A note on multigroup comparisons using SAS PROC CALIS

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 154-173

  Jones Farmer, L Allison ^a   Pitts, Jennifer P ^b   Rainer, R Kelly ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University System of Georgia

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2-GROUP; COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION; EQUAL SIZES; FIT INDEXES; GOODNESS-OF-FIT STATISTICS; MULTI-GROUP; SAMPLE SIZES; STANDARD ERRORS;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 41149109692     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705510701758414     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. Chicago: Smallwaters.
2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, F. J. C. (2002). EQS 6 for Windows guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375-377.
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.
6. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272-300.
8. Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 63-73.
9. Fan, X., & Fan, X. (2005). Using SAS for Monte Carlo simulation research in SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 299-333.
10. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344.
11. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-31.
12. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
13. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
14. Marcoulides, G. A., & Hershberger, S. L. (1997). Multivariate statistical methods: A first course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. McDonald, R. P. (1989). An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality. Journal of Classification, 6, 97-103.
16. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural, equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
17. Niehoff, B., & Moorman, R. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
18. Pitts, J. P. (2006). The effects of managerial communication and justice perceptions on employee commitment to organizational change: A mixed method field study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn. University, Auburn, AL.
19. SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3 [Software manual]. Cary, NC: Author.
20. Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 411-419.
21. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literatures: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
22. Wilson, E. B., & Hilferty, M. M. (1931). The distribution of chi-square. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, 17, 694.