Incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 181-187

  Somboonviboon, Wanna ^a   Kyokong, Oranuch ^a   Charuluxananan, Somrat ^a   Narasethakamol, Arunchai ^a  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Bradycardia; Cesarean section; Complication; Hypotension; Spinal anesthesia

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; EPHEDRINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; MORPHINE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRADYCARDIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NAUSEA; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHIVERING; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; SYNCOPE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; UTERUS; VOMITING;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; BRADYCARDIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; INJECTIONS, SPINAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MORPHINE; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 40949115004     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tarkkila P, Isola J. A regression model for identifying patients at high risk of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea during spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 554-8.
2. Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 906-16.
3. Sanborn KV, Castro J, Kuroda M, Thys DM. Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerized anesthesia records. Comparison with voluntary reporting. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 977-87.
4. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 262-9.
5. Michie AR, Freeman RM, Dutton DA, Howie HB. Subarachnoid anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. A comparison of two hyperbaric solutions. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 96-9.
6. Robson SC, Boys RJ, Rodeck C, Morgan B. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic effects of spinal and extradural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 54-9.
7. Russell IF. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. The use of 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 309-14.
8. Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Pothimamaka S, Leerapun R. Hypotension in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5% hyperbaric lidocaine. J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84(Suppl 1): S256-62.
9. Curatolo M, Scaramozzino P, Venuti FS, Orlando A, Zbinden AM. Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after epidural blockade. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1033-40.
10. Charuluxananan S, Suraseranivongse S, Punjasawadwong Y, Somboonviboon W, Nipitsukarn T, Sothikarnmanee T, et al. The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of anesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88(Suppl 7): S1-13.
11. Charuluxananan S, Punjasawadwong Y, Suraseranivongse S, Srisawasdi S, Kyokong O, Chinachoti T, et al. The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of anesthetic outcomes: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88(Suppl 7): S14-29.
12. Clark SL, Cotton DB, Lee W, Bishop C, Hill T, Southwick J, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1439-42.
13. Ueland K, Hansen JM. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. II. Posture and uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 103: 1-7.
14. Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Sriprajittichai P, Poomseetong T, Naksin P. The incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia associated with spinal anesthesia. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89(Suppl 3): S58-64.
15. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991: 325-64.
16. Smith LR. Observational studies and predictive models. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 235-9.
17. Kennedy WF Jr, Bonica JJ, Akamatsu TJ, Ward RJ, Martin WE, Grinstein A. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of subarachnoid block in the presence of acute blood loss. Anesthesiology 1968; 29: 29-35.
18. Reich DL, Wood RK Jr, Mattar R, Krol M, Adams DC, Hossain S, et al. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 612-6.
19. Hartmann B, Junger A, Klasen J, Benson M, Jost A, Banzhaf A, et al. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia induction: an analysis with automated data collection. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1521-9.
20. Moore DC, Bridenbaugh LD. Spinal (subarachnoid) block. A review of 11,574 cases. JAMA 1966; 195: 907-12.
21. Clark RB, Thompson DS, Thompson CH. Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1976; 45: 670-4.
22. Labat G. Regional anesthesia. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1923: 449-50.
23. Ratra CK, Badola RP, Bhargava KP. A study of factors concerned in emesis during spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 1208-11.
24. Crocker JS, Vandam LD. Concerning nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1959; 20: 587-92.
25. Ward RJ, Kennedy WF, Bonica JJ, Martin WE, Tolas AG, Akamatsu T. Experimental evaluation of atropine and vasopressors for the treatment of hypotension of high subarachnoid anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1966; 45: 621-9.
26. Kety SS, King BD, Horvath SM, Jeffers WA, Hafkenschiel JH. The effects of an acute reduction in blood pressure by means of differential spinal sympathetic block on cerebral circulation of hypertensive patients. J Clin Invest 1950; 29: 402-3.