The diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: A blinded, prospective study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 525-532

  Sharma, Prateek ^a,c   Wani, Sachin ^a   Rastogi, Amit ^a   Bansal, Ajay ^a   Higbee, April ^a   Mathur, Sharad ^a   Esquivel, Romeo ^b   Camargo, Lisa ^b   Sampliner, Richard E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HIATUS HERNIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; ESOPHAGITIS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HERNIA, HIATAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 40949106471     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01233.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Johanson JF. Epidemiology of esophageal and supraesophageal reflux injuries. Am J Med 2000 108 (Suppl 4A 99S 103S.
2. Locke GR 3rd., Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population-based study in Olmstead County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997 112 : 1448 56.
3. Farup C, Kleinman L, Sloan S, et al. The impact of nocturnal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Arch Intern Med 2001 161 : 45 52.
4. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M, et al. The burden of selective digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2002 122 : 1500 11.
5. Talley NJ, Fullerton S, Junghard O, et al. Quality of life in patients with endoscopy negative heartburn; reliability and severity of disease-specific instruments. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 : 1998 2004.
6. McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Kee F, et al. Natural history of reflux oesophagitis: A 10 year follow up of its effect on patients symptomatology and quality of life. Gut 1996 38 : 481 6.
7. Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Savarino V. Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003 18 : 1091 8.
8. Winters C, Spurling TC, Chobanian SJ, et al. Barrett's esophagus: A prevalent occult complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1987 92 : 118 24.
9. Hamilton SR, Smith R, Cameron JL. Prevalence and characteristics of Barrett's esophagus in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Hum Pathol 1988 19 : 942 8.
10. Spechler SJ. Clinical practice. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002 346 : 836 42.
11. O'Connor JB, Falk GW, Richter JE. The incidence of adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: Report on the Cleveland Clinic Barrett's Esophagus Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 1999 94 : 2037 42.
12. Sharma P, Falk GW, Weston AP, et al. Dysplasia and cancer in a large multicenter cohort of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 : 566 72.
13. Brown LM, Devesa SS. Epidemiologic trends in esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002 11 : 235 56.
14. Sampliner RE. Practice parameters committee of the ACG. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 : 1888 95.
15. Inadomi JM, Sampliner RE, Lagergren J, et al. Screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus in high-risk groups; a cost-utility analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003 138 : 176 86.
16. Falk GW, Ours TM, Richter JE. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett's esophagus in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 52 : 197 203.
17. Sharma VK, Eliakim R, Sharma P, et al. ICCE consensus for esophageal capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 1060 64.
18. Ginsberg GG, Barkun AN, Bosco JJ, et al. Technology status evaluation report: Wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 : 621 4.
19. Leighton JA, Goldstein J, Hirota W, et al. Standards of practice committee of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 : 650 5.
20. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Weaver AL, et al. A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1994 69 : 539 47.
21. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: Clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999 45 : 172 80.
22. Keuchel M, Hagenmuller F. Small bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 122 32.
23. Eliakim A. Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel (PillCam SB). Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2006 22 : 124 7.
24. Neu B, Wettschureck E, Rosch T. Is esophageal capsule endoscopy feasible? Results of a pilot. Endoscopy 2003 35 : 957 61.
25. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Shilomi I, et al. A novel diagnostic tool for detecting oesophageal pathology: The PillCam oesophageal video capsule. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004 20 : 1083 9.
26. Eliakim R, Sharma VK, Yassin K, et al. A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005 39 : 572 8.
27. Koslowsky B, Jacob H, Eliakim R, et al. PillCam ESO in esophageal studies: Improved diagnostic yield of 14 frames per second (fps) compared with 4 fps. Endoscopy 2006 38 : 27 30.
28. Lin O, Kozarek RA, Schembre D, et al. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) versus conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for identification of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In : Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on capsule endoscopy, Miami, Florida 2005. Yoqneam, Israel: Given Imaging, 2005 : AB87.
29. Lin O, Schembre D, Kozarek R. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 63 : AB103 761.
30. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 : 784 93.
31. Shaheen N, Ransohoff DF. Gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett esophagus and esophageal cancer. Scientific review. JAMA 2002 287 : 1972 81.
32. Sorbi D, Gostout CJ, Henry J, et al. Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative study. Gastroenterology 1999 117 : 1301 7.
33. Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R, et al. ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 1065 7.
34. Ramirez F, Shaukat M, Young M, et al. Feasibility and safety of string, wireless capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 : 741 6.
35. Gralnek IM, Rabinovitz R, Afik D, et al. A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: Initial evaluation in healthy volunteers. Endoscopy 2006 38 : 913 8.
36. Lai LH, Wong G, Chow D, et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 18 : 283 6.