An innovative enterostomal therapy nurse model of community wound care delivery: A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 169-183

  Harris, Connie ^a,c   Shannon, Ronald ^b  

^a Ostomy and Wounds CarePartners et NOW Division   (Canada)

^b Freelance Healthcare Economist   (United States)

^c Ostomy and Wounds CarePartners et NOW Division   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING DISCIPLINE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN CARE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

AGED; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MODELS, NURSING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ONTARIO; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN CARE; SPECIALTIES, NURSING; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 41149106915     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.WON.0000313639.37247.c0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Knight L. Personal discussion re: Visit volume and characteristics for Care Partners visiting nursing agencies in the province of Ontario. 2004
2. Heater BS, Becker AM, Olson RK. Nursing interventions and patient outcomes: a meta-analysis of studies. Nurs Res. 1988; 37(5):303-307.
3. Waterloo Region Community Care Access Centre. CCAC090 Enterostomal Therapy (ET) Consultation Request form Mar 3/05.
4. Orridge C, Purbhoo D. Wound Care: A Guiding Framework: A Joint CCAC Initiative in Collaboration With Their Service Partners. Toronto, Ontario: Wound Review Project, Toronto CCAC; 2004.
5. Expectations of Registered Nurses and Registered Practical Nurses. The College of Nurses of Ontario Web site. http://www.cno.org/international_en/ intro/expectations.htm. Accessed December 18, 2007.
6. Robson MC, Maggi SP, Smith PD, et al. Ease of wound closure as an endpoint of treatment efficacy. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(2):90-96.
7. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete Observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481.
8. Polansky M, van Rijswijk L. Utilizing survival analysis techniques in chronic wound healing studies. Wounds. 1994; 6:150-158.
9. Peto R, Pike C, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient; part II: analysis and examples. Br J Cancer. 1977;35:1-39.
10. TreeAge Software, Inc. http://www.treeage.com.
11. Richter A, Mauskopf J. Monte Carlo simulation in health care models. Value Health. 1998;1(1):84-85.
12. Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, et al. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices - budget impact analysis. Value Health. 2007;10(5):336-347.
13. SPSS, Inc. http://SPSS.com.
14. Sussman C, Bates-Jensen B. Assessment of the skin and wound. In: Wound Care a Collaborative Practice Manual. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:106.
15. Arnold N, Weir D. Retrospective analysis of healing in wounds cared for by ET nurses versus staff nurses in a home setting. J Wound Ostomy Contin Nurses. 1994;21(4):156-160.
16. White R. Delayed wound healing: who, what, when and why? Nurs Stand Suppl. 2006:47-54.
17. Dicenso A, Cullum N, Ciliska D. Implementing evidence-based nursing: Some misconceptions. Evidence-Based Nursing. 1998, 1 April:38-40.
18. Harrison MB. Queen's Nursing 301 Course, Professional Practice Framework.
19. Harrison MB. Paper presented at: Evidence Based Nursing: Theory Science and Practice Workshop; December 2003; Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.