The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 101-116

  Sarkar, Prabir ^a   Chakrabarti, Amaresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Creativity; Design Representation; Multimodal; Trigger

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DESIGN REPRESENTATION; SOLUTION SPACE;

TRIGGER CIRCUITS;

EID: 40849142141     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060408000073     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adler, A., & Davis, R. (2004). Speech and Sketching for Multimodal Design, IUI'04. Funchal, Portugal: Maderia.
2. Ainsworth, S.E., & Van Labeke, N. (2002). Using a multi-representational design framework to develop and evaluate a dynamic simulation environment. Dynamic Information and Visualisation Workshop, Tubingen.
3. Boden, M.A. (1994). What is creativity? In Dimensions of Creativity (Boden, M.A., Ed.), pp. 75-117. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cambridge University Press. (2007). Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, & Nataraju, B. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(2), 113-132.
6. Chandrasekaran, B. (1988). Design: an information processing level analysis. In Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies (Brown, D., & Chandrasekaran. B.. Eds.). London: Pitman.
7. Chandrasekaran, B. (1999). Multimodal perceptual representations and design problem solving. Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design: Computational and Cognitive Approaches Conf., MIT. Cambridge, MA, June 15-17.
8. Freemantle, D. (2001). The Stimulus Factor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Goel, A.K., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989), Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1388-1394.
10. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Gross, M.D., Johnson, B.R., & Do, E.Y.-L. (2001). The design amanuensisan instrument for multimodal design capture and playback. Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Aided. Architectural Design Futures, pp. 1-13.
12. Indian Institute of Science. (2004). Idea-Inspire User's Manual. Bangalore, India: Indian Institute of Science, Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing.
13. Jansson, D.G., & Smith, S.M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 3-11.
14. Kletke, M., Mackay, J.M., Barr, S.M., & Jones, B. (2001). Creativity in the organization: the role of individual creative problem solving and computer support. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55, 217-237.
15. Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65-99.
16. Liberman, J.N. (1977). Playfulness. New York: Academic Press.
17. MacCrimmon, K.R., & Wagner, C. (1994). Stimulating ideas through creative software. Management Science 40, 1514-1532.
18. Mayer, R.E. (1993). Illustrations that impact. In Advances in Instructional Psychology (Glaser, R., Ed.), Vol. 4, pp. 253-284. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Microsoft. (2007). Encarta World English Dictionary. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
20. Mycoted. (2007). Creativity techniques: an A to Z. Accessed at http://www. mycoted.com/Category: Creativity .Techniques
21. Nakakoji, K., (1993), Increasing shared understanding of a design task between designers and design environments: the role of a specification component. PhD Thesis. University of Colorado at Boulder.
22. Oxford University Press. (2007). Oxford Compact English Dictionary, New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and leaders' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(3), 327-345.
24. Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2007). Understanding search in design. Int. Conf Engineering Design, ICED'07, Paris, August 28-31.
25. Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary - towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review 14(1), 101-120.
26. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2002). The effect of representation on students elaborations in collaborative enquiry. Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Boulder, CO.
27. Torrance, E.P. (1979). The gifted and the talented: their education and development. In The Gifted and the Talented: Their Education and Development (Passow, A.H., Ed.), pp. 352-371. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
28. Watson, D.U. (1989). Enhancing creative productivity with the Fisher associated lists. Journal of Creative Behavior 23(1), 51-58.
29. Woodbury, R.F., & Burrow, A.L. (2006). Whither design space? Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 20(1), 63-82
30. Young, L.F. (1987). The metaphor machine: a database method for creativity support. Decision Making Support System 3, 309-317.
31. Zabel, A., Deisinger, J., Weiler, F., & Hamisch, T. (1999). A multimodal design environment, Proc. ESS European Simulation Symp. Exhibition, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.