Assessing the impact of the requirement for explicit consent in a hospital-based stroke study

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 281-289

  Jackson, C ^a   Crossland, L ^a   Dennis, M ^a   Wardlaw, J ^a   Sudlow, Cathie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE REGISTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

EID: 41149086284     PISSN: 14602725     EISSN: 14602393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm152     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Al-Shahi R, Vousden C, Warlow C. The Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS) Steering Committee. Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study. BMJ 2005; 331:942-6.
2. Health and Social Care Act 2001 (England & Wales). http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/20010015.htm
3. Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ legislation/scotland/acts2000/20000004.htm
4. Mental Capacity Act 2005 (England & Wales). http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050009.htm
5. UK Data Protection Act 1998. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/ 19980029.htm
6. UK Human Rights Act 1998. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/ 19980042.htm
7. Human Tissue Act 2004 (England & Wales). http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/20040030.htm
8. Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/ scotland/acts2006/20060004.htm
9. Glodblatt P. Evidence will help achieve consensus. BMJ 2006; 332:169.
10. Al-Shahi R, Warlow C. Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit. BMJ 2000; 321:1031-2.
11. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337:1521-6.
12. McLoone P. Carstair's scores for Scottish Postcode sectors from the 2001 Census. http://www.msoc-mrc.gla.ac.uk/Publications/pub/ Carstairs_MAIN.html
13. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3.
14. McKinney PA, Jones S, Parslow R, Davey N, Darowski M, Chaudhry B, et al. The PICANet Consent Study Group. A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database. BMJ 2005; 330 877-9.
15. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, et al The Investigators in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Impracticability of informed Consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. NEJM 2004; 350:1414-21.
16. Ward HJT, Cousens SN, Smith-Bathgate B, Leitch M, Everington D, Will RG, et al. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. BMJ 2004; 329:277-9.
17. Iversen A, Liddell K, Fear N, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act. BMJ 2006; 332 165-9.
18. Rothwell PM. Funding for practice-oriented clinical research. Lancet 2006; 368:262-6.
19. Sudlow C. Lessons from a pregnancy and childbirth. BMJ 2005; 330:973.
20. Barrett G, Cassell JA, Peacock JL, Coleman MP. National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry. BMJ 2006; 332:1068-72.