Are we willing to pay enough to 'back the bid'?: Valuing the intangible impacts of London's bid to host the 2012 summer olympic games

Urban Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 419-444

  Atkinson, Giles ^a   Mourato, Susana ^b   Szymanski, Stefan ^c   Ozdemiroglu, Ece ^d  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Economics for the Environment Consulting (eftec) Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; OLYMPIC GAMES; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 41149127896     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098007085971     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alberini, A. and Kahn, J. (2006) Handbook on Contingent Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Barberan, R. and Lazaro, A. (2006) Choice modeling at the 'market stall': Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation, Ecological Economics, 60(4), pp. 743-751.
3. Andersen, A. (Ed.) (1999) Economic impact study of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Centre for Regional Economic Research, University of Tasmania.
4. Arup (2002) London Olympics 2012 costs and benefits. Arup, London.
5. Baade, R. (1996) Professional sports as catalysts for metropolitan economic development, Journal of Urban Affairs, 18, pp. 1-17.
6. Baade, R. and Matheson, V. (2002) Bidding for the Olympics: Fool's gold?, in: C. Barros, M. Ibrahim and S. Szymanski (Eds) Transatlantic Sports, pp. 127-151. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7. Bateman, I. J. and Willis, K. G. (Eds) (1999) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bateman, I., Carson, R.T., Day, B. et al. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Blake, A. (2005) The economic impact of the Olympics. Report for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport and the London Development Agency, London.
10. Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R. and Weimer, D.L. (2006) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Boyle, K.J. and Bergstrom, J.C. (1999) Doubt, doubts, and doubters: The genesis of a new research agenda?, in: I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, pp. 183-206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Brunet, F. (1993) Economy of the 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games. International Olympic Committee, Lausanne.
13. Brunet, F. (1995) An economic analysis of the Barcelona 92 Olympic Games: Resources, financing and impact. Centre d'Estudis Olímpics i de l'Esport, Universitat Autìnoma de Barcelona.
14. Cameron, T.A. and Huppert, D.D. (1989) OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17(3), pp. 230-246.
15. Carlino, G.A. and Coulson, N.E. (1989) Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL, Journal of Urban Economics, 56, pp. 25-50.
16. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E. and Meade, N.F. (2001) Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, pp. 173-210.
17. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E., Martin, K.M. and Wright, J.L. (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: Comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods, Land Economics, 72, pp. 80-99.
18. Chalip, L. (2003) Tourism and the Olympic Games, in: M. Moragas, C. Kennett and N. Puig (Eds) The Legacy of the Olympic Games (1984-2000), pp. 195-204. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.
19. Champ, P.A., Bishop, R.C., Brown, T.C. and McCollum,D.W. (1997) Using donation mechanisms to value non-use benefits from public goods, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, pp. 151-162.
20. Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J. and Brown, T. C. (Eds) (2003) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Champ, P.A., Flores, N.E., Brown, T.C. and Chivers, J. (2002) Contingent valuation and incentives, Land Economics, 78(4), pp. 591-604.
22. Coates, D. and Humphreys, B. (1999) The growth effects of sport franchises, stadia and arenas, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), pp. 601-624.
23. Coates, D. and Humphreys, B. (2001) The economic consequences of professional sports strikes and lockouts, Southern Economic Journal, 67(3), pp. 737-747.
24. Coates, D. and Humphreys, B. (2003 a) Professional sports facilities, franchises and urban economic development, Public Finance and Management, 3(3), pp. 335-357.
25. Coates, D. and Humphreys, B. (2003 b) The effect of professional sports on the earnings of individuals: Evidence from microeconomic data. Working Paper 03-104, Economics Department, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
26. Crompton, J.L. (1995) Economic impact analysis of sports facilities and events: Eleven sources of misapplication, Journal of Sport Management, 9(1), pp. 14-35.
27. Crompton, J.L. (2001) Public subsidies to professional team sport facilities in the USA, in: C. Gratton and I. P. Henry (Eds) Sport in the City: The Role of Sport in Economic and Social Regeneration, pp. 15-34. London: Routledge.
28. Crompton, J.L. (2004) Beyond economic impact: An alternative rationale for the public subsidy of major league sports facilities, Journal of Sport Management, 18, pp. 40-58.
29. Cummings, R.G. and Taylor, L.O. (1999) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method, American Economic Review, 89, pp. 649-665.
