Test suite prioritization by interaction coverage

DoSTA 2007: Workshop on Domain-Specific Approaches to Software Test Automation - In conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE Joint Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-7

  Bryce, Renée C ^a   Memon, Atif M ^b  

^a University of Nevada Las Vegas   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Combinatorial interaction testing; Covering arrays; Event driven software; t way interaction coverage; Test suite prioritization

Indexed keywords

COMBINATORIAL INTERACTION TESTING; COVERING ARRAYS; EVENT DRIVEN SOFTWARE; TEST SUITE PRIORITIZATION;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 41149130107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1294921.1294922     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. R. C. Bryce and C. J. Colbourn. The density algorithm for pairwise interaction testing. Journal of Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability, to appear.
2. R. C. Bryce, A. Rajan, and M. P.E. Heimdahl. Interaction testing in model-based development: Effect on model-coverage. Proc. of the 13 Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conf., pages 258-269, Dec. 2006.
3. C. J. Colbourn. Combinatorial aspects of covering arrays. Le Matematicke (Catania), 58:121-167, 2004.
4. S. Elbaum, A. Malishevsky, and G. Rothermel. Test case prioritization: A family of empirical studies. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 18(2):159-182, 2002.
5. S. Elbaum, G. Rothermel, S. Kanduri, and A. Malishevsky. Selecting a cost-effective test case prioritization technique. Software Quality Journal, 12(3):185-210, 2004.
6. D. R. Kuhn, D. R. Wallace, and A. M. Gallo. Software fault interactions and implications for software testing. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 30(6):418-421, Oct. 2004.
7. Atif M. Memon. An event-flow model of gui-based applications for testing. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 2007.
8. Atif M. Memon, Mary Lou Soffa, and Martha E. Pollack. Coverage criteria for GUI testing. In ESEC/FSE-9: Proc. of the 8th European software engineering conf. held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT Int. symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 256-267, 2001.
9. G. Rothermel, R. H. Untch, C. Chu, and M. J. Harrold. Prioritizing test cases for regression testing. ACM Trans. on Software. Engineering and Methodology, 27(10):929-948, 2001.
10. A. Srivastava and J. Thiagarajan. Effectively prioritizing tests in development environment. In Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 97-106, Jul. 2002.
11. Kristen R. Walcott, Mary Lou Soffa, Gregory M. Kapfhammer, and Robert S. Roos. Timeaware test suite prioritization. In Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 1-12, Jul. 2006.
12. L. White. Regression testing of gui event interactions. In Proc. of the Int. Conf., on Software Maintenance, pages 350-358, Nov. 1996.
13. L. White and H. Almezen. Generating test cases for gui responsibilities using complete interaction sequences. In Proc. of the Interactional Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, pages 110-121, 2000.
14. Qing Xie and Atif M. Memon. Studying the characteristics of a 'good' GUI test suite. In Proc. of the 17th IEEE Int. Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2006.
15. C. Yilmaz, M. B. Cohen, and A. Porter. Covering arrays for efficient fault characterization in complex configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 31(1):20-34, Jan. 2006.
16. Xun Yuan and Atif M. Memon. Using GUI run-time state as feedback to generate test cases. In Proc. of the 29th Int. Conf., on Software Engineering, May 2007.