Acute flexor tendon surgery;Die primäre Naht der Fingerbeugesehnen

Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 44-54

  Stephan, Christine ^a   Saalabian, Ali ^a   van Schoonhoven, Jörg ^a   Prommersberger, Karl Josef ^a  

^a Herz und Gefaessklinik GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active mobilization; Epitendon suture; Flexor tendon laceration; Four strand suture; Mantero suture; Pull out suture

Indexed keywords

ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FLEXOR TENDON INJURY; HEALING; HUMAN; INCISION; INFECTION; LACERATION; MUSCLE FUNCTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT TISSUE DISEASE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; TENDON RECONSTRUCTION; TENDON SURGERY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

CASTS, SURGICAL; FINGER INJURIES; HAND; HUMANS; LACERATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TENDON INJURIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 40949148228     PISSN: 09346694     EISSN: 14390981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00064-008-1227-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barrie KA, Wolfe SW, Shean C, et al. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model. J Hand Surg [Am] 2000;25:499-506.
2. Cullen KW, Tolhurst P, Lang D, et al. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989;14:392-5.
3. Dinopoulos HT, Boyer MI, Burns ME, et al. The resistance of a four- and eight-strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing: an experimental study of repaired canine flexor tendons after 10 days of in vivo healing. J Hand Surg [Am] 2000;25:489-98.
4. Elliot D, Moiemen NS, Flemming AFS, et al. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994;19:607-12.
5. Feehan LM, Beauchene JG. Early tensile properties of healing chicken flexor tendons: Early controlled passiv motion versus postoperative immobilization. J Hand Surg [Am] 1990;15:63-8.
6. Gelberman RH, Woo SLY, Lothringer K, et al. Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg [Am] 1982;7:170-5.
7. Graf V, Papaloizos M, Borisch N, et al. Intérêt de la mobilisation en flexion active protégée après suture des tendons fléchisseurs en zone 2. Chir Main 2001;20:458-65.
8. Harris SB, Harris D, Foster AJ, et al. The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zone 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilization. J Hand Surg [Br] 1999;24:275-80.
9. Kitsis CK, Wade PJF, Krikler SJ, et al. Controlled active motion following primary flexor tendon repair: A prospective study over 9 years. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998;23:344-9.
10. Klein L. Early active motion flexor tendon protocol using one splint. J Hand Ther 2003;16:199-206.
11. Kleinert HE, Ludahn JD. Current state of flexor tendon surgery. Ann Chir Main 1984:3:7-17.
12. Lotz JC, Hariharan JS, Diao E. Analytic model to predict the strength of tendon repairs. J Orthop Res 1998;16:399-405.
13. May EJ, Silverskiöld KL, Sollerman CJ. The correlation between controlled range of motion with dynamic traction and results after flexor tendon repair in zone II. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992;17:1133-9.
14. Noguchi M, Seiler JG, Gelberman RH, et al. In vitro biomechanical analysis of suture methods for flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res 1993;11:603-11.
15. Osada D, Fujita S, Tamai K, et al. Flexor tendon repair in zone II with 6 strand techniques in early active mobilization. J Hand Surg [Am] 2006;31:987-92.
16. Pettengill K. The evolution of early mobilization of the repaired flexor tendon. J Hand Ther 2005;18:157-68.
17. Pribaz JJ, Morrison WA, Macleod AM. Primary repair of flexor tendons in no man's land using the Becker repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989;14:400-5.
18. Pruitt DL, Manske PR, Fink B. Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Am] 1991;16:701-7.
19. Reill P. Die primäre Beugesehnennaht am Unterarm und an der Hand mit sofortiger Übungsbehandlung. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1991;3:95-106.
20. Savage R, Risitano G. Flexor tendon repair using a "6 strand" method of repair and early active mobilization. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989;14:396-9.
21. Silverskiöld KL, Andersson CH. Two new methods of tendon repair: An in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg [Am] 1993;18:58-65.
22. Silverskiöld KL, May EJ. Flexor tendon repair in zone II with a new suture technique and an early mobilization program combining passive and active flexion. J Hand Surg [Am] 1994;19:53-60.
23. Silverskiöld KL, May EJ, Törnvall AH. Gap formation during controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in zone II: A prospective clinical study. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992;17:539-46.
24. Small JO, Brennen MD, Cilville J. Early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989;14:383-91.
25. Stein T, Ali A, Hamman J, et al. A randomized biomechanical study of zone II human flexor tendon repairs analyzed in an in vitro model. J Hand Surg [Am] 1998;23:1046-51.
26. Thurman T, Trumble TE, Hanel DP, et al. Two-, four- and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: An in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model. J Hand Surg [Am] 1998;23:261-5.
27. Wagner WF, Carroll C, Strickland JW, et al. A biomechanical comparison of techniques of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Am] 1994;19:979-83.
28. Winters SC, Gelberman RH, Woo SLY, et al. The effects of multiple strand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons: A biomechanical study in dogs. J Hand Surg [Am] 1998;23:97-104.
29. Xie RG, Zhang S, Tang JB, et al. Biomechanical studies of 3 different 6 strand flexor tendon repair techniques. J Hand Surg [Am] 2002;27:621-7.