Implementing academic detailing for breast cancer screening in underserved communities

Implementation Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld ^a,b,c   Ashford, Alfred R ^c,d,e   Lantigua, Rafael ^c,e   Desai, Manisha ^b,c   Troxel, Andrea ^f   Gemson, Donald ^g  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center ^*  (United States)

^c NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^d HARLEM HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^g NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749137007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-43     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2005-2006. American Cancer Society, Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc
2. Quick Stats: Percentage of women who reported ever having a mammogram. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003 National Health Interview Survey, MMWR 2005 54 18
3. State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ preview/mmwrhtml/ss4902a1.htm Accessed May 10, 2007
4. Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status - 35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MMWR 2005 54 981 85 http://www.cdc/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5439a2.htm Accessed June 12, 2007 16208309
5. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-National Cancer Institute. LAG Ries MP Eisner CL Kosary BF Hankey BA Miller L Clegg A Mariotto EJ Feuer BK Edwards (Eds), Bethesda, MD 2004 http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2001/ Accessed November 13, 2007
6. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. EG Stone SC Morton ME Hulscher MA Maglione EA Roth JM Grimshaw BS Mittman LV Rubenstein LZ Rubenstein PG Shekelle, Ann Int Med 2002 136 641 51 11992299
7. The community guide: guide to community preventive services, systematic reviews and evidence based recommendations. Improving the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Task Force on Community Preventive Services, http://www.thecommunityguide.org/cancer/screening/default.htm Accessed May 5, 2007
8. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. J Legler HI Meissner C Coyne N Breen V Chollette BK Rimer, Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2002 11 1 59 71
9. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: a meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. JS Mandelblatt KR Yabroff, Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 1999 8 9 759 767
10. Effectiveness of Academic Detailing on Breast Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Physicians in an Underserved Community. S Sheinfeld Gorin A Ashford R Lantigua A Hossain M Desai A Troxel D Gemson, J Am Board Fam Med 2006 19 110 21 16513899
11. Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. MEJL Hulscher M Wensing T van der Weijden R Grol, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002 2
12. Gemson, Patricia Carney. Office System Interventions Supporting Primary Care-Based Health Behavior Change Counseling. L Dickey Larry H Donald, Am J Prev Med 1999 17 299 308 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00083-5 10606199
13. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. SM Austin EA Balas JA Mitchell BG Ewigman, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994 121 124 7949904
14. A model of stage of change to recommend colonoscopy among urban primary care physicians. K Honda S Sheinfeld Gorin, Health Psychol 2006 25 65 73 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.65 16448299
15. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. I Azjen M Fishbein, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall 1980
16. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. A Bandura, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1986
17. Results from CMA's huge 1998 physician survey point to a dispirited profession. P Sullivan L Buske, CMAJ 1998 159 525 528 9757182
18. Impact of differential response rates on the quality of data collected in the CTS physician survey. JA Schoenman ML Berk JJ Feldman A Singer, Eval Health Profess 2003 26 23 42 10.1177/0163278702250077
19. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. NP Gordon RA Hiatt DI Lampert, JNCI 1993 85 566 70 10.1093/jnci/85.7.566 8455203
20. Innovation use: performance assessment in a community mental health center. SN Sheinfeld Gorin TW Weirich, Human Rel 1995 48 1427 53 10.1177/001872679504801203
21. Put Prevention into Practice. CDC, http://www.os.dhhs.gov:81/PPIP/ Accessed July 30, 2007 http://www.emerson.edu
22. Put prevention into practice: a systematic approach. HM Griffith L Dickey DB Kamerow, L Public Health Management Pract 1995 1 9 15
23. Academic detailing: A model for in-office CME. MB Daly M Balshem C Sands J James S Workman PF Engstrom, J Cancer Educ 1993 8 273 80 8186079
24. Disseminating colorectal cancer screening guidelines to primary care physicians in underserved communities. S Sheinfeld Gorin New York Physicians Against Cancer (NYPAC), Presentation to the Society for Behavioral Medicine 2005
25. Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among veterans. MS Wolf KA Fitzner EF Powell KR McCaffrey AS Pickard JM McKoy J Lindenberg GT Schumock KR Carson MR Ferreira NC Dolan CL Bennett, J Clin Oncol 2005 23 8877 8883 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6278 16314648
26. Contexts for Health Promotion. A Gorin S Sheinfeld Gorin, Health Promotion in Practice San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Sheinfeld Gorin S, Arnold J, 2006 67 123
27. Community Tracking Community Tracking Study. Center for studying health system change, 2003 http://www.hschange.com Accessed June 12, 2007
28. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. SM Shortell CL Bennett GR Byck, Milbank Q 1998 76 593 624, 510. 10.1111/1468-0009.00107 9879304
29. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement. AM Audet MM Doty J Shamasdin SC Schoenbaum, Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 24 843 53 10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.843 15886180
30. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Physicians' EHR adoption is slowed by a reimbursement system that rewards the volume of services more than it does their quality. RH Miller C West TM Brown I Sim C Ganchoff, Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 24 1127 37 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1127 16162555
31. Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings. RE Myers B Turner D Weinberg WW Hauck T Hyslop T Brigham T Rothermel J Grana N Schlackman, Prev Med 2001 33 249 60 10.1006/pmed.2001.0878 11570828
32. Improving colorectal cancer screening rates in a managed are health plan: recruitment of provider organizations for a randomized effectiveness trial. PA Ganz MM Farmer M Belman JL Malin R Bastani KL Kahn A Dietrich J Fielding, Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2003 12 9 824 829
33. Educational outreach (academic detailing) regarding osteoporosis in primary care. JM Polinski MA Brookhart JN Katz M Arnold J Kristeller D Trombetta Doyle ME Taddum MJ Golomb DH Solomon, Pharmacoepid Drug Safety 2005 14 843 850 10.1002/pds.1120
34. An overview of current practices of Academic Detailing in Australia and internationally. CA Silagy FW May, Australian Commonwealth Department of Health, Canberra 1997
35. An assessment of academic detailing in North Vancouver. A Nguyen H Roelants P McCrea S Lonie M Maclure J Blocka, Paper presented at the Association of Canadian Medical Colleges-Association of Canadian Academic Healthcare Organizations- Canadian Association for Medical Education Annual Meeting, 2002 Calgary, Alberta, Canada
36. Pilot study on the feasibility and acceptability of academic detailing in general practice. H Habraken I Janssens K Soenen M van Driel J Lannoy M Bogaert, Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2003 59 253 260 10.1007/s00228-003-0602-6 12761604
37. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. SS Coughlin RJ Uhler JK Bobo L Caplan, Cancer Causes Control 2004 15 159 170 10.1023/B:CACO.0000019496.30145.62 15017128
38. Risk factors for excess mortality in Harlem. Findings from the Harlem Household Survey. RF Fullilove ME Fullilove ME Northridge ML Ganz MT Bassett DE McLean AA Aidala DH Gemson C McCord, Am J Prev Med 1999 16 22 28 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00146-9 10198677
39. The breast cancer wars: hope, fear and the pursuit of a cure in twentieth century America. BH Lerner, NY: Oxford University Press 2001
40. Mammography screening for women ages 40-49. RD Klausner, Statement before the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies. February 5, 1997 http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov Accessed January 30, 2007