Comparison of remote sensing image processing techniques to identify tornado damage areas from Landsat TM data

Sensors

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 1128-1156

  Myint, Soe W ^a   Yuan, May ^b   Cerveny, Randall S ^a   Giri, Chandra P ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c USGS Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS)

Author keywords

Change detection; Damage; Image differencing; Object oriented; Principal component

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; TORNADOES;

CHANGE DETECTION; DAMAGE; IMAGE DIFFERENCING; OBJECT ORIENTED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 40849096430     PISSN: 14243210     EISSN: 14248220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s8021128     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Congalton, R. G.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, Florida, 1999; 137 p.
2. Myint, S. W.; Mesev, V.; Lam, N. S. N. Texture Analysis and Classification Through A Modified Lacunarity Analysis Based on Differential Box Counting Method, Geographical Analysis, 2006, 36, 371-390.
3. Nelson, R. F. Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 1983, 49, 1303-1314.
4. Pilon, P. G.; Howarth, P. J.; Bullock, R. A. An enhanced classification approach to change detection in semi-arid environments. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 1988, 54, 1709-1716.
5. Coppin, P.; Jonckheere, I.; Nackaerts, K.; Muys, B.; Lambin E. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2004, 25, 1565-1596.
6. Howarth, J. P.; Wickware, G. M. Procedure for change detection using Landsat digital data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 1981, 2, 277-291.
7. Myint, S. W.; Wang, L. Multi-criteria Decision Approach for Land Use Land Cover Change Using Markov Chain Analysis and Cellular Automata Approach, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 32(6), 390-404.
8. Singh, A. Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1989, 10, 989-1003.
9. Singh A. Change detection in the tropical forest environment of northern India using Landsat. In Remote Sensing and Land management, M. Eden and Parry, J. Ed.; 1986, pp 237-253.
10. Yuan, D.; Elvidge, C. D.; Lunetta, R. Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. In Remote Sensing Change Detection, Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications; R. Lunetta, R.; Elvidge, C. D. Ed.; Ann Arbor press, Michigan, 1998, pp 1-19.
11. Fung, T.; LeDrew, E. Applications of principal component analysis to change detection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 1987, 53, 1649-1658.
12. Lambin, E. F.; Strahlar, A. H. Change-vector analysis in multispectral space: A tool to detect and categorize land-cover change processes using high temporal-resolution satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1994, 48, 231-244.
13. Inamura, M.; Toyota, H.; Fujimura, S. Exterior algebraic processing for remotely sensed multispectral and multitemporal images, IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing. 1982, GE2-(1), 112-118.
14. th International Symposium of Remote Sensing of Environment, San Juan, Costa Rica, 1981, 1341-1351.
15. Lyon, J. G.; Yuan, D.; Lunetta, R. S.; Elvidge, C. D. A change detection experiment using vegetation indices. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1998, 64, 143-150.
16. Yuan, M.; Dickens-Micozzi, M.; Magsig, M.A. Analysis of tornado damage tracks from the 3 May tornado outbreak using multispectral satellite imagery. Weather and Forecasting. 2002, 17(3), 382-398.
17. Lillesand. T.; Podger, N.; Chipman, J.; Goldmann, R.; Lewelling, K.; Olsen, T. Assessing tornado damage via analysis of multi-temporal Landsat 7 ETM+ data. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual conference of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), Washington D.C., April 21-27, 2002.
18. th edition: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2004, 763 p.
19. Desclée, B.; Bogaert, P.; Defourny, P. Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006, 102, 1-11.
20. Navulur, K. Multispectral image analysis using the object-oriented paradigm, CRC Press, Taylor and Frances Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2007, 165 p.
21. Myint, S. W.; Giri, C. P.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z.; and Gillette, S. Identifying mangrove species and their surrounding land use and land cover classes using an object oriented approach with a lacunarity spatial measure (under review).
22. Baatz, M.; Schape, A. Object-Oriented and Multi-Scale Image Analysis in Semantic Networks. In Proc. of the 2nd International Symposium on Operationalization of Remote Sensing, Enschede, ITC, August 16-20, 1999.
23. Ivits, E.; Koch, B. Object-Oriented Remote Sensing Tools for Biodiversity Assessment: a European Approach. Proceedings of the 22nd EARSeL Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 4-6 June 2002, Mill press Science Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
24. Definiens, eCognition. User Guide 4.0, Germany, 2004, 486 p.
25. Congalton, R. G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1991, 37, 35-46.
26. Anderson, J.; Hardy, E. E.; Roach, J. T.; Witmer, R. E. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. USGS Professional Paper 964, Sioux Falls, SD, USA, 1976, pp 41.
27. Townshend, J. R. G. Terrain Analysis and Remote Sensing, George Allen and Unwin: London, 1981.