Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission-Part 2: EOC quantification

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1105-1122

  Reer, Bernhard ^a  

^a PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Errors of commission; Human error probability; Human reliability analysis; Probabilistic safety assessment

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM THEORY;

ERRORS OF COMMISSION; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (PSA);

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

EID: 40949104350     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. ASME. Standard for probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications. ASME RA-S-2002 (including addenda ASME RA-Sb-2005) (2002), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
2. NUREG-1792. Good practices for implementing human reliability analysis (HRA). Final report, NUREG-1792, Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2005.
3. BfS. Methoden zur probabilistischen Sicherheitsanalyse für Kernkraftwerke. BfS-SCHR-37/05. Salzgitter, Germany: Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS); 2005 (in German).
4. Dougherty Jr. E.M. Context and human reliability analysis. Reliab Eng System Saf 41 (1993) 25-47
5. Cooper S.E., Ramey-Smith A.M., Wreathall J., Parry G.W., Bley D.C., Luckas W.J., et al. A technique for human error analysis (ATHEANA). NUREG/CR-6350 (1996), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
6. Mosneron-Dupin F., Reer B., Heslinga G., Sträter O., Gerdes V., Saliou G., et al. Human-centred modeling in human reliability analysis: some trends based on case studies. Reliab Eng System Saf 58 (1997) 249-274
7. Reer B. Human analysis of errors of commission: a review of methods and applications. PSI-Bericht 07-04 (2007), Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
8. NUREG-1624. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA). NUREG-1624, Rev. 1 (2000), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
9. Forester J., Bley D., Cooper S., Lois E., Siu N., Kolaczkowski A., et al. Expert elicitation approach for performing ATHEANA quantification. Reliab Eng System Saf 83 (2004) 207-220
10. Le Bot P., Desmares E., Bieder C., Bonnet J.L., and Cara F. MERMOS, An EdF project to update the PHRA methodology. EDF98NB00005 (1997), Electricité de France (EdF), Clamart, France
11. Bieder C, Le Bot P, Desmares E, Bonnet J-L, Cara F. MERMOS: EdF's new advanced HRA method. In: PSAM 4, Proceedings of the fourth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, vol. 1, New York City, USA, 13-18 September 1998. London et al.: Springer; 1998. p. 129-34.
12. Le Bot P, Cara F, Bieder C. MERMOS, A second generation HRA method: what it does and doesn't do. In: Proceedings of the international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment, PSA'99, vol. II, Washington, DC, August 22-26, 1999. La Grange Park, ILL: American Nuclear Society; 1999. p. 852-60.
13. Le Bot P. Contribution from France, MERMOS. Errors of commission in probabilistic safety assessment. NEA/CSNI/R(2000)17 (2000), OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Le Seine, St. Germain, France 75-83
14. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) (1998), Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK
15. Fassmann W, Preischl W. Methode zur Untersuchung und Bewertung schädlicher Eingriffe des Operateurs. Reactor Safety Research-Project no. RS 1112 (Development of advanced methods for a probabilistic safety analysis in particular of level 2), GRS-A-3157. Cologne: Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH; 2003 (in German).
16. Kim J., Jung W., and Park J. A systematic approach to analysing errors of commission from diagnosis failure in accident progression. Reliab Eng System Saf 89 (2005) 137-150
17. Kim J, Jung W, Park J. Guidelines for assessing diagnosis failures for a flowchart-based diagnosis procedure. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 14-19, 2006. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2006. Paper PSAM-0291 (CD-ROM ISBN 0-7918-0244-2).
18. Kim J., Jung W., and Son Y.S. The MDTA-based method for assessing diagnosis failures and their risk impacts in nuclear power plants. Reliab Eng System Saf (2007) 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.020
19. Dang VN, Reer B, Hirschberg S. Analyzing errors of commission: identification and a first assessment for a Swiss plant. In: Proceedings of the OECD NEA workshop, Building the new HRA: errors of commission-from research to application, Rockville, MD, USA, May 7-9, 2001. NEA/CSNI/R(2002)3. Le Seine St. Germain, France: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency; 2002. p. 105-16.
20. Reer B., Dang V.N., and Hirschberg S. The CESA method and its application in a plant-specific pilot study on errors of commission. Reliab Eng System Saf 83 (2004) 187-205
21. Reer B., and Dang V.N. The Commission Errors Search and Assessment (CESA) method. PSI-Bericht 07-07 (2007), Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
22. Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report, NUREG/CR-1278. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1983.
23. Reer B, Dang VN. A method for quantifying errors of commission on the basis of operational event data. In: PSI Scientific report 2005, vol. 3. Energy and environment. Villigen PSI, Switzerland: Paul Scherrer Institute; 2006. p. 40-1.
24. Swain A.D. Accident sequence evaluation program-human reliability analysis procedure. NUREG/CR-4772 (1987), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
25. Williams JC. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 4th conference on human factors in power plants, Monterey, CA, June 6-9, 1988. New York: Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers; 1988. p. 436-50.
