Membrane dynamics of cleavage furrow closure in Xenopus laevis

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 237, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 565-579

  Danilchik, Michael V ^a   Brown, Elizabeth E ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cleavage furrow; Contractile ring; Embryo; Filopodia; Furrow closure; Lamellipodia; Xenopus; Zippering

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN;

ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SPREADING; CELL SURFACE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EXOCYTOSIS; FILOPODIUM; LAMELLIPODIUM; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIGHT JUNCTION; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CDC42 GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; CELL POLARITY; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RHOA GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 40849086354     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21442     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aimar C. 1991. Cyclic changes in amphibian egg microvilli occur during the division cycle: implication of MPF. Development 112:91-98.
2. Angres B, Muller AH, Kellermann J, Hausen P. 1991. Differential expression of two cadherins in Xenopus laevis. Development 111:829-844.
3. Arnold JM. 1974. Cleavage furrow formation in a telolecithal egg (Loligo pealei). III. Cell surface changes during cytokinesis as observed by scanning microscopy. Dev Biol 40:225-232.
4. Beams HW, Kessel RG. 1976. Cytokinesis: a comparative study of cytoplasmic division in animal cells. Am Sci 64:279-290.
5. Bement WM, Benink HA, von Dassow G. 2005. A microtubule-dependent zone of active RhoA during cleavage plane specification. J Cell Biol 170:91-101.
6. Benink HA, Bement WM. 2005. Concentric zones of active RhoA and Cdc42 around single cell wounds. J Cell Biol 168:429-439.
7. Bluemink JG. 1970. The first cleavage of the amphibian egg. An electron microscope study of the onset of cytokinesis in the egg of Ambystoma mexicanum. J Ultrastruct Res 32:142-166.
8. Bluemink JG, de Laat SW. 1973. New membrane formation during cytokinesis in normal and cytochalasin B-treated eggs of Xenopus laevis. I. Electron microscope observations. J Cell Biol 59:89-108.
9. Bryant PJ. 1999. Filopodia: fickle fingers of cell fate? Curr Biol 9:R655-R657.
10. Cardellini P, Davanzo G, Citi S. 1996. Tight junctions in early amphibian development: detection of junctional cingulin from the 2-cell stage and its localization at the boundary of distinct membrane domains in dividing blastomeres in low calcium. Dev Dyn 207:104-113.
11. Chalmers AD, Strauss B, Papalopulu N. 2003. Oriented cell divisions asymmetrically segregate aPKC and generate cell fate diversity in the early Xenopus embryo. Development 130:2657-2668.
12. Chalmers AD, Pambos M, Mason J, Lang S, Wylie C, Papalopulu N. 2005. aPKC, Crumbs3 and Lgl2 control apicobasal polarity in early vertebrate development. Development 132:977-986.
13. Charbonneau M, Picheral B. 1983. Early events in Anuran amphibian fertilization: an ultrastructural study of changes occurring in the course of monospermic fertilization and artificial activation. Dev Growth Differ 25:23-37.
14. Danilchik MV, Funk WC, Brown EE, Larkin K. 1998. Requirement for microtubules in new membrane formation during cytokinesis of Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 194:47-60.
15. Danilchik MV, Bedrick SD, Brown EE, Ray K. 2003. Furrow microtubules and localized exocytosis in cleaving Xenopus laevis embryos. J Cell Sci 116:273-283.
16. Denis-Donini S, Baccetti B, Monroy A. 1976. Morphological changes of the surface of the eggs of Xenopus laevis in the course of development. 2. Cytokinesis and early cleavage. J Ultrastruct Res 57:104-112.
17. Drechsel DN, Hyman AA, Hall A, Glotzer M. 1996. A requirement for Rho and Cdc42 during cytokinesis in Xenopus embryos. Curr Biol 7:12-23.
18. Fagotto F, Gumbiner BM. 1994. Beta-catenin localization during Xenopus embryogenesis: accumulation at tissue and somite boundaries. Development 120:3667-3679.
19. Farooqui R, Fenteany G. 2005. Multiple rows of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic lamellipoda to collectively drive cell-sheet movement. J Cell Sci 118:51-63.
20. Fenteany G, Janmey PA, Stossel TP. 2000. Signaling pathways and cell mechanics involved in wound closure by epithelial cell sheets. Curr Biol 10:831-838.
21. Fesenko I, Kurth T, Sheth B, Fleming TP, Citi S, Hausen P. 2000. Tight junction biogenesis in the early Xenopus embryo. Mech Dev 96:51-65.
