Norway spruce (Picea abies): Bayesian analysis of the relationship between temperature and bud burst

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 631-643

  Schleip, Christoph ^a   Menzel, Annette ^a   Dose, Volker ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PLASMAPHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Bud burst; Nonlinearity; Norway spruce; Prompt response; Simulated annealing; Temperature response; Time series

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BUDBURST; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CONIFEROUS TREE; NONLINEARITY; OPTIMIZATION; PHENOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 41049083882     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anscombe F.J. Graphs in statistical analysis. Am. Statistician 27 (1973) 17-21
2. Beaubien E.G., and Freeland H.J. Spring phenology trends in Alberta, Canada: links to ocean temperature. Int. J. Biometeorol. 44 (2000) 53-59
3. Cannell M.G.R., and Smith R.I. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 20 (1983) 951-963
4. Chmielewski F.M., and Rötzer T. Annual and spatial variability of the beginning of growing season in Europe in relation to air temperature changes. Climate Res. 19 (2002) 257-264
5. Chuine I., Cour P., and Rousseau D.D. Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperature-zone trees using simulated annealing. Plant Cell Environ. 21 (1998) 455-466
6. Chuine I. A unified model for budburst of trees. J. Theor. Biol. 207 (2000) 337-347
7. Dose V., and Menzel A. Bayesian correlation between temperature and blossom onset data. Global Change Biol. 12 (2006) 1451-1459
8. Dose V., and Menzel A. Bayesian analysis of climate change impacts in phenology. Global Change Biol. 10 (2004) 259-272
9. DWD: Deutscher Wetterdienst (Hrsg.), 1991. Anleitung für die phänologischen Beobachter des Deutschen Wetterdienstes. 3. Aufl., Selbstverlag des DWD, Offenbach am Main.
10. Garrett A.J.M. Ockham's Razor. In: Grandy W.T., and Schick L.H. (Eds). Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods (1991), Kluwer, Dordrecht 357-364
11. Gregory P.C. Bayesian logical data analysis for the physical sciences. A Comparative approach with Mathematica Support (2005), Cambridge University Press, Boston
12. Hänninen H. Effects of temperature on dormancy release in woody plants: implications of prevailing models. Silva Fennica 21 (1987) 279-299
13. Hänninen H. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. Acta For. Fenn. 213 (1990) 1-47
14. Hänninen H. Modelling dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. In: Dixon R.K., Meldahl R.S., Ruark G.H., and Warren W.G. (Eds). Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress (1990), Timber Press, Portland 159-165
15. Häkkinen R., Linkosalo T., and Hari P. Effects of dormancy and environmental factors on timing of bud burst in Betula pendula. Tree Physiol. 18 (1998) 707-712
16. Häkkinen R. Statistical evaluation of bud development theories: application to bud burst of Betula pendula leaves. Tree Physiol. 19 (1999) 613-618
17. Hari P. Physiological stage of development in biological models of growth and maturation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 9 (1972) 107-115
18. Hunter A.F., and Lechowicz M.J. Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees. J. Appl. Ecol. 29 (1992) 597-604
19. Kramer K. Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica. J. Appl. Ecol. 31 (1994) 172-181
20. Kramer K. A modelling analysis of the effects of climatic warming on the probability of spring frost damage to tree species in The Netherlands and Germany. Plant Cell Environ. 17 (1994) 367-377
21. Landsberg J.J. Apple fruit bud development and growth; analysis and an empirical model. Ann. Bot. 38 (1974) 1013-1023
22. Linkosalo T. Mutual regularity of spring phenology of some boreal tree species: predicting with other species and phenological models. Can. J. Forest Res. 30 (2000) 667-673
23. Menzel A., and Fabian P. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397 (1999) 659
24. Menzel A. Phenology: its importance to the global change community. Climatic Change 54 (2002) 379-385
25. Menzel A. Phenological anomalies in Germany and their relation to air temperature and NAO. Climatic Change 57 (2003) 243-263
26. Menzel A., Sparks T., Estrella N., Koch E., Aasa A., Ahas R., Alm-Kubler K., Bissolli P., et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biol. 12 10 (2006) 1969-1976 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x
27. Murray M.B., Cannel M.G.R., and Smith R.I. Date of bud burst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming. J. Appl. Ecol. 26 (1989) 693-700
28. Sarvas R. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. II. Autumn dormancy and winter dormancy. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 84 1 (1974) 1-101
29. Scheifinger H., Menzel A., Koch E., et al. Atmospheric mechanisms governing the spatial and temporal variability of phenological observations in central Europe. Int. J. Climatol. 22 (2002) 1739-1755
30. Schnelle F. Pflanzenphänologie. Probleme der Bioklimatologie (1955), Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest und Portig, Leipzig
31. Schleip, C., Menzel, A., Estrella, N., Dose, V., 2006. The use of Bayesian analysis to detect recent changes in phenological events throughout the year. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 141, 179-191. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.09.013.
32. Schleip, C., Rutishauser, T., Luterbacher, J., A., Menzel. Time series modelling and central European temperature impact assessment of phenological records in the last 250 years, in review.
33. Sparks T.H., and Carey P.D. The responses of species to climate over two centuries: an analysis of the Marsham phenological record. J. Ecol. 83 (1995) 321-329
34. Sparks T.H., Jeffree E.P., and Jeffree C.E. An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK. Int. J. Biometeorol. 44 2 (2000) 82-87