Attractor landscapes and active tracking: The neurodynamics of embodied action

Adaptive Behavior

Volumn 16, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 196-216

  Negrello, Mario ^a   Pasemann, Frank ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IAIS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active tracking; Chaos; Cognition; Dynamical systems; Neurodynamics; Recurrent neural networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749103326     PISSN: 10597123     EISSN: 17412633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059712308090200     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Banerjee, A. (2001). The roles played by external input and synaptic modulations in the dynamics of neuronal systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5). 811 - 812.
2. Beer, R. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent- environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72 (1). 173 - 215.
3. Beer, R.D. (2006). Parameter space structure of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 18, 3009 - 3051.
4. Beer, R. (2008). Beyond control: The dynamics of brain-body- environment interaction in motor systems. In D. Sternad (Ed.), Progress in motor control: A multidisciplinary perspective. Berlin: Springer.
5. Beer, R., & Gallagher, J. (1992). Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 1 (1). 91 - 122.
6. Berry, H., & Quoy, M. (2006). Structure and dynamics of random recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 14 (2). 129 - 137.
7. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1). 7 - 19.
8. Dieckmann, U. (1995). Coevolution as an autonomous learning strategy for neuromodules. In H. J. Herrmann, D. Wolf, & E. Pppel (Eds.), Supercomputing in brain research: From tomography to neural networks (pp. 427 - 432). Singapore: World Scientific.
9. Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Freeman, W. (1995). Society of brains: A study in the neuro-science of love and hate. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377 - 442.
12. Harvey, I., Di Paolo, E., Wood, R., Quinn, M., & Tuci, E. (2005). Evolutionary robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artificial Life, 11 (1 - 2). 79 - 98.
13. Haugeland, J. (1995). Mind embodied and embedded. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 58, 233 - 267.
14. Huelse, M., Wischmann, S., & Pasemann, F. (2004). Structure and function of evolved neuro-controllers for autonomous robots. Connection Science, 16 (4). 249 - 266.
15. Husbands, P., Harvey, I., & Cliff, D. (1993). Analysing recurrent dynamical networks evolved for robot control. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEE International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN93) (pp. 158-162). London: IEE Press.
16. Ikegami, T., & Tani, J. (2001). Chaotic itinerancy needs embodied cognition to explain memory dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5). 818 - 819.
17. Ijspeert, A.J., Nakanishi, J., & Schaal, S. (2003). Learning attractor landscapes for learning motor primitives. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Jaegger, H., Maas, W., & Markram, H. (2007). 2007 special issue: Echo state networks and liquid state machines. Neural Networks, 20 (3). 290 - 297.
19. Kaneko, K. (1990). Clustering, coding, switching, hierarchical ordering, and control in network of chaotic elements. Physica D, 41, 137 - 172.
20. Kaneko, K., & Tsuda, I. (2003). Chaotic itinerancy. Chaos, 13 (3). 926 - 936.
21. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). The structure of behavior. London: Methuen.
22. Molter, C., Salihoglu, U., & Bersini, H. (2007). The road to chaos by time-asymmetric Hebbian learning in recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 19, 80 - 110.
23. Negrello, M., & Pasemann, F. (2008). Adaptive neurodynamics. In Y. Shan & A. Yang (Eds.), Applications of complex adaptive systems. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
24. Pasemann, F. (1995). Neuromodules: A dynamical systems approach to brain modelling. In H. J. Herrmann, D. Wolf, & E. Pppel (Eds.), Supercomputing in brain research: From tomography to neural networks (pp. 331 - 347). Singapore: World Scientific.
25. Pasemann, F. (2002). Complex dynamics and the structure of small neural networks. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 13 (2). 195 - 216.
26. Pasemann, F., Steinmetz, U., Hlse, M., & Lara, B. (2001). Robot control and the evolution of modular neurodynamics. Theory in Biosciences, 120, 311 - 326.
27. Philipona, D., O'Regan, J.K., Nadal, J.-P., & Coenen, O.J.-M.D. (2003). Perception of the structure of the physical world using unknown multimodal sensors and effectors. In S. Thrun, L. K. Saul, & B. Schlkopf (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Sterelny, K. (2005). Thought in a hostile world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Tani, J. (1998). An interpretation of the "self" from the dynamical systems perspective: A constructivist approach. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5 (5 - 6). 516 - 542.
31. Tsuda, I. (1991). Chaotic itinerancy as a dynamical basis of hermeneutics in brain and mind. In Microcomputers and attention. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
32. Tsuda, I. (2001). Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dynamical systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 793 - 847.
33. Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. von Holst, V.E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das reafferenzprinzip (wechselwirkung zwischen zentralnervensystem und peripherie). Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464 - 476.
35. Watson, R.A., & Pollack, J.B. (2005). Modular interdependency in complex dynamical systems. Artificial Life, 11 (4). 445 - 457.