A context driven architecture for cognitive radio nodes

Wireless Personal Communications

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 423-434

  Balamuralidhar, P ^a   Prasad, Ramjee ^b  

^a TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES   (India)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cognitive radio; Context awareness; Ontology; Process algebra; Semantic web

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; VERIFICATION;

COGNITIVE RADIO NODES; COLLABORATIVE ADAPTATIONS; CONTEXT AWARENESS; PROCESS ALGEBRA;

RADIO SYSTEMS;

EID: 41149099923     PISSN: 09296212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-008-9480-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Mitola III J. and Maguire G. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 6(4): 13-18
2. Nehaniv, C. L. (1997). Algebraic models for understanding: coordinate systems and cognitive empowerment, ct, p. 147, Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology (CT '97), 1997, http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10. 1109/CT.1997.617694
3. Sontag E.D. (2004). Some new directions in control theory inspired by systems biology. Systems Biology. IEE Proceedings 1(1): 9-18
4. Ledeczi, A., & Karsai, G. (2000). Synthesis of self-adaptive software. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference. CD-ROM Reference 10.0304, Big Sky, MT, March 2000.
5. Wang Y. (2002). The real time process algebra (RTPA). Annals of Software Engineering 14: 235-274
6. Wang Y. (2003). Using process algebra to describe human and software behaviors. Brain and Mind 4: 199-213
7. Lopez, N., Nunez, M., & Pelayo, F. L. (2004). STOPA: A stochastic process algebra for the formal representation of cognitive systems. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics 2004, 16-17 Aug. 2004, (pp. 64-73).
8. Atallah, L., & Eberbach, E. (2005). The Calculus process algebra of bounded rational agents applied to selected problems in bioinformatics. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems CIRAS'05. Singapore, Dec. 13-16, 2005.
9. McGuinness, D. L., & Harmelen F. (2004). OWL web ontology language overview, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
10. SWRLSubmission. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
11. Mei, J., & Paslaru Bontas, E. (2005). Reasoning paradigms for SWRL-enabled ontologies. Proceedings of International Workshop on Protege with Rules. July 2005, Madrid, Spain.
12. Devitt, A., Danev, B., & Matusikova, K. (2006). Constructing Bayesian networks automatically using ontologies. Proceedings of Formal Ontologies Meet Industry (FOMI). 14 Dec. 2006, Trento, Italy.
13. Wang, X. H., Gu, T., Zhang, D. Q., & Pung, H. K. (2004). Ontology-based context modelling and reasoning using OWL. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications- Percom 2004, 14-17 March. 2004, (pp. 18-22).
14. Henricksen, K., Livingstone, S., & Indulska, J. (2004). Towards a hybrid approach to context modelling, reasoning, and interoperation. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning And Management. UbiComp'2004.