Chemoreception in the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis: An electrophysiology approach

Diseases of Aquatic Organisms

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 161-168

  Fields, D M ^a,b   Weissburg, M J ^c   Browman, H I ^b  

^a BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENCES   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Host finding; Lepeophtheirus salmonis; Olfaction

Indexed keywords

CHEMORECEPTION; HOST SPECIFICITY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; LOUSE; OLFACTION; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SALMONID;

LEPEOPHTHEIRUS SALMONIS; PHTHIRAPTERA;

SEA WATER;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHEMISTRY; CHEMORECEPTOR; COPEPOD; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; FISH DISEASE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INFESTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SALMON; TIME;

ANIMALS; CHEMORECEPTORS; COPEPODA; CUES; ECTOPARASITIC INFESTATIONS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; FISH DISEASES; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MALE; NEURONS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SALMON; SEAWATER; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 40749091700     PISSN: 01775103     EISSN: 16161580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/dao01870     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Atema J (1995) Chemical signals in the marine-environment - dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:62-66
2. Bagøien E, Kiørboe T (2005) Blind dating - mate finding in planktonic copepods. I. Tracking the pheromone trail of Centropages typicus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300:105-115
3. Bailey RJE, Birkett MA, Ingvarsdóttir A, Mordue (Luntz) AJ, Mordue W, O'Shea B, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ (2006) The role of semiochemicals in host location and non-host avoidance by salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) copepodids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:448-456
4. Baker TC, Cardé RT (1977) Disruption of gypsy moth male sex pheromone behaviour by high frequency sound. Environ Entomol 7:45-52
5. Beamish RJ, Neville CM, Sweeting RM, Ambers N (2005) Sea lice on adult Pacific salmon in the coastal waters of Central British Columbia, Canada. Fish Res 76:198-208
6. Bron JE, Sommerville C, Rae GH (1993) Aspects of the behaviour of copepodid larvae of the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1837). In: Boxshall GA, Defaye D (eds) Pathogens of wild and farmed fish: sea lice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, p 125-142
7. Buchmann K, Bresciani J (1997) Microenvironment of Gyrodactylus derjavini on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: association between mucous cell density in skin and site selection. Parasitol Res 84:17-23
8. Buchmann K, Nielsen ME (1999) Chemoattraction of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ciliophora) theronts to host molecules. Int J Parasitol 29:1415-1423
9. Carr WES (1978) Chemoreception in the shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio, the role of amino acids and betaine in elicitation of feeding responses by extracts. Comp Biochem Physiol 61:127-131
10. Carr WES, Derby CD (1986) Behavioral chemoattractants for the shrimp, Palaemontes pugio: identification of active components in food extracts and evidence of synergistic mixture interactions. Chem Senses 11:49-64
11. Costello MJ (2006) Ecology of sea lice parasitic on farmed and wild fish. Trends Parasitol 22:475-483
12. Cowles TJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW (1988) Food selection by copepods: discrimination on the basis of food quality. Mar Biol 100:41-49
13. Derby CD, Atema J (1982) The function of chemo- and mechanoreceptors in lobster (Homarus americanus) feeding behavior. J Exp Biol 98:317-327
14. Derby CD, Atema J (1988) Chemoreceptor cells in aquatic invertebrates: peripheral mechanisms of chemical signal processing in decapod crustaceans. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 365-385
15. Derby CD, Stuellet P (2001) Why do animals have so many receptors? The role of multiple chemosensors in animal perception. Biol Bull 200:211-215
16. Devine GJ, Ingvarsdottir A, Mordue W, Pike AW, Pickett J, Duce I, Mordue AJ (2000) Salmon lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, exhibit specific chemotactic responses to semio-chemicals originating from the salmonid, Salmo salar. J Chem Ecol 26:1833-1847
17. Doall MH, Colin SP, Strickler JR, Yen J (1998) Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 353:681-689
18. Fields DM, Yen J (2002) Fluid mechanosensory stimulation of behavior from a planktonic marine copepod Euchaeta rimana Bradford. J Plankton Res 24:747-755
19. Fields DM, Shaeffer DS, Weissburg MJ (2002) Mechanical and neural responses from the mechanosensory hairs on the antennule of Gaussia princeps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:173-186
20. Finstad B, Bjørn PA, Grimnes A, Hvidsten NA (2000) Laboratory and field investigations of salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis, Krøyer) infestation on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) post-smolts. Aquacult Res 31:795-803
21. Flamarique IN, Browman HI, Bélanger M, Boxaspen K (2000) Ontogenetic changes in visual responses of the parasitic salmon louse, Lepeoptheirus salmonis. J Exp Biol 203:1649-1657
