Simulation of the market penetration of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 318-327

  Jun, Eunju ^a   Jeong, Yong Hoon ^a   Chang, Soon Heung ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hydrogen; Hydrogen powered fuel cell vehicle; Korea transportation sector; Market share; Vensim

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUEL CELLS; GASOLINE; MARKETING;

HYDROGEN ECONOMY; HYDROGEN FUEL CELL VEHICLES; MARKET SHARE; SYSTEM DYNAMIC CODE; TRANSPORTATION MARKET;

HYDROGEN FUELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUEL CELLS; GASOLINE; HYDROGEN FUELS; MARKETING;

EID: 40849096414     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.1358     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Davis SC, Diegel SW. Transportation Energy Data Book (25th edn). ORNL-6974, May 2006.
2. Birky A, Greene D, Gross T et al. Future U.S. Highway Energy Use: A Fifty Year Perspective, 2001.
3. Millikin M. Green Car Congress: Energy, Technologies, Issues and Policies for Sustainable Mobility, 2006.
4. Winter C-J. Into the hydrogen energy economy - milestones. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2005; 30:681-685.
5. Miller AI, Duffey RB. Sustainable and economic hydrogen cogeneration from nuclear energy in competitive power markets. Energy 2005; 30:2690-2702.
6. Penner SS. Steps toward the hydrogen economy. Energy 2006; 31:33-34.
7. Swain MR. Fuel leak simulation. Proceedings of the 2001 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, NREL/CP-570-30535, 2001.
8. Lattin WC, Utgikar VP. Transition to hydrogen economy in the United States: a 2006 status report. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007. Available online 12 April 2007, DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2007.02.004.
9. California Fuel-Cell Partnership (CAFCP). Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles in California, 2006.
10. UTC Power, 2006. http://utcpower.com/fs/com/bin/fs_com_page.
11. Graham R. Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options, EPRI, July 2002.
12. Chalker S. U.S. Hydrogen Program. U.S. Department of Energy, 2006.
13. Reynolds C, Kandikar M. How hybrid-electric vehicles are different from conventional vehicles: the effect of weight and power on fuel consumption. Environmental Research Letters 2007; 2(014003):8. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014003.
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fuel Economy Guide. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and renewable Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.
15. Korea National Statistical Office. Consumer Price Index. Korea Statistical Information System, Korea National Statistical Office, 2007.
16. Graham R. Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options, EPRI, July 2001.
17. EIA. World crude oil price, Energy Information Administration, 2007. http://www.eia.doe.gov.
18. Leiby P, Rubin J. The Hydrogen Energy Transition. Academic Press: New York, 2004; 196.
19. Tsuchiya H, Kobayashi O. Fuel cell cost study by learning curve. International Energy Workshop, EMF/IIASA, 18-20 June 2002.
20. International Energy Outlook. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, 2005. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/ 0484(2005).pdf.
21. National Academy of Science. Hydrogen Economy. National Academy of Science, 2004.