26. BfS. Methoden zur probabilistischen Sicherheitsanalyse für Kernkraftwerke. BfS-KT-16/97 (1997), Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS), Salzgitter, Germany [in German]
27. Lanore J.-M. Contribution from France-IPSN: errors of commission in PSA900 and PSA1300. Errors of commission in probabilistic safety assessment. NEA/CSNI/R(2000)17 (2000), OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Le Seine St. Germain, France 71-74
28. Lanore J-M. Response to questionnaire on critical operator actions, PSA 900 and PSA 1300. In: Critical operator actions-human reliability modeling and data issues. NEA/CSNI/R(98)1/Add1. Le Seine, St. Germain, France: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency; 1998. App. F. p. 69-112.
29. Vaurio JK. Questionnaire on critical operator actions (Country: Finland, Study (Plant): Loviisa, Plant type: PWR). In: Critical operator actions-human reliability modeling and data issues. NEA/CSNI/R(98)1/Add1. Le Seine, St. Germain, France: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency; 1998. App. F. p. 56-68.
30. Coxson BA. Questionnaire on critical operator actions, Response by Nuclear Electric Plc, UK. In: Critical operator actions-human reliability modeling and data issues. NEA/CSNI/R(98)1/Add1. Le Seine, St. Germain, France: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency; 1998. App. F. p. 325-45.
31. NUREG-1842. Evaluation of human reliability analysis methods against good practices, Final report, NUREG-1842. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2006.
32. Forester JA, Minarick JW, Schriner HK, Dolan BW, Mitchell DB, Whitehead DW, Jensen JJ. Precursors to potential severe core damage accidents: 1982-83, vol. 24. A status report. NUREG/CR-4674. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1997.
33. NUREG-1154. Loss of main and auxiliary feedwater event at the Davis Besse plant on June 9, 1985. NUREG-1154. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1985.
34. Fukuda M, Uchida T, Hirano M. Trial application of ATHEANA to SGTR in level 1 PSA for a Japanese PWR. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM 5), vol. 3, Osaka, Japan, 27 November-1 Dececmber 2000. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press, Inc.; 2000. p. 1535-40.
35. Fukuda M. Contribution from Japan. Errors of commission in probabilistic safety assessment. NEA/CSNI/R(2000)17 (2000), OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Le Seine, St. Germain, France 147-156
36. Gertman D., Blackman H., Marble J., Byers J., and Smith C. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR-6883 (2005), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
37. Kirwan B. A guide to practical human reliability assessment (1994), Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
38. Grobbelaar J, Julius J. Guidelines for performing human reliability analysis. Draft report, 2003 (citation in [18]).
39. Moieni P., Spurgin A.J., and Singh A. Advances in human reliability analysis methodology, Part I: Frameworks, models and data. Reliab Eng System Saf 44 (1994) 27-55
40. Reer B. Deriving context-specific probabilities from incompletely specified data-sub sample size bounding technique. In: Proceedings of OECD NEA workshop, Building the new HRA: strengthening the link between experience and HRA, Munich, Germany, 28-30 January 2002 (CD-ROM).
41. Reer B. Retrospective event analysis using CODA and perspectives on human error prediction. In: Proceedings of the international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment, PSA'99, vol. II, Washington, DC, August 22-26, 1999. La Grange Park, ILL: American Nuclear Society; 1999. p. 1337-45.
42. Reer B. Sample size bounding and context ranking as approaches to the HRA data problem. Reliab Eng System Saf 83 (2004) 265-274
43. Beare A.N., Dorris R.E., Bovell C.R., Crowe D.S., and Kozinsky E.J. A simulator-based study on human error in nuclear power plant control room tasks. NUREG/CR-3309 (1984), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
44. Gertman D., and Blackman H. Human reliability analysis & safety analysis data handbook (1994), Wiley, New York
45. Kim M.C., Seong P.H., and Hollnagel E. A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM. Reliab Eng System Saf 91 (2006) 191-199
46. Kirwan B, Gibson H, Kennedy R, Edmunds J, Cooksley G, Umbers I. Nuclear Action Reliability Assessment (NARA): a data-based HRA tool. In: Proceeding of the seventh international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, vol. 3, Berlin, Germany, 14-18 June 2004. London et al.: Springer; 2004. p. 1206-11.
47. Hallbert B, Gertman DI, Marble J, Lois E, Siu N. Using information from operating experience to inform human reliability analysis. In: Proceeding of the seventh international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, vol. 2, Berlin, Germany, 14-18 June 2004. London et al.: Springer; 2004. p. 977-82.
48. Sträter O. Cognition and safety: an integrated approach to systems design and assessment (2005), Ashgate, Hampshire, UK
49. Reer B, Dang VN. A technique for scaling of decision error opportunities based on situational features identified from operational events. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, May 14-19, 2006, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2006. Paper PSAM-0389 (CD-ROM, ISBN 0-7918-0244-2).
50. Julius J.A., Jorgenson E.J., Parry G.W., and Mosleh A.M. A procedure for the analysis of errors of commission in a probabilistic safety assessment of a nuclear power plant at full power. Reliab Eng System Saf 50 (1995) 189-201
51. Versteeg MF. Responses to PWG5 Task 94-1 Questionnaire on critical operator actions, Netherlands, Part I, PWR (PSA Borssele NPP). In: Critical operator actions-human reliability modeling and data issues. NEA/CSNI/R(98)1/Add1. Le Seine, St. Germain, France: OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency; 1998. App. F. p. 207-70.