Assessing pharmacokinetic variability directly induced by drug intake behaviour through development of a feeding behaviour-pharmacokinetic model

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 251, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 468-479

  Li, J ^a   Petit Jette C E ^a   Gohore Bi, D ^a   Fenneteau, F ^a   del Castillo, J R E ^a   Nekka, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antibiotics; Compliance; Modeling; Simulation; Stochastic

Indexed keywords

CHLORTETRACYCLINE; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANTIBIOTICS; ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; KINETICS; MODELING; PIG; FEEDING; NUMERICAL METHOD; STOCHASTICITY;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG HALF LIFE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GROWTH CURVE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SWINE;

EID: 40949130002     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.033     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Auffray P., and Marcilloux J.C. Analyse de la séquence alimentaire du porc, du sevrage à l'état adulte. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 20 (1980) 1625-1632
2. Bigelow J.A., and Houpt T.R. Feeding and drinking patterns in young pigs. Physiol. Behav. 43 (1988) 99-109
3. Bornett H.L.I., Morgan C.A., Lawrance A.B., and Mann J. The effect of group housing on feeding patterns and social behaviour of previously individually housed growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70 (2000) 127-141
4. Carbon C., and Isturiz R. Narrow versus broad spectrum antibacterials: factors in the selection of pneumococcal resistance to beta-lactams. Drugs 62 (2002) 1289-1294
5. de Haer L.C.M., and Merks J.W.M. Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 54 (1992) 95-104
6. del Castillo J.R.E., Elsener J., and Martineau G.P. Pharmacokinetic modeling of in-feed tetracyclines in pigs using a meta-analytic compartmental approach. J. Swine Health Prod. 6 (1998) 189-202
7. del Castillo, J.R.E., Petit-Jetté, C.E., Li, J., Gohore Bi, D., Lafrance, J., Bergeron, R., Nekka, F., 2005. Votre moulée reçoit bien ses antibiotiques, votre porc aussi? Article Producteurs de Porcs du Québec 2005. Available at: 〈http://www.agrireseau.qc.ca/porc/documents/delCastillo_Jerome. pdf〉.
8. Dourmad J.Y. Standing and feeding behaviour of the lactating sow: effect of feeding level during pregnancy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 37 (1993) 311-319
9. Georgsson L., and Svendsen J. Degree of competition at feeding differentially affects behavior and performance of group-housed growing-finishing pigs of different relative weights. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (2002) 376-383
10. Gohore Bi, D., Petit-Jetté, C.E., Li, J., del Castillo, J.R.E., Bergeron, R., Nekka, F., 2005. A pharmacokinetic model of feed-administered chlortetracycline when the group feeding behaviour is an issue. In: 2005 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition. Available at: 〈http://abstracts.aapspharmaceutica.com/ExpoAAPS05/CC/forms/attende e/index.aspx?content=sessionInfo&sessionId=690〉.
11. Hunneman W.A., Pijpers A., Lommerse J., Crauwels A.P., and Verheijden J.H. Prophylaxis of pleuropneumonia in pigs by in-feed medication with oxytetracycline and the subsequent transmission of infection. Vet. Rec. 134 (1994) 215-218
12. Hyun Y., Ellis M., McKeith F.K., and Wilson E.R. Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. J. Anim. Sci. 75 (1997) 1443-1451
13. Kyriazakis I. A Quantitative Biology of the Pig (1999), CABI Pub., New York, Wallingford (UK)
14. Labroue F., Guéblez R., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., and Sellier P. Feed intake behaviour of group-housed Piétrain and Large White growing pigs. Ann. Zootech. 48 (1999) 247-261
15. Larrabee W.L. Formulation of drugs for administration via feed or drinking water. In: Blodinger J. (Ed). Formulation of Veterinary Dosage Forms (1983), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 175-204
16. Levasseur P., Courboulay V., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., Trespeuch P., and Denmat M. Alimentation automatisée des porcs en finition: effet du rationnement, du sexe et du statut hiérarchique sur des paramètres descriptifs du comportement alimentaire et sur le niveau d'agressivité. J. Rech. Porc. Fr. 28 (1996) 439-444
17. Li J., and Nekka F. A pharmacokinetic formalism explicitly integrating the patient drug compliance. J. Pharmacokinet. Phar. 34 1 (2007) 115-139
18. Morgan C.A., Emmans G.C., Tolkamp B.J., and Kyriazakis I. Analysis of the feeding behavior of pigs using different models. Physiol. Behav. 68 (2000) 395-403
19. Musial F., Kowalski A., Enck P., and Kalveram K.-T. A computer-controlled, long-term recording system for studying eating, drinking, and defecation behavior in miniature pigs. Physiol. Behav. 68 (1999) 73-80
20. Nekka, F., Gohore Bi, D., Fenneteau, F., Li, J., 2007. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic uncertainty generated by irregular drug intake: a stochastic modeling approach. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., submitted for publication.
21. Nielsen B.L., Lawrence A.B., and Whittemore C.T. Feeding behaviour of growing pigs using single or multi-space feeders. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 47 (1996) 235-246
22. Parks J.R. A Theory of Feeding and Growth in Animals (1982), Springer, Berlin
23. Petrie C.L., and Gonyou H.W. Effects of auditory, visual and chemical stimuli on the ingestive behavior of newly weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 66 (1988) 661-668
24. Place G., Labroue F., and Meunier-Salaün M.-C. Incidence du statut social sur le comportement alimentaire de porcs en croissance dans un système de distribution individuelle informatisé. J. Rech. Porc. Fr. 27 (1995) 183-188
25. Sengelov G., Agerso Y., Halling-Sorensen B., Baloda S.B., Andersen J.S., and Jensen L.B. Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ. Int. 28 (2003) 587-595
26. Summary of Research on Feeding Low Test Weight Corn to Pigs, 2000. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario, Canada. Available at: 〈http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/swine/facts/info_n_s ummary.htm〉 (updated on May 2007).
27. Tolkamp B.J., Allcroft D.J., Austin E.J., Nielsen B.L., and Kyriazakis I. Satiety splits feeding behaviour into bouts. J. Theor. Biol. 194 (1998) 235-250
28. Ungemach F.R., Müller-Bahrdt D., and Abraham G. Guidelines for prudent use of antimicrobials and their implications on antibiotic usage in veterinary medicine. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296 S2 (2006) 33-38
29. Vrijens B., Goetghebeur E., de Klerk E., Rode R., Mayer S., and Urquhart J. Modelling the association between adherence and viral load in HIV-infected patients. Stat. Med. 24 17 (2005) 2719-2731
30. Whittemore E.C., Kyriazakis I., Tolkamp B.J., and Emmans G.C. The short-term feeding behavior of growing pigs fed foods differing in bulk content. Physiol. Behav. 76 (2002) 131-141
31. Woodcock J. The prospects for "personalized medicine" in drug development and drug therapy. Clin. Pharmac. Ther. 81 (2007) 164-169
32. Yeates M.P., Tolkamp B.J., Allcroft D.J., and Kyriazakis I. The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analysis of animal behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 213 (2001) 413-425
33. Young R.J., and Lawrence A.B. Feeding behaviour of pigs in groups monitored by a computerized feeding system. Anim. Prod. 58 (1994) 145-152