Genotypic evaluation of accessions and individual selection in Stylosanthes spp. by simulated BLUP method

Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 253-260

  Resende, Rosangela Maria Simeão ^a   De Resende, Marcos Deon Vilela ^a   Laura, Valdemir Antônio ^a   Jank, Liana ^a   Do Valle, Cacilda Borges ^a  

^a EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

BLUP REML; Forage legume; Plant breeding; Stylosanthes capitata; Stylosanthes guianensis

Indexed keywords

STYLOSANTHES; STYLOSANTHES CAPITATA; STYLOSANTHES GUIANENSIS;

EID: 41149125108     PISSN: 15187853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12702/1984-7033.v06n04a01     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andrade RP, Karia CT and Ramos AKB (2004) Stylosanthes as a forage legume at its centre of diversity. In: Chakraborty S (ed.) High-yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR, Canberra, p. 39-50.
2. Barbosa MHP and Pinto CABP (1998) Análise dialélica parcial entre cultivares de batata nacionais e introduzidas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 33: 307-320.
3. Bradshaw JE, Dale MFB and Mackay GR (2003) Use of mid-parent values and progeny tests to increase the efficiency of potato breeding for combined processing quality and disease and pest resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 36-42.
4. Brummer EB (2005) Thoughts on breeding for increased forage yield. Proceedings of the international grassland congress, 20. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Dublin, p. 63.
5. Cameron DF, Trevorrow RM and Liu CJ (1997) Recent advances in studies of anthracnose of Stylosanthes. II. Approaches to breeding for anthracnose resistance in Stylosanthes in Australia. Tropical Grasslands 31: 424-429.
6. Chakraborty S (ed.) (2004) High-yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR, Canberra, 268p.
7. Chang YS and Milligan SB (1992) Estimating the potential of sugarcane families to produce elite genotypes using univariate cross prediction methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 662-671.
8. Fernandes CD, Chakraborty S, Grof B, Purcino HMA, Nascimento MDSB, Charchar MJA, Verzignassi JR and Marcelino Sobrinho J (2004) Regional evaluation of Stylosanthes germplasm in Brazil. In: Chakraborty S (ed.) High-yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR, Canberra, p. 127-134.
9. Kimbeng CA and Cox MC (2003) Early generation selection of sugarcane families and clones in Australia: a review. Journal of the American Society of Sugarcane Technologists 23: 20-39.
10. Mariotti JA, Cuenya MI and Garcia de Salas MB (1999) Análisis de componentes familiares y intra-familiares en progenies derivadas de combinaciones biparentales de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.). Revista Industrial y Agrícola de Tucumán 76: 55-60.
11. Martins PS and Vello NA (1981) Performance and variability of agronomic characters in populations of Stylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.) Sw. In: Proceedings of the international grassland congress, 14. Westview Press, Lexington, p. 196-198.
12. Mothci EP, Amaral JAM ands Santos RD (1979) Levantamento de reconhecimento detalhado e aptidão agrícola dos solos da área do centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Gado de Corte, Mato Grosso do Sul. Embrapa-SNLCS, Rio de Janeiro, 225p. (Boletim Técnico, 59)
13. Resende MDV (2002) Genética biométrica e estatística no melhoramento de plantas perenes. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, 975p.
14. Resende MDV and Barbosa MHP (2006) Selection via simulated individual BLUP based on family genotypic effects in sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41: 421-429.
15. Shelton HM, Franzel S and Peters M (2005) Adoption of tropical legume technology around the world: analysis of success. In: Mcgilloway DA (ed.) Grassland: a global resource. Academic Press, Wageningen, p. 149-166.