22. Garm A, Hallberg E, Høeg JT (2003) Role of maxilla 2 and its setae during feeding in the shrimp Palaemon adspersus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Biol Bull 204:126-137
23. Gresty KA, Boxshall GA, Nagasawa K (1993) Antennulary sensors of the infective copepod larva of the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae). In: Boxshall GA, Defaye D (eds) Pathogens of wild and farmed fish: sea lice. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, p 83-98
24. Haas W (2003) Parasitic worms: strategies of host finding, recognition and invasion. Zoology 106:349-364
25. Haas W, Stiegeler P, Keating A, Kullmann B, Rabenau H, Schonamsgruber E, Haberl B (2002) Diplostomum spathaceum cercariae respond to a unique profile of cues during recognition of their fish host. Int J Parasitol 32:1145-1154
26. Heuch PA, Karlsen HE (1997) Detection of infrasonic water oscillations by copepodids of Lepeophtheirus salmonis. (Copepoda: Caligida). J Plankton Res 19:735-747
27. Heuch PA, Doall M, Yen J (2007) Water flow around a fish mimic attracts a parasitic and deters a planktonic cope-pod. J Plankton Res 29:3-16
28. Hilborn R (2006) Salmon-farming impacts on wild salmon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15277
29. Ingvarsdóttir A, Birkett MA, Duce I, Mordue W, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Mordue (Luntz) AJ (2002a) Role of semio-chemicals in mate location by parasitic salmon louse. Lepeophtheirus salmonis. J Chem Ecol 28:2107-2117
30. Ingvarsdóttir A, Birkett MA, Duce I, Genna RL, Mordue W, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Mordue (Luntz) AJ (2002b) Semiochemical strategies for sea louse control: host location cues. Pest Manag Sci 58:537-545
31. Johnson SC, Albright LJ (1991) The development stages of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kreyer, 1837) (Copepoda: Caligidae). Can J Zool 69:929-950
32. Krkosek M, Lewis MA, Morton A, Frazer LN, Volpe JP (2006) Epizootics of wild fish induced by farm fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15506-15510
33. Luntz AJM (2003) Arthropod semiochemicals: mosquitoes, midges and sealice. Biochem Soc Trans 31:128-133
34. McClintock JB, Baker BJ (1997) A review of the chemical ecology of Antarctic marine invertebrates. Am Zool 37:329-342
35. Mikheev VN, Pasternak AF, Valtonen ET (2003) How do fish ectoparasites Argulus spp. (Crustacea: Branchiura) match with their hosts at the behavioural and ecological scales? Zh Obshch Biol 64:238-247
36. Mikheev VN, Pasternak AF, Valtonen ET (2004) Tuning host specificity during the ontogeny of a fish ectoparasite: behavioural responses to host-induced cues. Parasitol Res 92:220-224
37. Okubo A, Armstrong RA, Yen J (2001) Diffusion of 'smell' and 'taste': chemical communication. In: Okubo A, Levin SA (eds) Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 107-126
38. Pike AW, Wadsworth SL (1999) Sea lice on salmonids: their biology and control. Adv Parasitol 44:234-337
39. Poulet SA, Ouellet G (1982) The role of amino acids in the chemosensory swarming and feeding of marine copepods. J Plankton Res 4:341-361
40. Poulin R (1998) Evolutionary ecology of parasites. From individuals to communites. Chapman & Hall, London
41. Quirt J, Lasenby D (2002) Cannibalism and ontogenetic changes in the response of the freshwater shrimp Mysis relicta to chemical cues from conspecific predators. Can J Zool 80:1022-1025
42. Ritchie G (1997) The host transfer ability of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae) from farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. J Fish Dis 20:153-157
43. Vickers NJ (2000) Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. Biol Bull 198:203-212
44. Wahl CM, Mills EL, McFarland WN, DeGisi JS (1993) Ontogenetic changes in prey selection and visual acuity of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:743-749
45. Weissburg MJ (1997) Chemo- and mechanosensory orientation by crustaceans in laminar and turbulent flows: from odor trails to vortex streets. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhauser Verlag, New York, p 215-246
46. Weissburg MJ, Zimmer-Faust RK (1991) Ontogeny versus phylogeny in determining patterns of chemosensory-mediated behavior: initial studies with fiddler crabs. Biol Bull 181:205-215
47. Weissburg MJ, Ferner MC, Pisut DP, Smee DL (2002) Ecological consequences chemically-mediated prey perception. J Chem Ecol 28:1953-1957
48. Woodson CB, Webster DR, Weissburg MJ, Yen J (2005) Response of copepods to physical gradients associated with structure in the ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1552-1564
49. Wootten R, Smith JW, Needham EA (1982) Aspects of the biology of the parasitic copepods Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongatus on farmed salmonids and their treatment. Proc R Soc Edinb 81:185-197
50. Yen J, Okubo A (2002) Particle and prey detection by mechanoreceptive copepods: a mathematical analysis. Hydrobiologia 480:165-173
51. Zimmer RK, Butman CA (2000) Chemical signalling processes in the marine environment. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 198:168-187
52. Zimmer-Faust RK, Michel WC, Tyre JE, Case JF (1984) Chemical induction of feeding in California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus (Randall). J Chem Ecol 10:957-971