Chapter 25 Knowledge Engineering

Foundations of Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 929-946

  Schreiber, Guus ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40849088097     PISSN: 15746526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-6526(07)03025-8     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Allen J. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26 (1983) 832-843
2. Artale A., Franconi E., and Pazzi L. Part-whole relations in object-centered systems: An overview. Data and Knowledge Engineering 20 (1996) 347-383
3. Boose J.H. A survey of knowledge acquisition techniques and tools. Knowledge Acquisition 1 1 (1989) 3-37
4. R.J. Brachman and H.J. Levesque. The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In AAAI 84, 1984
5. Brachman R.J., and Schmolze J.G. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9 (1985) 171-216
6. Chandrasekaran B. Generic tasks in knowledge based reasoning: High level building blocks for expert system design. IEEE Expert 1 3 (1986) 23-30
7. Chandrasekaran B. Design problem solving: A task analysis. AI Magazine 11 (1990) 59-71
8. Clancey W.J. The epistemology of a rule based system-a framework for explanation. Artificial Intelligence 20 (1983) 215-251
9. Clancey W.J. Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence 27 (1985) 289-350
10. Davis R., Shrobe H., and Szolovits P. What is a knowledge representation?. AI Magazine (Spring 1993) 17-33
11. Fensel D. The Knowledge Acquisition and Representation Language KARL (1995), Kluwer. 978-0792396017
12. Fensel D., and van Harmelen F. A comparison of languages which operationalise and formalise KADS models of expertise. The Knowledge Engineering Review 9 (1994) 105-146
13. Gamma E., Helm R., Johnson R., and Vlissides J. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (1995), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
14. Gangemi A. Ontology design patterns for Semantic Web content. International Semantic Web Conference ISWC'05, Galway, Ireland. LNCS (2005), Springer-Verlag 262-276
15. Ginsberg M.L. Knowledge interchange format: the KIF of death. AI Magazine 12 33 (1991) 57-63
16. Gruber T.R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 199-220
17. Gruber T.R. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino N., and Poli R. (Eds). Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation (1994), Kluwer, Boston
18. Gruber T.R., Olsen G.R., and Runkel J. The configuration-design ontologies and the VT elevator domain theory. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 44 3-4 (1996) 569-598
19. Guarino N., and Welty C. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Comm. ACM 45 2 (2002) 61-65
20. Hobbs J.R., and Pan F. Time ontology in OWL. Technical report, Ontology Engineering Patterns Task Force of the Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2006). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
21. Lenat D. The dimensions of context space. Technical report, CYCORP. URL: (28 October 1998). http://www.cyc.com/doc/context-space.pdf
22. In: Marcus S. (Ed). Automatic Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems (1988), Kluwer, Boston
23. Marcus S., and McDermott J. SALT: A knowledge acquisition language for propose-and-revise systems. Artificial Intelligence 39 1 (1989) 1-38
24. McDermott J. Preliminary steps towards a taxonomy of problem-solving methods. In: Marcus S. (Ed). Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems (1988), Kluwer, Boston 225-255
25. Meyer M.A., and Booker J.M. Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgement: A Practical Guide (1991), Academic Press
26. Miller G. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Comm. ACM 38 11 (November 1995)
27. Motta E., Stutt A., Zdrahal Z., O'Hara K., and Shadbolt N.R. Solving VT in VITAL: a study in model construction and reuse. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 44 3-4 (1996) 333-372
28. Newell A. The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence 18 (1982) 87-127
29. Noy N., and Rector A. Defining N-ary relations on the Semantic Web. Technical report, W3C Working Group Note (2006). http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations
30. Odell J. Six different kinds of composition. Journal of Object Oriented Programming 5 8 (1994) 10-15
31. A. Oltramari, A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, and C. Masolo. Restructuring WordNet's top-level: The OntoClean approach. In Proc. LREC 2002, 2002
32. Puerta A.R., Egar J., Tu S., and Musen M. A multiple-method shell for the automatic generation of knowledge acquisition tools. Knowledge Acquisition 4 (1992) 171-196
33. Rector A. Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including OWL. Proc. K-CAP'03 (2003), AAAI 121-128
34. Rector A. Representing specified values in OWL: "value partitions" and "value sets". Technical report, W3C Working Group Note (2005). http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values
35. Rector A., and Welty C. Simple part-whole relations in OWL ontologies. Technical report, World-Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Working Group Note (2005). http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/
36. Rosse C., and Mejino J.V.L. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the foundational model of anatomy. J. Biomedical Informatics 36 (2003) 478-500
37. Schreiber A.Th., Akkermans J.M., Anjewierden A.A., de Hoog R., Shadbolt N.R., Van de Velde W., and Wielinga B.J. Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Schreiber A.Th., and Birmingham W.P. The Sisyphus-VT initiative. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 43 3-4 (1996) 275-280 (Editorial special issue)
39. Schreiber A.Th., Wielinga B.J., de Hoog R., Akkermans J.M., and Van de Velde W. CommonKADS: A comprehensive methodology for KBS development. IEEE Expert 9 6 (December 1994) 28-37
40. Steels L. Components of expertise. AI Magazine (Summer 1990)
41. Stefik M. Introduction to Knowledge Systems (1993), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA
42. Tate A. Towards a plan ontology. Journal of the Italian AI Association (AIIA) (January 1996)
43. A. Valente and C. Löckenhoff. Organization as guidance: A library of assessment models. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (EKAW'93), pages 243-262, 1993
44. van Harmelen F., and Aben M. Structure preserving specification languages for knowledge-based systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 44 (1996) 187-212
45. 2: a formal language for KADS models of expertise. Knowledge Acquisition 4 1 (1992) Special issue: 'The KADS approach to knowledge engineering', reprinted in A.Th. Schreiber, et al., editors, KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development, 1993
46. Web Ontology Working Group. OWL web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
47. B.J. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker. Interpretation of verbal data for knowledge acquisition. In T. O'Shea, editor, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pages 41-50, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984. ECAI, Elsevier Science. Also as: Report 1.4, ESPRIT Project 12, University of Amsterdam
48. B.J. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker. Models of expertise. In Proceedings ECAI-86, pages 306-318, 1986
49. Wielinga B.J., Schreiber A.Th., and Breuker J.A. KADS: A modelling approach to knowledge engineering. Knowledge Acquisition 4 1 (1992) 5-53 Reprinted
50. Wielinga B.J., Schreiber A.Th., and Breuker J.A. KADS: A modelling approach to knowledge engineering. In: Buchanan B., and Wilkins D. (Eds). Readings in Knowledge Acquisition and Learning (1992), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA 92-116