The interrelationships between resource-holding potential, resource-value and reproductive success in territorial males: How much variation can we explain?

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 855-871

  Kelly, Clint D ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mating success; Meta analysis; Publication bias; Resource value; Resource defence; Resource holding potential; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; META-ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 41049109840     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0518-8     Document Type: Review

References (165)

1. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152-153
2. Alcock J (1987) The effects of experimental manipulation of resources on the behavior of two calopterygid damselflies that exhibit resource-defense polygyny. Can J Zool 65:2475-2482
3. Alcock J (1995) Body size and its effect on male-male competition in Hylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera, Colletidae). J Insect Behav 8:149-159
4. Alcock J, Eickwort GC, Eickwort KR (1977) The reproductive behaviour of Anthidium maculosum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the evolutionary significance of multiple copulations by females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:385-396
5. Alcock JA, Houston TF (1987) Resource defense and alternative mating tactics in the Banksia bee, Hylaeus alcyoneus (Erichson). Ethology 76:177-188
6. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
7. Andersson S, Pryke SR, Ornborg J, Lawes MJ, Andersson M (2002) Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. Am Nat 160:683-691
8. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton
9. Arnqvist G, Wooster D (1995) Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 10:236-240
10. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1996) Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:407-416
11. Baird TA (1988) Female and male territoriality and mating system of the sand tilefish, Malacanthus plumieri. Environ Biol Fishes 22:101-116
12. Baird TA, Liley NR (1989) The evolutionary significance of harem polygyny in the sand tilefish, Malacanthus plumieri: Resource or female defence? Anim Behav 38:817-829
13. Baker RR (1983) Insect territoriality. Annu Rev Entomol 28:65-89
14. Ballentine B, Hill GE (2003) Female mate choice in relation to structural plumage coloration in Blue Grosbeaks. Condor 105:593-598
15. Balmford A, Rosser AM, Albon SD (1992) Correlates of female choice in resource-defending antelope. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:107-114
16. Begg C (1994) Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp 399-409
17. Blanckenhorn WU, Frei J, Birrer M (2003) The effect of female arrivals on mate monopolization in the yellow dung fly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:65-70
18. Borgia G (1980) Sexual competition in Scatophaga stercoraria: size- and density-related changes in male ability to capture females. Behaviour 75:185-206
19. Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16:308-313
20. Brown WD, Crespi BJ, Choe JC (1997) Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 130-145
21. Calf KM, Downs CT, Cherry MI (2003) Territoriality and breeding success in the Cape Sugarbird (Promerops cafer). Emu 103:29-35
22. Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575-595
23. Carey PW (1991) Resource-defense polygyny and male territory quality in the New Zealand fur seal. Ethology 88:63-79
24. Carranza J (1995) Female attraction by males versus sites in territorial rutting red deer. Anim Behav 50:445-453
25. Carranza J, Fernez-Llario P, Gomendio M (1996) Correlates of territoriality in rutting red deer. Ethology 102:793-805
26. Carvalho N, Afonso P, Santos RSA (2003) The haremic mating system and mate choice in the wide-eyed flounder, Bothus podas. Environ Biol Fishes 66:249-258
27. Catchpole CK (1986) Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:439-445
28. Christy JH, Schober UM (1994) A test for resource-defense mating in the fiddler crab Uca beebei. Anim Behav 48:795-802
29. Conrad KF, Pritchard G (1992) An ecological classification of odonate mating systems - the relative influence of natural, intersexual and intrasexual selection on males. Biol J Linean Soc 45:255-269
30. Convey P (1989) Influences on the choice between territorial and satellite behaviour in male Libellula quadrimaculata Linn. (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 109:125-141
31. Cooper H, Hedges LV (1994) The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, NY
32. Cordoba-Aguilar A (2002) Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: a possible relation to sexual selection. Anim Behav 63:759-766
33. Côte IM, Hunte W (1989) Male and female choice in the redlip blenny: why bigger is better. Anim Behav 38:78-88
