^a   Balluet, Patrick ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c Ligue Pour la Protection des Oiseaux du Département de la Loire   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Acoustic monitoring; Individual identification; Vocal signature

Indexed keywords

BIRD; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SITE FIDELITY; VOCALIZATION;

AVES; BUBO BUBO; STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 41149138758     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: 1474919X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00776.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aubin, T. 1994. syntana: a software for the synthesis and analysis of animals sounds. Bioacoustics 4 : 80 81.
2. Aubin, T. Jouventin, P. 2002. How to identify vocally a kin in a crowd? The penguin model. Adv. Stud. Behav. 31 : 243 277.
3. Balluet, P. Faure, R. 2004. Typologie des sites occupés par le Grand-Duc d'Europe Bubo bubo dans le nord-est du Massif Central (département de la Loire). Nos Oiseaux 51 : 211 226.
4. Baptista, L.F. Gaunt, S.L. 1997. Bioacoustics as a tool in conservation studies. In Clemons, J.R. Buchholz, R. (eds) Behavioural Approaches to Conservation in the Wild : 212 242. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5. Black, J.M. 1996. Partnerships in Birds: the Study of Monogamy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
6. Cochet, G. 2006. Le Grand-duc d'Europe. Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé.
7. Cramp, S. (ed.) 1985. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 4. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
8. Delgado, M.M. Penteriani, V. 2007. Vocal behaviour and neighbour spatial arrangement during vocal displays in eagle owls (Bubo bubo). J. Zool., Lond. 271 : 3 10.
9. Delport, W., Kemp, A.C. Ferguson, W.H. 2002. Vocal identification of individual African Wood Owls Strix woodfordii: a technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency. Ibis 144 : 30 39.
10. Gilbert, G., McGregor, P.K. Tyler, G. 1994. Vocal individuality as a census tool: practical considerations illustrated by a study of two rare species. J. Field Ornithol. 65 : 335 348.
11. Gilbert, G., Tyler, G.A. Smith, K.W. 2002. Local annual survival of booming male Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris in Britain, in the period 1990-1999. Ibis 144 : 51 61.
12. Hartwig, S. 2005. Individual acoustic identification as a non-invasive conservation tool: an approach to the conservation of the African wild dog Lycaon pictus. Bioacoustics 15 : 35 50.
13. Hopp, S.L., Owren, M.J. Evans, C.S. 1998. Animal Acoustic Communication: Sound Analysis and Research Methods. Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
14. Jenkins, J.M. Jackman, R.E. 1993. Mate and nest fidelity in a resident population of Bald Eagles. The Condor 95 : 1053 1056.
15. Lengagne, T. 2001. Temporal stability in the individual features in the calls of Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo). Behaviour 138 : 1407 1419.
16. Mathevon, N., Charrier, I. Jouventin, P. 2003. Potential of individual recognition in acoustic signals: A comparative study of two gulls with different nesting patterns. C. R. Biologies 326 : 329 337.
17. Mbu-Nyamsi, R.G., Aubin, T. Brémond, J.C. 1994. On the extraction of some time dependant parameters of an acoustic signal by means of the analytic signal concept. Its application to animal sound study. Bioacoustics 5 : 187 203.
18. McGregor, P.K. Peake, T.M. 1998. The role of individual identification in conservation biology. In Caro, T. (ed.) Behavioural Ecology and Conservation Biology : 31 55. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
19. McGregor, P.K., Peake, T.M. Gilbert, G. 2000. Communication behaviour and conservation. In Sutherland, W.J. Gosling, M. (eds) Behaviour and Conservation : 261 280. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20. Peake, T.M. McGregor, P.K. 2001. Corncrake Crex crex census estimates: a conservation application of vocal individuality. Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 24 : 81 90.
21. Peake, T.M., McGregor, P.K., Smith, K.W., Tyler, G., Gilbert, G. Green, R.E. 1998. Individuality in Corncrake Crex crex vocalisations. Ibis 140 : 120 127.
22. Penteriani, V. 2002. Variation in the function of Eagle Owl vocal behaviour: territorial defence and intra-pair communication? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14 : 275 281.
23. Penteriani, V. 2003. Breeding density affects the honesty of bird vocal displays as possible indicators of male/territory quality. Ibis 145 : 127 135.
24. Pimentel, R.A. Frey, D.F. 1978. Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis. In Colgan, P.W. (ed.) Quantitative Ethology : 247 274. New York : John Wiley.
25. Robisson, P., Aubin, T. Brémond, J.C. 1993. Individuality in the voice of the Emperor Penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology 94 : 279 290.
26. Sokal, R.R. Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. New York : Freeman and company.
27. Svensson, L. Grant, P. 1999. Le Guide Ornitho. Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé.
28. Terry, A.M.R. McGregor, P.K. 2002. Census and monitoring based on individually identifiable vocalizations: the role of neural networks. Anim. Conserv. 5 : 103 111.
29. Terry, A.M.R., Peake, T. McGregor, P.K. 2005. The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Frontiers in Zoology 2 : 10.
30. Vignal, C., Mathevon, N. Mottin, S. 2004. Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. Nature 431 : 448 451.
31. Warkentin, I.G. Hernandez, D. 1995. The conservation implications of site fidelity: a case study involving nearctic-neotropical migrant songbirds wintering in a Costa Rican mangrove. Biol. Conserv. 77 : 143 150.