Analytical basis for evaluating the effect of unplanned interventions on the effectiveness of a human-robot system

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1280-1286

  Shah, Julie A ^a   Saleh, Joseph H ^b   Hoffman, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Mean time between intervention; Multi agent system; Risk to humans; System reliability

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; ROBOTS; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMPONENT FAILURES; MEAN TIME BETWEEN INTERVENTIONS; RISK TO HUMANS;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 40949099093     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Carleson J., and Murphy R. Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34 2 (2004) 138-153
2. Burke J.L., Murphy R.R., Rogers E., Lumelsky V.J., and Scholtz J. Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Pt C 34 2 (2004) 103-112
3. Schenker P.S., Huntsberger T.L., Pirjanian P., Baumgartner E.T. Planetary rover developments supporting mars exploration, sample return and future human-robotic colonization. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2001. p. 31-47.
4. Shah J., Saleh J., and Hoffman J. Review and synthesis of considerations in architecting heterogeneous teams of humans and robots for space exploration. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Pt C 37 5 (2007)
5. Institute of Electrical and Inc. Electronics Engineers. IEEE recommended practice for the design of reliable industrial and commercial power systems. IEEE Std. 493-1997, 1998. IEEE Gold Book.
6. Thrun S. Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Comput Interact 19 1-2 (2004) 9-24
7. Kumar U., Knezevic J., and Crocker J. Maintenance free operating period-an alternative measure to MTBF and failure rate for specifying reliability?. Reliab Eng System Saf 64 1 (1999) 127-131