Direct, adjoint and mixed approaches for the computation of Hessian in airfoil design problems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 56, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1929-1943

  Papadimitriou, D I ^a   Giannakoglou, K C ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adjoint method; Aerodynamic shape optimization; Hessian matrix

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; DESIGN; GRADIENT METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; VISCOUS FLOW;

ADJOINT METHOD; HESSIAN MATRIX;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DESIGN; GRADIENT METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; VISCOUS FLOW;

EID: 40949145316     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1584     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pierce NA, Giles MB. An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2000; 65(3-4):393-415.
2. Jameson A, Alonso JJ. Automatic aerodynamic optimization on distributed memory architectures. AIAA 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, January 1996; AIAA Paper 96-0409.
3. Reuther J, Alonso JJ, Rimlinger MJ, Jameson A. Aerodynamic shape optimization of supersonic aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation on distributed memory parallel computers. Computers and Fluids 1999; 28:675-700.
4. Nadarajah S, Jameson A, Alonso JJ. An adjoint method for the calculation of remote sensitivities in supersonic flow. AIAA 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, January 2002; AIAA-2002-0261.
5. Nadarajah S, McMullen M, Jameson A. Non-linear frequency domain based optimum shape design for unsteady three-dimensional flow. AIAA Paper 2002-2838, 2002.
6. Duta MC, Giles MB, Campobasso MS. The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 40(3-4):323-332.
7. Pironneau O. On optimum design in fluid mechanics. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1974; 64:97-110.
8. Jameson A. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal of Scientific Computing 1988; 3:233-260.
9. Elliot J, Peraire J. Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes. Twenty Seventh Fluid Dynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, 17-20 June 1996; AIAA Paper 96-1941.
10. Anderson WK, Bonhaus DL. Airfoil design on unstructured grids for turbulent flows. AIAA Journal 1999; 37(2):185-191.
11. Giles MB, Pierce NA. Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behaviour. AIAA Paper 97-1850, 1997.
12. Jameson A. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory. AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995; AIAA Paper 95-1729.
13. Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. AIAA Paper 97-0643, 1997.
14. Kuruvila G, Taasan S, Salas MD. Airfoil design and optimization by the one-shot method. AiAA Paper 95-0478, 1995.
15. Hazra S, Schulz V, Brezillon J, Gauger N. Aerodynamic shape optimization using simultaneous pseudotimestepping. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 204(1):46-64.
16. Mohammadi B, Pironneau O. Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 2001.
17. Jameson A, Kim S. Reduction of the adjoint gradient formula in the continuous limit. AIAA 41th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, January 2003; AIAA-2003-0040.
18. Papadimitriou DI, Giannakoglou KC. A continuous adjoint method with objective function derivatives based on boundary integrals for inviscid and viscous flows. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:325-341.
19. Arian E, Taasan S. Analysis of the Hessian for aerodynamic optimization: inviscid flow. Computers and Fluids 1999; 28(7):853-877.
20. Tortorelli D, Michaleris P. Design sensitivity analysis: overview and review. Inverse Problems in Engineering 1994; 1:71-105.
21. Le Dimet FX, Navon IM, Daescu DN. Second-order information in data assimilation. Monthly Weather Review 2002; 130(3):629-648.
22. Veerse F, Auroux D, Fisher M. Limited-memory BFGS diagonal preconditioners for a data assimilation problem in meteorology. Optimization and Engineering 2000; 1:323-339.
23. Daescu DN, Navon IM. An analysis of a hybrid optimization method for variational data assimilation. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2003; 17(4):299-306.
24. Jameson A, Pierce N, Martinelli L. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 10:213-237.
25. Fletcher R. Practical Methods of Optimization (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 1988.
26. Bertsekas DP. Nonlinear Programming (2nd edn). Athena Scientific, 1999.