Comparison of recirculation configurations for biological nutrient removal in a membrane bioreactor

Water Research

Volumn 42, Issue 6-7, 2008, Pages 1651-1663

  Bekir Ersu, Cagatayhan ^a   Ong, Say Kee ^b   Arslankaya, Ertan ^c   Brown, Patrick ^b  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^c YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Denitrification; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Phosphorus uptake; Recirculation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; FLOW RATE; PHOSPHORUS;

MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE;

NUTRIENTS;

NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; FLOW RATE; NUTRIENTS; PHOSPHORUS;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GROWTH RATE; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DENITRIFICATION; EFFLUENT; FLOW RATE; GROWTH RATE; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NUTRIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER;

EID: 40749137819     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Adam C., Kraume M., Gnirss R., and Lesjean B. Membrane bioreactor configurations for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 3 5-6 (2003) 237-244
2. APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed (1998), American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA
3. Chaize S., and Huyard A. Membrane bioreactor on domestic wastewater treatment sludge production and modeling approach. Water Sci. Technol. 23 7-9 (1991) 1591-1600
4. Chiemchaisri C., Yamamoto K., and Vigneswaran S. Household membrane bioreactor in domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 27 1 (1993) 171-178
5. Crawford, G., Thompson, D., Lozier, J., Daigger, G., Fleischer, E., 2000. Membrane bioreactors-a designer's perspective. In: CD-ROM Proceedings of WEFTEC 73rd Annual Conference and Exposition, October 14-18, 2000, Anaheim, CA.
6. Huang X., Gui P., and Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 36 (2001) 1001-1006
7. Kolega M., Grohmann G.S., Chiew R.F., and Day A.W. Disinfection and clarification of treated sewage by advanced microfiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 23 7-9 (1991) 1609-1618
8. Langlais B., Denis P., Triballeau S., Faivre M., and Bourbigot M.M. Test on microfiltration as a tertiary treatment downstream of fixed bacteria filtration. Water Sci. Technol. 25 10 (1992) 219-230
9. Macomber J., Cicek N., Suidan M.T., Davel J., Ginestet P., and Audic J.M. Biological kinetic data evaluation of an activated sludge system coupled with an ultrafiltration membrane. J. Environ. Eng. 131 4 (2005) 579-586
10. Metcalf and Eddy. Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. third ed (1991), McGraw Hill, Inc., New York
11. Pouet M.F., Grasmick A., Homer F., Nauleau F., and Cornier J.C. Tertiary treatment of urban wastewater by cross flow microfiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 30 4 (1994) 133-139
12. Sillen L.G. Oxidation states of earth's ocean and atmosphere: a model calculation on earlier state: the myth of prebiotic soup. Archiv. Kemi. Acta 24 (1965) 431-456
13. Stephenson T., Judd S., Jefferson B., and Brindle K. Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment (2000), IWA Publishing, London
14. Visvanathan C., Ben Aim R., and Parameshwaran K. Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 1 (2000) 1-48
15. Zhang B., Yamamoto K., Ohgaki S., and Kamiko N. Floc size distribution and bacterial activities in membrane separation activated mixed liquor processes for small-scale wastewater treatment/remediation. Water Sci. Technol. 35 6 (1997) 37-44