An adjoint method for the calculation of remote sensitivities in supersonic flow

40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Nadarajah, Siva K ^a   Jameson, Antony ^a   Alonso, Juan ^a  

^a 496 Lomita Mall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40949140032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. R. Seebass, B. Argrow. Sonic Boom Minimization Revisited. AIAA paper 98-2956, AIAA 2nd Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, June 1998.
2. F. Bauer, P. Garabedian, D. Korn, and A. Jameson. Supercritical Wing Sections II. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975
3. P. Garabedian, and D. Korn. Numerical Design of Transonic Airfoils Proceedings of SYNSPADE1970. pp 253-271, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
4. R. M. Hicks and P. A. Henne. Wing Design by Numerical Optimization. Journal of Aircraft. 15:407-412, 1978.
5. J.L. Lions. Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971. Translated by S.K. Mitter.
6. O. Pironneau. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
7. A. Jameson. Aerodynamic design via control theory. In Journal of Scientific Computing, 3:233-260,1988.
8. A. Jameson. Automatic design of transonic airfoils to reduce the shock induced pressure drag. In Proceedings of the 31st Israel Annual Conference on Aviation and Aeronautics, Tel Aviv, pages 5-17, February 1990.
9. A. Jameson. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory. AIAA paper 95-1729, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 1995.
10. A. Jameson, N. Pierce, and L. Martinelli. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. In AIAA 97-0101, 35th. Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1997.
11. A. Jameson., L. Martinelli, and N. Pierce. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. In Theoretical Computational Fluid Dynamics, 10:213-237, 1998.
12. A. Jameson, J. Alonso, J. Reuther, L. Martinelli, J. Vassberg. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Techniques Based on Control Theory. In AIAA 98-2538, 29th. AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Alburquerque, NM, June 15-18 1998.
13. A. Jameson, L. Martinelli, J. Alonso, J. Vassberg, J. Reuther. Perspective on Simulation Based Aerodynamic Design. Computational Fluid Dynamics for the 21st. Century. In Proceedings of a Symposium Honoring Prof. Satofuka on the Occasion of his 60th. Birthday, Kyoto, Japan. 15-17 July, 2000
14. J. Vassberg and A. Jameson. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Reno Race Plane. In International Journal of Vehicle Design, 28:No.4:318-338, 2002.
15. J. Reuther and A. Jameson. Aerodynamic shape optimization of wing and wing-body configurations using control theory. AIAA 95-0213, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1995.
16. J. Reuther, A. Jameson, J. J. Alonso, M. J Rimlinger, and D. Saunders. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers. AIAA 97-0103, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1997.
17. G. W. Burgreen and O. Baysal. Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings Using Discrete Sensitivity Analysis. AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No.9, September 1996, pp. 1761-1770.
18. S. Nadarajah and A. Jameson. A Comparison of the Continuous and Discrete Adjoint Approach to Automatic Aerodynamic Optimization. AIAA 00-0667, AIAA 38th. Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2000.
19. S. Nadarajah and A. Jameson. Studies of the Continuous and Discrete Adjoint Approaches to Viscous Automatic Aerodynamic Shape Optimization AIAA 2001-2530, AIAA 15th. Computational Fluid Dynamic Conference, Anaheim, Ca, June 11-14, 2001.
20. J. Alonso, A. Jameson, and I. Kroo. Advanced Algorithms for Design and Optimization of Quiet Supersonic Platforms. AIAA 2002-0144i AIAA 40th. Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2002.
21. S. Nadarajah, A. Jameson, J. Alonso. An Adjoint Method for the Calculation of Non-Collocated Sensitivities in Supersonic Flow. In Proceedings of First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, June 12-15, 2001. AIAA 2001-2530, AIAA 15th. Computational Fluid Dynamic Conference, Anaheim, Ca, June 11-14, 2001.
22. G. R. Shubin and P. D. Frank. A Comparison of the Implicit Gradient Approach and the Variational Approach to Aerodynamic Design Optimization. Boeing Computer Services Report AMS-TR-163, April 1991.
23. F. Beux and A. Dervieux. Exact-Gradient Shape Optimization of a 2-D Euler Flow. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 12, 1992, 281-302.
24. J. Elliot and J. Peraire. Aerodynamic Design Using Unstructured Meshes. AIAA 96-1941, 1996.
25. W. K. Anderson and V. Venkatakrishnan. Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Grids with a Continuous Adjoint Formulation. AIAA 96-1941, 1996.
26. A. Lollo, M. Salas, and S. Ta'asan. Shape Optimization Gorvened by the Euler Equations Using and Adjoint Method. ICASE report 93-78, November 1993.
27. S. Ta'asan, G. Kuruvila, and M. D. Salas. Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot. AIAA 91-0025, 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1992.
28. A. Jameson and J. Vassberg. Studies of Alternative Numerical Optimization Methods Applied to the Brachistochrone Problem.
29. R. Campbell, and Smith. L. A Hybrid Algorithm for Transonic Airfoil and Wing Design. AIAA 87-2552-CP, 1987.