|
Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 77-80
|
Against the proposition: For the diagnosis of viral infections, commercial assays provide more reliable results than do in-house assays
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DNA;
IMMUNOGLOBULIN G;
VIRUS RNA;
ASSAY;
CELL CULTURE;
CEREBROSPINAL FLUID;
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS;
ENTEROVIRUS;
HEPATITIS B VIRUS;
HEPATITIS C VIRUS;
HERPES ZOSTER;
HUMAN;
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1;
IN VITRO STUDY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LABORATORY TEST;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
QUALITY CONTROL;
REVIEW;
RUBELLA;
VARICELLA ZOSTER VIRUS;
VIRUS INFECTION;
GENETIC TECHNIQUES;
HUMANS;
LABORATORIES;
LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES;
QUALITY CONTROL;
REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
VIROLOGY;
VIRUS DISEASES;
|
EID: 41149122676
PISSN: 10529276
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.562 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (8)
|