New visualization tools: Computer vision and ultrasound for MIS navigation

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-31

  Kilian, P ^a   Plaskos, C ^a   Parratte, S ^b,f,g   Argenson, J N A ^b   Stindel, E ^c,d   Tonetti, J ^e   Lavallee S ^a  

^a PRAXIM Medivision   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c BREST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE   (France)

^e GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^g HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

Author keywords

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery; Hip replacement; Ultrasound registration

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; COMPUTER VISION; HIP PROSTHESES; ORTHOPEDICS;

BONE SURFACE; COMPUTER ASSISTED; COMPUTER-ASSISTED ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; DIGITISATION; HIP REPLACEMENTS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MORPHING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND REGISTRATION; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

ULTRASONICS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CADAVER; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DIGITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILIAC CREST; IMPLANT; KNEE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 41149087800     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.178     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Grutzner PA, Hebecker A, Waelti H, et al. Clinical study for registration-free 3D-navigation with the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D mobile C-arm. Electromedica 2003; 71(S1): 7-16.
2. Lavallée S, Bainville E, Bricault I. An overview of computer-integrated surgery and therapy. In 3D Imaging in Medicine, Udupa J, Herman G (eds). CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2000; 207-263.
3. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Eid A. Computer assisted spine surgery. Clin Orthop 1997; 337: 86-96.
4. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, et al. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 433: 152-159.
5. Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P, et al. Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aid Surg 2002; 7: 156-168.
6. Perrin N, Stindel E, Roux C. Bone Morphing vs. freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10(5-6): 301-309.
7. Barbe C, Troccaz J, Mazier B, et al. Using 2.5D echography in computer assisted spine surgery. Proceedings of 15th IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 1993; 160-161.
8. Kowal J, Amstutz CA, Nolte LP. On B-mode ultrasound-based registration for computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 47.
9. Barbe C, Troccaz J, Mazier B, et al. Using 2.5D echography in computer assisted surgery. Proceedings 15th IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference 1993; 15: 160-161.
10. Ault T, Siegel MW. Frameless patient registration using ultrasonic imaging: a preliminary study. J Img G Surg 1995; 1: 94-102.
11. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Lavallée S, et al. Percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop 1998; 354: 103-110.
12. Moulder C, Sati M, Wentkowski MV, et al. A transcutaneous bone digitizer for minimally invasive registration in orthopedics: a real-time focused ultrasound beam approach. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8(3): 120-128.
13. Chan CS, Edwards PJ, Hawkes DJ. Integration of ultrasound-based registration with statistical shape models for computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. SPIE Med Imaging 2003; 5032: 414-424.
14. Ionescu G. Segmentation and Registration of Ultrasound Images by Using Physiological and Morphological Knowledge. PhD Thesis, Grenoble University, 1999; [in French].
15. Amin DV. Ultrasound Registration for Surgical Navigation. PhD Thesis, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2001.
16. Wolf A, Digioia AM III, Mor A, Jaramaz B. Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplast clinical orthopaedics & related research. Clin Orthop 2005; 437: 132-137.
17. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, et al. Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(4): 204-211.
18. Alfiansyah A, Streichenberger R, Kilian P, et al. Automatic segmentation of hip bone surface in ultrasound images using an active contour. In CARS 2006 - Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress and Exhibition, Osaka, Japan, 28 June-1 July 2006.
19. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60: 217-220.
20. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 1990; 261: 159-170.
21. Stindel E, Lefèvre C, Faguer B, et al. The Hiploc®: an innovative device to transfer the Lewinneck reference system into the surgical field. Proceedings of the International Society for Computed Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS) Symposium, Langoltz F, Davies BL, Schlenzka D (eds), Helsinki, 2005; 439-441.
22. Keppler P, Wehrle C, Kozak J.: HTO real-time update by navigated ultrasound. Proceedings of the 6th International Annual Meeting of Computed Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS), Montreal, Canada, 21-24 June 2006; 281-283.
23. Amin DV, Kanade T, DiGioia AM III, et al. Ultrasound registration of the bone surface for surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8: 1-16.
24. Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L. 2.5D ultrasound measurement of the geometry of the lower extremities. Proceedings of the 2nd International Annual Meeting of Computed Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS), Santa Fe, NM, USA, 19-23 June 2002.
25. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, et al. Clinical validation of computer assisted pelvic surgery using ultrasound. A percutaneous safe technique with low radiation exposure. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 81: 515-520.