34. Dale S, Rinden H, Slagsvold T (1992) Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:165-176
35. Dale S, Slagsvold T (1990) Random settlement of female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: Significance of male territory size. Anim Behav 39:231-243
36. Debuse VJ, Addison JT, Reynolds JD (2003) Effects of breeding site density on competition and sexual selection in the European lobster. Behav Ecology 14:396-402
37. Downhower JF, Brown L (1980) Mate preferences of female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim Behav 28:728-734
38. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000a) A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Amer Stat Assoc 95:89-98
39. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000b) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455-463
40. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223
41. Evans MR, Burn JL (1996) An experimental analysis of mate choice in the wren: A monomorphic, polygynous passerine. Behavl Ecol 7:101-108
42. Fincke OM (1992) Consequences of larval ecology for territoriality and reproductive success of a neotropical damselfly. Ecology 73:449-462
43. Fiske P, Rintamäki PT, Karvonen E (1998) Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 9:328-338
44. Fitzpatrick SM, Wellington WG (1983) Insect territoriality. Canad J Zool 61:471-486
45. Forstmeier W (2002) Factors contributing to male mating success in the polygynous dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus). Behaviour 139:1361-1381
46. Forstmeier W, Leisler B (2004) Repertoire size, sexual selection, and offspring viability in the great reed warbler: changing patterns in space and time. Behav Ecol 15:555-563
47. Forsyth A, Alcock J (1990) Female mimicry and resource defense polygyny by males of a tropical rove beetle, Leistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:325-330
48. Forsyth A, Montgomerie RD (1987) Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damslefly Calopteryx maculata: sneaking by older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:73-81
49. Friedl TWP, Klump GM (1999) Determinants of male mating success in the red bishop (Euplectes orix). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:387-399
50. Giacomello E, Rasotto MB (2005) Sexual dimorphism and male mating success in the tentacled blenny, Parablennius tentacularis (Teleostei: Blenniidae). Mar Biol 147:1221-1228
51. Goldsmith SK (1987) The mating system and alternative reproductive behaviors of Dendrobias mandibularis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:111-115
52. Goldsmith SK, Alcock J (1993) The mating chances of small males of the cerambycid beetle Trachyderes mandibularis differ in different environments (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 6:351-360
53. Gontard-Danek MC, Møller AP (1999) The strength of sexual selection: a meta-analysis of bird studies. Behav Ecol 10:476-486
54. Göransson G, von Schantz T, Fröberg I, Helgée A, Wittzell H (1990) Male characteristics, viability and harem size in the pheasant, Phasianus colchicus. Anim Behav 40:89-104
55. Gottlander K (1987) Variation in the song rate of the male pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 35:1037-1043
56. Grahn M, Goransson G, Vonschantz T (1993) Territory acquisition and mating success in pheasants, Phasianus colchicus: an experiment. Anim Behav 46:721-730
57. Greenfield MD, Minckley RL (1993) Acoustic duelling in tarbush grasshoppers: settlement of territorial contests via alternation of reliable signals. Ethology 95:309-326
58. Gwynne DT, Jamieson I (1998) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in a harem-polygynous insect, the alpine weta (Hemideina maori, Orthoptera Stenopelmatidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 10:393-402
59. Gwynne DT, O'Neill KM (1980) Territoriality in digger wasps results in sex biased predation on males (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae, Philanthus). J Kans Entomol Soc 53:220-224
60. Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (2000) Patterns of nest predation contribute to polygyny in the great reed warbler. Ecology 81:319-328
61. Hasselquist D (1998) Polygyny in great reed warblers: A long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 79:2376-2390
62. Heckel G, von Helversen O (2002) Male tactics and reproductive success in the harem polygynous bat Saccopteryx bilineata. Behav Ecol 13:750-756
63. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL
64. Heimpel GE, Lee JC, Wu ZS, Weiser L, Wackers F, Jervis MA (2004) Gut sugar analysis in field-caught parasitoids: adapting methods originally developed for biting flies. Int J Pest Manag 50:193-198
65. Hernandez MIM, Benson WW (1998) Small-male advantage in the territorial tropical butterfly Heliconius sara (Nymphalidae): a paradoxical strategy? Anim Behav 56:533-540