30. Cummings, R., Brookshire, D. and Schulze, W. (Eds) (1986) Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
31. Diamond, P.A. and Hausman, J.A. (1994) Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 45-64.
32. Dickie, M., Fisher, A. and Gerking, S. (1987) Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, pp. 69-75.
33. eftec (Economics for the Environment Consultancy Ltd) (2004) Olympic games impact study: Stated preference analysis. Report to the Department of Culture, Media and Sports, London.
34. ERA (Economics Research Associates) (1981) Report on costs, revenues, and economic activity which will be generated by conduct of the 1984 Summer Olympic Games in the City of Los Angeles. ERA, Los Angeles.
35. Farber, S.C., Costanza, R. and Wilson, M.A. (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 41, pp. 375-392.
36. Fischoff, B. and Furby, L. (1988) Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to the contingent valuation of visibility, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, pp. 147-184.
37. Gerald, C. and Coulson, N.E. (2002) Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL. Working Paper No. 02-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
38. Goulder, L.H. and Donald, K. (1997) Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods, in: G. C. Daily (Ed.) Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, pp. 23-47. Washington, DC: Island Press.
39. Gowdy, J. (2004) The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy, Land Economics, 80(2), pp. 239-257.
40. Hanemann, W.M. (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 19-43.
41. Hanemann, W.M. and Kanninen, B. (1999) The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data, in: I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Harrison, G.W. and Rutström, E.E. (forthcoming) Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods, in: V. L. Smith (Ed.) Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics. New York: Elsevier Science.
43. Hausman, J. (Ed.) (1993) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
44. Humphreys, J. and Plummer, M. (1995) The economic impact of hosting the 1996 Summer Olympics. Centre d'Estudis Olímpics i de l'Esport Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
45. Johnson, B.K. and Whitehead, J.C. (2000) The value of public goods from sports stadiums: The CVM approach, Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(1), pp. 48-58.
46. Johnson, B.K., Groothuis, P.A. and Whitehead, J.C. (2002) The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team: The CVM approach, Journal of Sports Economics, 2(1), pp. 6-21.
47. Kim, J.-G., Rhee, S.W., Yu, J.-C. et al. (1989) Impact of the Seoul Olympic Games on national development. Korea Development Institute, Seoul.
48. List, J.A. (2001) Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 1498-1507.
49. List, J.A. and Gallet, C. (2001) What experimental protocols influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, pp. 241-254.
50. Lusk, J.L. (2003) Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness to pay for golden rice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, pp. 840-856.
51. Milgrom, P. (1993) Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method, in: J. A. Hausman (Ed.) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 417-442. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
52. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
53. Murphy, J.J., Allen, P.G., Stevens, T.H. and Weatherhead, D. (2005) A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, pp. 313-325.
54. Neill, H.R., Cummings, R.G., Ganderton, P.T. et al. (1994) Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments, Land Economics, 70, pp. 145-154.
55. Noll, R. and Zimbalist, A. (Eds) (1997) Sports, Jobs and Taxes: The Economic Impact of Sports Teams and Stadiums. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
56. Paradiso, M. and Antonella, T. (2001) The effect of knowledge on the disparity between hypothetical and real willingness to pay, Applied Economics, 33, pp. 1359-1364.
57. Pearce, D.W., Atkinson, G. and Mourato, S. (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
58. Porter, P. (1999) Mega sports events as municipal investments: A critique of impact analysis, in: J. Fizel, E. Gustafson and L. Hadley (Eds) Sports Economics: Current Research, pp. 61-73. Westport, CT: Praeger.
59. Portney, P.R. (1994) The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 3-18.
60. Preuss, H. (2004) The Economics of Staging the Olympics: A Comparison of the Games 1972-2008. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
61. Sagoff, M. (1994) Should preferences count?, Land Economics, 70, pp. 127-144.
62. Sagoff, M. (1998) Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: A look beyond contingent valuation, Ecological Economics, 24, pp. 213-230.
63. Schkade, D.A. and Payne, J.W. (1993) Where do the numbers come from? How people respond to contingent valuation questions, in: J. A. Hausman (Ed.) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 271-304. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
64. Siegfried, J. and Zimbalist, A. (2000) The economics of sports facilities and their communities, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), pp. 95-114.
65. Smith, V.K. (2006) Fifty years of contingent valuation, in: A. Alberini and J. Kahn (Eds) Handbook on Contingent Valuation, pp. 7-56. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
66. Sugden, R. (1999) Alternatives to the neoclassical theory of choice, in: I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, pp. 152-180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.