Human reliability analysis: A new method to quantify errors in cataract surgery

Eye

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 394-397

  Cox, A ^a   Dolan, L ^a   MacEwen, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 40949119483     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702648     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Embrey DE, Humphreys P, Rosa EA, Kirwan B, Rea K. SLIM-MAUD: An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgement, USNRC Report Nureg/CR-3518. United States Nuclear Regulatory Committee: Washington, DC, 1984.
2. Cuschieri A. Human reliability assessment in surgery - a new approach for improving surgical performance and clinical outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 83-87.
3. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery - a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 1998; 29: 409-414.
4. Malik R, White PS, MacEwen CJ. Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2003; 28: 456-460.
5. Embry DE. SHERPA: A systematic human error reduction and prediction approach. Presented at the International Topical Meeting on Advances in Human Factors in Nuclear Power Systems, Knoxville: TN 1986.