66. Hoffmann AA (1987) A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Anim Behav 35:807-818
67. Hoffmann AA (1990) The influence of age and experience with conspecifics on territorial behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Behav 3:1-12
68. Hoi-Leitner M, Nechtelberger H, Hoi H (1995) Song rate as a signal for nest-site quality in blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:399-405
69. Howard RD (1978a) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 32:850-871
70. Howard RD (1978b) The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59:789-798
71. Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1985) Female choice of mates in a polygynous insect, the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:385-387
72. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussiere LF (2004) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024-1027
73. Jennions MD (1998) Tibial coloration, fluctuating asymmetry and female choice behaviour in the damselfly Platycypha caligata. Anim Behav 55:1517-1528
74. Jennions MD, Moller AP, Hunt J (2004) Meta-analysis can "fail": reply to Kotiaho and Tomkins. Oikos 104:191-193
75. Jennions MD, Møller AP (2002) Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method. Biol Rev 77:211-222
76. Jennions MD, Møller AP, Petrie M (2001) Sexually selected traits and adult survival: A meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol 76:3-36
77. Jones GP (1981) Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:129-142
78. Kelly CD (2005) Allometry and sexual selection of male weaponry in Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens. Behav Ecol 16:145-152
79. Kelly CD (2006a) Replicating empirical research in behavioral ecology: How and Why it should be done but rarely ever is. Q Rev Biol 81:221-236
80. Kelly CD (2006b) The relationship between resource control, association with females and male weapon size in a male-dominance insect. Ethology 112:362-369
81. Kelly CD (2006c) Resource quality or harem size: What influences male tenure at refuge sites in tree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:175-183
82. Keyser AJ, Hill GE (2000) Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behav Ecol 11:202-209
83. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38
84. Koenig WD, Albano SS (1985) Patterns of territoriality and mating success in the white-tailed skimmer Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Anisoptera). Am Midl Nat 114:1-12
85. Koricheva J (2003) Non-significant results in ecology: a burden or a blessing in disguise? Oikos 102:397-401
86. Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (2002) Meta-analysis, can it ever fail? Oikos 96:551-553
87. Kroon FJ, de Graaf M, Liley NR (2000) Social organisation and competition for refuges and nest sites in Coryphopterus nicholsii (Gobiidae), a temperate protogynous reef fish. Environ Biol Fishes 57:401-411
88. Kwiatkowski MA, Sullivan BK (2002) Mating system structure and population density in a polygynous lizard, Sauromalus obesus (= ater). Behav Ecology 13:201-208
89. Lampe HM, Espmark YO (2003) Mate choice in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca: can females use song to find high-quality males and territories? Ibis 145:E24-E33
90. Lebas NR (2001) Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Mol Ecol 10:193-203
91. Lightbody JP, Weatherhead PJ (1987) Polygyny in the yellow-headed blackbird: female choice versus male competition. Anim Behav 35:1670-1684
92. Lightbody JP, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Female settling patterns and polygyny: tests of a neutral-mate-choice hypothesis. Am Nat 132:20-33
93. Lindström K (1988) Male-male competition for nest sites in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Oikos 53:67-73
94. Lindström K (1992) The effect of resource holding potential, nest size and information about resource quality on the outcome of intruder-owner conflicts in the sand goby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:53-58
95. Lindström K, Pampoulie C (2005) Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies. Behav Ecol 16:70-74
96. Lindström K, Seppä T (1996) The environmental potential for polygyny and sexual selection in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1319-1323
97. Lorch PD, Gwynne DT (2000) Radio-telemetric evidence of migration in the gregarious but not the solitary morph of the Mormon cricket (Anabrus simplex: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Naturwissenschaften 87:370-372
98. Maher CR, Lott DF (2000) A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. Am Midl Nat 143:1-29
99. Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954-959
100. McLain DK (1984) Host plant density and territorial behavior of the seed bug, Neacoryphus bicrucis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:181-187
