Program portfolio selection for reducing prioritized security risks

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 190, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 268-276

  Glickman, Theodore S ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure; Homeland security; Integer programming; Lexicographic optimization; OR in government; Portfolio selection; Risk management; Risk reduction

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; HOMELAND SECURITY; OR IN GOVERNMENT; PORTFOLIO SELECTIONS;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 41149098607     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baker N.R. R&D project selection models: An assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-21 (1974) 165-171
2. Baker N.R., and Freeland J. Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods. Management Science 21 (1975) 1164-1175
3. Beged-Dov A.G. Optimal assignment of research and development projects in a large company using an integer programming model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-12 (1965) 138-142
4. Benjamin C.O. A linear goal-programming model for public-sector project selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society 36 (1985) 13-23
5. Faisst, U., Prokein, O., 2005. An optimization model for the management of security risks in banking companies. Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC'05), 266-273.
6. Intersociety Working Group, 2006. AAAS Report XXXI: Research and Development FY 2007. AAAS Publication Number 06-1A. Washington, DC.
7. Mehr A.F., and Tumer I.Y. Risk-based decision-making for managing resources during the design of complex space exploration systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 128 (2006) 1014-1022
8. Mukherjee K., and Bera A. Application of goal programming in project selection decision - A case study from the Indian coal mining industry. European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 18-25
9. Sherali H.D., Alameddine A.A., and Glickman T.S. Biconvex models and algorithms for risk management problems. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences 14 3-4 (1994) 197-228
10. Shou Y.Y., and Guo B. A lexicographic approach for selecting R&D projects with resource constraints. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference Proceedings 2 (2004) 799-802
11. Stummer, C., Sun, M., 2005. A tabu search heuristic for R&D project portfolio selection. In: Proceedings of the 6th Metaheuristics International Conference, Vienna, pp. 847-852.
12. US Department of Homeland Security, 2004. Securing Our Homeland: US Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan. Washington, DC.
13. US General Accountability Office, 2005. Further Actions Needed to Coordinate Federal Agencies' Facility Protection Efforts and Promote Key Practices. Report GAO-05-49. Washington, DC.
14. White House Office of Homeland Security, 2002. National Strategy for Homeland Security. Washington, DC.
15. Wilamowsky Y., Epstein S., and Dickman B. Optimization in multiple-objective linear programming problems with pre-emptive priorities. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 4 (1990) 351-356 also: related viewpoints in Journal of the Operational Research Society 42(6) (1991) 519-522