Internal distraction osteogenesis in mandibular reconstruction: Clinical experience in 10 cases

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 563-575

  González Garcia, Raúl ^a,b   Rubio Bueno, Pilar ^a   Naval Gías, Luis ^a   Rodríguez Campo, Francisco J ^a   Escorial Hernández, Verónica ^a   Martos, Pedro L ^a   Muñoz Guerra, Mario F ^a   Sastre Pérez, Jesús ^a   Gil Diez Usandizaga, José L ^a   Diaz González, Francisco J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE LA PRINCESA   (Spain)

^b NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; JAW MALFORMATION; MALE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; METASTASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELAPSE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBLE TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PLASTIC SURGERY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBULAR NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 40749114016     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000297640.65255.70     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ilizarov, G. A. Basic principle of transosseous compression and distraction osteogenesis. Ortop. Traumatol. Protez. 32: 7, 1971.
2. Ilizarov, G. A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin. Orthop. 238: 249, 1989.
3. Ilizaroz, G. A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin. Orthop. 239: 263, 1989.
4. McCarthy, J. G., Schreiber, J., Karp, N., Thorne, C. H., and Grayson, B. H. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 89: 1, 1992.
5. Constantino, P. D., Shybut, G., Friedman, C. D., et al. Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis: An experimental study. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116: 535, 1990.
6. Munoz-Guerra, M. F., Naval-Gias, L., Campo, F. R., and Perez, J. S. Marginal and segmental mandibulectomy in patients with oral cancer: A statistical analysis of 106 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 61: 1289, 2003.
7. Munoz-Guerra, M. F., Gias, L. N., Rodriguez Campo, F. J., and Díaz-González, F. J. Vascularized free fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction: A report of 26 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59: 140, 2001.
8. Guerra, M. F., Gías, L. N., Campo, F. J., Perez, J. S., de Artinano, F. O., and Gonzalez, F. J. The partial double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft: A solution for long mandibular defects. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 1902, 2000.
9. Block, M. S., Otten, J., McLaurin, D., and Zoldos, J. Bifocal distraction osteogenesis for mandibular defect healing: Case reports. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54: 1365, 1996.
10. Sawaki, Y., Hagino, H., Yamamoto, H., and Ueda, M. Trifocal distraction osteogenesis for segmental mandibular defect: A technical innovation. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 25: 310, 1997.
11. Shvyrkov, M. B., Shamsudinov, A. Kh., Sumarokov, D. D., and Shvyrkova, I. I. Non-free osteoplasty of the mandible in maxillofacial gunshot wounds: Mandibular reconstruction by compression-osteodistraction. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 37: 261, 1999.
12. Annino, D. J., Goguen, L. A., and Karmody, C. S. Distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120: 911, 1994.
13. Oda, T., Sawaki, Y., Fukuta, K., and Ueda, M. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by distraction osteogenesis under skin flaps. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 27: 9, 1998.
14. Jonsson, B., and Siemssen, S. J. Arced segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 1925, 1998.
15. Rubio-Bueno, P., Naval-Gías, L., Rodríguez-Campo, F. J., Gil-Díez, J. L., and Díaz-González, F. J. Internal distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects: Preliminary clinical experience in five cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 63: 598, 2005.
16. Karaharju, T., Karaharju, E. D., and Ranta, R. Mandibulardistraction: An experimental study in sheep. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 18: 280, 1990.
17. Karp, N. S., Thorne, C. H. M., McCarthy, J. G., et al. Base lengthening in the craniofacial skeleton. Am. Plast. Surg. 24: 231, 1990.
18. Kuriakose, M. A., Shnayder, Y., and DeLacure, M. D. Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defect by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck 25: 816, 2003.
19. Herford, A. S. Use of a plate-guided distraction device for transport distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 62: 412, 2004.
20. Holmes, S. B., Lloyd, T., Coghlan, K., et al. Distraction osteogenesis in the mandible in the previously irradiated patient. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 60: 305, 2002.
21. Gantous, A., Phillips, J. H., Catton, P., and Holmberg, D. Distraction osteogenesis in the irradiated mandible. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 93: 164, 1994.
22. Rubio-Bueno, P., Villa, E., Carreño, A., et al. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Special attention to treatment planning. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 29: 254, 2001.
23. Rubio-Bueno, P., Sanromán, F., García, P., et al. Experimental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis with submerged devices: Preliminary results of a canine model. J. Craniofac. Surg. 13: 224, 2002.