22. Gawantka V, Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H, Hausen P. 1992. Beta 1-integrin is a maternal protein that is inserted into all newly formed plasma membranes during early Xenopus embryogenesis. Development 115:595-605.
23. Ginsberg D, DeSimone D, Geiger B. 1991. Expression of a novel cadherin (EP-cadherin) in unfertilized eggs and early Xenopus embryos. Development 111:315-325.
24. Gustafson T, Wolpert L. 1962. Cellular mechanisms in the morphogenesis of the sea urchin larva. Change in shape of cell sheets. Exp Cell Res 27:260-279.
25. Gustafson T, Wolpert L. 1967. Cellular movement and contact in sea urchin morphogenesis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 42:442-498.
26. Jacinto A, Wood W, Woolner S, Hiley C, Turner L, Wilson C, Martinez-Arias A, Martin P. 2002. Dynamic analysis of actin cable function during Drosophila dorsal closure. Curr Biol 12:1245-1250.
27. Jesuthasan S. 1998. Furrow-associated microtubule arrays are required for the cohesion of zebrafish blastomeres following cytokinesis. J Cell Sci 111(Pt 24):3695-3703.
28. Kalt MR. 1971. The relationship between cleavage and blastocoel formation in Xenopus laevis. II. Electron microscopic observations. J Embryol Exp Morphol 26:51-66.
29. Keller R. 2002. Shaping the vertebrate body plan by polarized embryonic cell movements. Science 298:1950-1954.
30. LeBlanc J, Brick I. 1981. Morphologic aspects of adhesion and spreading behavior of amphibian blastula and gastrula cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 61:145-163.
31. Martin P, Parkhurst SM. 2004. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 131:3021-3034.
32. Matsuda M, Ubels JL, Edelhauser HF. 1985. A larger corneal epithelial wound closes at a faster rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:897-900.
33. Merzdorf CS, Chen YH, Goodenough DA. 1998. Formation of functional tight junctions in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 195:187-203.
34. Muller HA, Hausen P. 1995. Epithelial cell polarity in early Xenopus development. Dev Dyn 202:405-420.
35. Munro EM, Odell GM. 2002. Polarized basolateral cell motility underlies invagination and convergent extension of the ascidian notochord. Development 129:13-24.
36. Noguchi T, Mabuchi I. 2001. Reorganization of actin cytoskeleton at the growing end of the cleavage furrow of Xenopus egg during cytokinesis. J Cell Sci 114: 401-412.
37. Ohshima H, Kubota T. 1985. Cell surface changes during cleavage of newt eggs: scanning electron microscopic studies. J Embryol Exp Morphol 85:21-31.
38. Pelegri F, Knaut H, Maischein HM, Schulte-Merker S, Nusslein-Volhard C. 1999. A mutation in the zebrafish maternal-effect gene nebel affects furrow formation and vasa RNA localization. Curr Biol 9:1431-1440.
39. Radice GP. 1980. The spreading of epithelial cells during wound closure in Xenopus larvae. Dev Biol 76:26-46.
40. Raich WB, Agbunag C, Hardin J. 1999. Rapid epithelial-sheet sealing in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo requires cadherin-dependent filopodial priming. Curr Biol 9:1139-1146.
41. Roberts SJ, Leaf DS, Moore HP, Gerhart JC. 1992. The establishment of polarized membrane traffic in Xenopus laevis embryos. J Cell Biol 118:1359-1369.
42. Roeder AD, Gard DL. 1994. Confocal microscopy of F-actin distribution in Xenopus oocytes. Zygote 2:111-124.
43. Salas-Vidal E, Lomeli H. 2004. Imaging filopodia dynamics in the mouse blastocyst. Dev Biol 265:75-89.
44. Satoh N, Deno T. 1984. Periodic appearance and disappearance of microvilli associated with cleavage cycles in the egg of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Biol 102:488-492.
45. Schneider S, Herrenknecht K, Butz S, Kemler R, Hausen P. 1993. Catenins in Xenopus embryogenesis and their relation to the cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion system. Development 118:629-640.
46. Selman GG, Perry MM. 1970. Ultrastructural changes in the surface layers of the newt's egg in relation to the mechanism of its cleavage. J Cell Sci 6:207-227.
47. Semik D, Kilarski W. 1998. Scanning electron microscopy of the egg surface of the common toad, Bufo bufo, following fertilization and during first cleavage. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 36:29-34.
48. Singal PK, Sanders EJ. 1974. An ultrastructural study of the first cleavage of Xenopus embryos. J Ultrastruct Res 47:433-451.
49. Spiegel E, Spiegel M. 1977. Microvilli in sea urchin eggs. Differences in their formation and type. Exp Cell Res 109:462-466.
50. Vacquier VD. 1968. The connection of blastomeres of sea urchin embryos by filopodia. Exp Cell Res 52:571-581.
51. Vasioukhin V, Bauer C, Yin M, Fuchs E. 2000. Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell 100:209-219.