Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: Analysis with conventional radiography

Radiology

Volumn 246, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 662-674

  Miller, Theodore T ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MINERAL; BONE TUMOR; CORTICAL BONE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; PERIOSTEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME; BONE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE AND BONES; BONE NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS;

EID: 40949153425     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463061038     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. I. Internal margins. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:715-748.
2. Ragsdale BD, Madewell JE, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. II. Periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:749-783.
3. Sweet DE, Madewell JE, Ragsdale BD. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. III. Matrix patterns. Radiol Clin North Am 1981;19:785-814.
4. Kricun ME. Radiographic evaluation of solitary bone lesions. Orthop Clin North Am 1983;14:39-64.
5. Priolo F, Cerase A. The current role of radiography in the assessment of skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions. Eur J Radiol 1998;27(suppl 1):S77-S85.
6. Brown KT, Kattapuram SV, Rosenthal DI. Computed tomography analysis of bone tumors: patters of cortical destruction and soft tissue extension. Skeletal Radiol 1986;15:448-451.
7. Seeger LL, Dungan DH, Eckardt JJ, Bassett LW, Gold RH. Nonspecific findings on MR imaging: the importance of correlative studies and clinical information. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;270:306-312.
8. Hayes CW, Conway WF, Sundaram M. Misleading aggressive MR imaging appearance of some benign musculoskeletal lesions. RadioGraphics 1992;12:1119-1136.
9. Ma LD, Frassica FJ, Scott WW, Fishman EK, Zerhouni EA. Differentiation of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors: potential pitfalls with MR imaging. RadioGraphics 1995;15:349-366.
10. Resnick D. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2002;3757:3922-3924.
11. Levine SM, Lambiase RE, Petchprapa CN. Cortical lesions of the tibia: characteristic appearances at conventional radiography. RadioGraphics 2003;23:157-177.
12. Roessner A, Jurgens H. Round cell tumours of bone. Pathol Res Pract 1993;189:111-136.
13. Pritchard DJ. Small round cell tumors. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20:367-375.
14. Llombart-Bosch A, Contesso G, Peydro-Olaya A. Histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy of small round cell tumors of bone. Semin Diagn Pathol 1996;13:153-170.
15. Mulligan ME, Kransdorf MJ. Sequestra in primary lymphoma of bone: prevalence and radiologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1245-1248.
16. Cerase A, Priolo F. Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions. Eur J Radiol 1998;27(suppl 1):S91-S97.
17. Pettersson H, Gillespy T 3rd, Hamlin DJ, et al. Primary musculoskeletal tumors: examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities. Radiology 1987;164:237-241.
18. Zimmer WD, Berquist TH, McLeod RA, et al. Bone tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Radiology 1985;155:709-718.
19. White LM, Kandel R. Osteoid-producing tumors of bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4:25-43.
20. Smith SE, Kransdorf MJ. Primary musculoskeletal tumors of fibrous origin. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4:73-88.
21. Kendell SD, Collins MS, Adkins MC, Sundaram M, Unni KK. Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:458-466.
22. Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL, et al. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1097-1104.
23. Flemming DJ, Murphey MD. Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4:59-71.
24. Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. RadioGraphics 1998;18:1213-1237.
25. Murphey MD, Robbin MR, McRae GA, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ. The many faces of osteosarcoma. RadioGraphics 1997;17:1205-1231.
26. Kransdorf MJ, Smith SE. Lesions of unknown histogenesis: Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Ewing sarcoma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4:113-125.
27. Mulligan ME. Myeloma and lymphoma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4:127-135.
28. Assoun J, Richardi G, Railhac JJ, et al. Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 1994;191:217-223.
29. Norton KI, Hermann G, Abdelwahab IF, Klein MJ, Granowetter LF, Rabinowitz JG. Epiphyseal involvement in osteosarcoma. Radiology 1991;180:813-816.
30. Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, et al. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1997;202:237-246.
31. Lang P, Grampp S, Vahlensieck M, et al. Primary bone tumors: value of MR angiography for preoperative planning and monitoring response to chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:135-142.
32. van der Woude HJ, Bloem JL, Verstraete KL, Taminiau AH, Nooy MA, Hogendoorn PC. Osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: value of dynamic MR imaging in detecting viable tumor before surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:593-598.
33. van der Woude HJ, Bloem JL, Hogendoorn PC. Preoperative evaluation and monitoring chemotherapy in patients with high-grade osteogenic and Ewing's sarcoma: review of current imaging modalities. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:57-71.