Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based telesurgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 10-14

  Nguan, C Y ^a   Morady, R ^a   Wang, C ^b   Harrison, D ^a   Browning, D ^a   Rayman, R ^a   Luke, P P W ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b BELL CANADA   (Canada)

^c LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Internet protocol; Pyeloplasty; Robotics; Satellite; Telesurgery

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

CLINICAL APPLICATION; INTERNET PROTOCOL NETWORKS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NETWORK-BASED; PERFORMANCE; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; SATELLITE NETWORK; SURGICAL ROBOTICS; TELESURGERY;

SATELLITES;

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INTERNET; LAPAROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICS; SWINE; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELESURGERY;

EID: 41149112996     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.173     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Badani KK, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience. World J Urol 2006; 24: 148-151.
2. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738-1741.
3. Chin JL, Luke PP, Pautler SE. Initial experience with laparoscopic prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system. Can Urol Ass J 2007; 9: 97-101.
4. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 413: 379-380.
5. Fabrizio MD, Lee BR, Chan DY, et al. Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation. J Endourol 2000; 14: 133-138.
6. Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, et al. Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based internet performance. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 111-116.
7. Nguan C, Kwan K, Al Omar M, Beasley KA, Luke PP. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms. Can J Urol 2007; 14: 3571-3576.
8. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 2005; 66(5 suppl): 101-104.
9. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001; 58: 893-898.
10. Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, et al. Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120: 807-809.
11. Anvari M, Broderick T, Stein H, et al. The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10: 93-99.
12. Thompson JM, Ottensmeyer MP, Sheridan TB. Human factors in telesurgery: effects of time delay and asynchrony in video and control feedback with local manipulative assistance. Telemed J 1999; 5: 129-137.
13. Bove P, Stoianovici D, Micali S, et al. Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures. J Endourol 2003; 17: 137-142.