Automated classification of textual documents based on a controlled vocabulary in engineering

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 247-263

  Golub, Koraljka ^a   Hamon, Thierry ^b   Ardö, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749147976     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2007-4-247     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aitchinson, Jean, Gilchrist, Alan, Bawden, David. 2000. Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual, 4th ed., Aslib, London.
2. Aubin, Sophie, and Hamon, Thierry. 2006. Improving term extraction with terminological resources. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on NLP, Fin TAL, pp. 380-387.
3. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX lexical database, release 2, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. [CD-ROM].
4. Bang, Sun Lee, Yang, Jae Dong, and Yang, Hyung Jeong. 2006. Hierarchical document categorization with k-NN and concept-based thesauri. Information processing and management 42: 387-406.
5. Chen, Hao, and Dumais, Susan.T. 2000. Bringing order to the web: automatically categorizing search results. In T. Turner and G. Szwillus, eds., CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 145-152.
6. Engineering Information. 2006. Compendex, Engineering Information, Elsevier, available at: http:// www.ei.org/databases/compendex.html (accessed 30 June 2006). engineering/ (accessed 30 August 2007).
7. Fellbaum, Christiane. 1998. WordNet: an electronic lexical database, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Golub, Koraljka. 2006a. Automated subject classification of textual web documents. Journal of documentation 62: 350-71.
9. Golub, Koraljka. 2006b. Automated subject classification of textual web pages, based on a controlled vocabulary: challenges and recommendations. New review of hypermedia and multimedia 12: 11-27.
10. Golub, Koraljka. 2006c. The role of different thesauri terms in automated subject classification of text. In T. Nishida, ed., 2006IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2006 Main Conference Proceedings) (WI '06): Proceedings: 18-22 December 2006, Hong Kong, China. Los Alamitos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society, 961-65.
11. Hamon, Thierry, Nazarenko, Adeline. 2001. Detection of synonymy links between terms: experiment and results. Recent advances in computational terminology, ed. Didier Bourigault et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185-208.
12. International Standards Organization. 1985. Documentation-methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting index terms: ISO 5963, Geneva, ISO.
13. Intute Consortium. 2006. Intute: science, engineering and technology - engineering, available at: http:// www.intute.ac.uk/sciences/ (accessed 30 August 2007).
14. Jacquemin, Christian. 1996. A symbolic and surgical acquisition of terms through variation. Connectionist, statistical and symbolic approaches to learning for natural language processing, ed. Stefan Wermter et al. Berlin: Springer, pp. 425-38.
15. Jain, Anil K., Murty, M. Narasimha, and Flynn, Patrick J. 1999. Data clustering: a review. ACM Computing Surveys 31: 264-323.
16. Koch, Traugott, and Ardö, Anders. 2000. Automatic classification. DESIRE II D3.6a, Overview of results), available at: http://www.it.lth. se/knowlib/ DESIRE36a-WP2.html (accessed 29 November 2007).
17. Lancaster, F.W. 2003. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice, 3rd ed, Facet, London.
18. Lewis, David D., Yang, Yiming, Rose, Tony G., and Li, Fan. 2004. RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. The journal of machine learning research 5: 361-97.
19. Markey, Karen. 1984. Interindexer consistency tests: a literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials. Library & information science research 6: 155-77.
20. Medelyan, Olena, and Witten, Ian H. 2006. Thesaurus based automatic keyphrase indexing. In Gary Marchionini, Michael L. Nelson, and Cathy Marshall, eds., 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2006: Opening Information Horizons. New York: ACM Press, 296-97.
21. Milstead, Jessica L. ed. 1995. Ei thesaurus, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Engineering Information Inc.
22. Olson, Hope A., and Boll, John J. 2001. Subject analysis in online catalogs, 2nd ed., Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO.
23. Onix text retrieval toolkit: Stop word list 1. available at: http://www.lextek.com/manuals/onix/stopwords1.html (accessed 29 November 2007).
24. Porter, Martin F. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14 no. 3: 130-37.
25. Saltón, Gerard, and McGill, Michael J. 1983. Introduction to modern information retrieval, McGraw-Hill, Auckland.
26. Sebastiani, Fabrizio. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM computing surveys 34: 1-47.
27. Svenonius, Elaine. 1997. Definitional approaches in the design of classification and thesauri and their implications for retrieval and for automatic classification. In I.C. McIlwaine, ed., Knowledge organization for information retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research held at University College London, 16-18 June 1997. The Hague: International Federation for Information Documentation, 12-16.
28. Svenonius, Elaine. 2000. The intellectual foundations of information organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Thunderstone. 2005. Th under stone's Web Site Catalog, available at: http://search.thunderstone.com/ texis/websearch (accessed 29 November 2007).
30. WordNet, "WordNet Search", available at: http:// wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn (accessed 29 November 2007).
31. Yang, Yiming. 1999. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Journal of information retrieval 1: 67-88.