Example-based metonymy recognition for proper nouns

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 71-78

  Peirsman, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

COMPLEX ALGORITHMS; EXAMPLE BASED; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION BOTTLENECKS; MANUAL ANNOTATION; MEMORY-BASED LEARNING; PROPER NOUNS; TEST INSTANCES; TRAINING EXAMPLE;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 41049113190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1609039.1609048     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. D. W. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. K. Albert. 1991. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6: 37-66.
2. W. Daelemans and A. Van den Bosch. 1992. Generalisation performance of backpropagation learning on a syllabifi cation task. In M. F. J. Drossaers and A. Nijholt, editors, Proceedings of TWLT3: Connectionism and Natural Language Processing, pages 27-37, Enschede, The Netherlands.
3. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2004. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner. Technical report, Induction of Linguistic Knowledge, Computational Linguistics, Tilburg University.
4. D. Fass. 1997. Processing Metaphor and Metonymy. Stanford, CA: Ablex.
5. A. Fujii, K. Inui, T. Tokunaga, and H. Tanaka. 1998. Selective sampling for example-based word sense disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 24(4): 573-597.
6. R. Hwa. 2002. Sample selection for statistical parsing. Computational Linguistics, 30(3): 253-276.
7. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. London: The University of Chicago Press.
8. D. Lin. 1998. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, USA.
9. K. Markert and M. Nissim. 2002a. Metonymy resolution as a classification task. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2002), Philadelphia, USA.
10. K. Markert and M. Nissim. 2002b. Towards a corpus annotated for metonymies: the case of location names. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), Las Palmas, Spain.
11. M. Nissim and K. Markert. 2003. Syntactic features and word similarity for supervised metonymy resolution. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03), Sapporo, Japan.
12. M. Nissim and K. Markert. 2005. Learning to buy a Renault and talk to BMW: A supervised approach to conventional metonymy. In H. Bunt, editor, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
13. G. Nunberg. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York.
14. M. Osborne and J. Baldridge. 2004. Ensemble-based active learning for parse selection. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL). Boston, USA.
15. J. Pustejovsky. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.