101. McLain DK (1992) Population density and the intensity of sexual selection on body length in spatially or temporally restricted natural populations of a seed bug. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:347-356
102. Miller GR, Watson A (1978) erritories and food plant of individual red grouse: I. Territory size, number of mates and brood size compared with abundance, production and diversity of heather. J Anim Ecol 47:293-305
103. Miyatake T (1993) Male-male aggressive behavior is changed by body-size difference in the leaf-footed plant bug, Leptoglossus australis, Fabricius (Heteroptera, Coreidae). J Ethol 11:63-65
104. Miyatake T (1995) Territorial mating aggregation in the bamboo bug, Notobitus meleagris, Fabricius (Heteroptera: Coreidae). J Ethol 13:185-189
105. Miyatake T (2002) Multi-male mating aggregation in Notobitus meleagris (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 95:340-344
106. Moore AJ (1990) The evolution of sexual dimorphsim by sexual selection: The separate effects of intrasexual and intersexual selection. Evolution 44:315-331
107. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001a) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88:401-415
108. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001b) Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol Evol 16:580-586
109. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2002) How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? Oecologia 132:492-500
110. Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am Nat 151:174-192
111. Møller AP, Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2005) Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: asymmetry and sexual selection. Anim Behav 70:497-506
112. Nijman V, Heuts BA (2000) Effect of environmental enrichment upon resource holding power in fish in prior residence situations. Behav Processes 49:77-83
113. Oliveira RF, Carvalho N, Miranda J, Goncalves EJ, Grober M, Santos RS (2002) The relationship between the presence of satellite males and nest-holders' mating success in the Azorean rock-pool blenny Parablennius sanguinolentus parvicornis. Ethology 108:223-235
114. Oliveira RF, Miranda JA, Carvalho N, Goncalves EJ, Grober MS, Santos RS (2000) Male mating success in the Azorean rock-pool blenny: the effects of body size, male behaviour and nest characteristics. J Fish Biol 57:1416-1428
115. Otronen M (1984a) Male contests for territories and females in the fly Dryomyza anilis. Anim Behav 32:891-898
116. Otronen M (1984b) The effect of differences in body size on the male territorial system of the fly Dryomyza anilis. Anim Behav 32:882-890
117. Palmer AR (1999) Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: A case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am Nat 154:220-233
118. Papaj DR (1994) Oviposition site guarding by male walnut flies and its possible consequences for mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:187-195
119. Papeschi A, Carroll JP, Dessi-Fulgheri F (2003) Wattle size is correlated with male territorial rank in juvenile ring-necked pheasants. Condor 105:362-366
120. Parish DMB, Coulson JC (1998) Parental investment, reproductive success and polygyny in the lapwing, Vanellus vanellus. Anim Behav 56:1161-1167
121. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. J Theor Biol 47:223-243
122. Plaistow S, Siva-Jothy MT (1996) Energetic constraints and male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1233-1238
123. Pomiankowski AN (1988) The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 5:136-184
124. Powers DR (1987) Effects of variation in food quality on the breeding territoriality of the male Anna hummingbird. Condor 89:103-111
125. Pribil S, Searcy WA (2001) Experimental confirmation of the polygyny threshold model for red-winged blackbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1643-1646
126. Pryke SR, Andersson S (2002) A generalized female bias for long tails in a short-tailed widowbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2141-2146
127. Pryke SR, Andersson S (2003a) Carotenoid-based epaulettes reveal male competitive ability: experiments with resident and floater red-shouldered widowbirds. Anim Behav 66:217-224
128. Pryke SR, Andersson S (2003b) Carotenoid-based status signalling in red-shouldered widowbirds (Euplectes axillaris): epaulet size and redness affect captive and territorial competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:393-401
129. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ (2001) Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: Female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution 55:1452-1463
130. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ, Piper SE (2002) Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and color. Behav Ecol 13:622-631
