An overview of industrial software documentation practice

Proceedings - International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, SCCC

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 179-186

  Visconti, M ^a   Cook, C R ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Capability maturity model; Character generation; Computer industry; Documentation; Feedback; Government; Programming; Software maintenance; Software quality; Software testing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; FEEDBACK; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE TESTING; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODELS; CHARACTER GENERATION; COMPUTER INDUSTRY; GOVERNMENT; SOFTWARE QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 41149138288     PISSN: 15224902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SCCC.2002.1173192     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. D. Card, F. McGarry and G. Page. Evaluating software engineering technologies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(7) (1987) 845-851.
2. C. Cook and M. Visconti. Documentation is important. CrossTalk, 7(11) (1994) 26-30.
3. C. Cook and M. Visconti. New and improved documentation process model, in Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1996 (PNSQC, Portland, 1996), pp. 364-380.
4. W. Humphrey. Managing the software process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1989).
5. B. Lientz and E. Swanson. Problems in applications software maintenance. Communications of the ACM , 24(11) (1981) 763-769.
6. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. The Capability Maturity Model guidelines for improving the software process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1995).
7. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1. EEE Software, 10(4) (1993) 18-27.
8. J. Pence and S. Hon III. Building software quality into telecommunications network systems. Quality Progress, (October 1993) 95-97.
9. H. Rombach and V. Basili. Quantitative assessment of maintenance: an industrial case study, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Austin, Texas, September 1987 (IEEE, Washington, 1987), pp. 134-144.
10. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A software system documentation process maturity approach to software quality, in Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1993 (PNSQC, Portland, 1993), pp. 257-271.
11. M. Visconti and C. Cook. Evolution of a maturity model - critical evaluation and lessons learned. Software Quality Journal 7, (1998) 223-237.
12. C. Cook and M. Visconti. What to do after the assessment report?, in Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1999 (PNSQC, Portland, 1999), pp. 214-228.
13. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model for software process maturity. Technical Report OSU/CS-02-60-02 (OSU/CS, Corvallis, Oregon, 2002).