131. Reaney LT, Backwell PRY (2007) Temporal constraints and female preference for burrow width in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1515-1521
132. Reid ML, Stamps JA (1997) Female mate choice tactics in a resource-based mating system: Field tests of alternative models. Am Nat 150:98-121
133. Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1990) Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am Nat 136:230-243
134. Robertson HM (1982) Mating behaviour and its relationship to territoriality in Platycypha caligata (Selys) (Odonata: Chlorocyphidae). Behaviour 79:11-27
135. Robertson JGM (1986) Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav 34:763-772
136. Roithmair ME (1992) Territoriality and male mating success in the dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology 92:331-343
137. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MS
138. Rosenthal R (1991) Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research, 2nd edn. Sage, London
139. Rosenthal R (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp 231-244
140. Savalli UM (1994a) Mate choice in the yellow-shouldered widowbird: Correlates of male attractiveness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:227-234
141. Savalli UM (1994b) Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird. Anim Behav 48:105-111
142. Searcy WA (1979) Female choice of mates: a general model for birds and its application to red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Am Nat 114:77-100
143. Severinghaus LL, Kurtak BH, Eickwort GC (1981) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the significance of size for territorial males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:51-58
144. Shuster SM (1987) Alternative reproductive behaviors: three discrete male morphs in Paracerceis sculpta, an intertidal isopod from the northern Gulf of California. J Crustac Biol 7:318-327
145. Shuster SM (1992) The Reproductive-Behavior of Alpha-Male, Beta-Male, and Gamma-Male Morphs in Paracerceis-Sculpta, a Marine Isopod Crustacean. Behaviour 121:231-258
146. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (1991) Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350:608-610
147. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
148. Siva-Jothy MT (1999) Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (Zygoptera). Behaviour 136:1365-1377
149. Stewart PD, Ellwood SA, Macdonald DW (1997) Remote video-surveillance of wildlife - an introduction from experience with the European badger Meles meles. Mamm Rev 27:185-204
150. Switzer PV (2002) Territory quality, habitat selection, and competition in the amberwing dragonfly, Perithemis tenera (Say) (Odonata: Libellulidae): Population patterns as a consequence of individual behavior. J Kans Entomol Soc 75:145-157
151. Thompson S (1986) Male spawning success and female choice in the mottled triplefin, Forsterygion varium (Pisces: Tripterygiidae). Anim Behav 34:580-589
152. Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765-788
153. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
154. Thornhill R, Møller AP (1998) The relative importance of size and asymmetry in sexual selection. Behav Ecol 9:546-551
155. Tomkins JL, Kotiaho JS (2004) Publication bias in meta-analysis: seeing the wood for the trees. Oikos 104:194-196
156. Torres-Vila LM, Jennions MD (2005) Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:318-326
157. Tsubaki Y, Ono T (1986) Competition for territorial sites and alternative mating tactics in the dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea Rambur (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 97:234-252
158. Tsubaki Y, Ono T (1987) Effects of age and body size on the male territorial system of the dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea (Odonata: Libellulidae). Anim Behav 35:518-525
159. Villalobos EM, Shelly TE (1991) Correlates of male mating success in two species of Anthidium bees (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:47-53
160. von Schantz T, Grahn M, Göransson G (1994) Intersexual selection and reproductive success in the pheasant Phasianus colchicus. Am Nat 144:510-527
161. Waage JK (1984) Female and male interactions during courtship in Calopteryx maculata and Calopteryx dimidiata (Odonata, Calopterygidae): Influence of oviposition behavior. Anim Behav 32:400-404
162. Wells KD (1977) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58:750-762
163. Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435-447
164. Wootton JT, Bollinger EK, Hibbard CJ (1986) Mating systems in homogeneous habitats: the effects of female uncertainty, knowledge costs, and random settlement. Am Nat 128:499-512
165. Yasukawa K (1981) Male quality and female choice of mate in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 62:922-929