Current methods in forensic speaker identification: Results of a collaborative exercise

International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-243

  Cambier Langeveld, Tina ^a  

^a Ministerie van Justitie   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acoustic measurements; Collaborative exercise; Methodology; Proficiency test; Scale of conclusions; Speaker identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749086298     PISSN: 17488885     EISSN: 17488893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.2007.14.2.223     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chambers, J. K. (1973) Canadian raising. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18:113-135.
2. Champod, C., Evett, I. W and Kuchler, B. (2001) Earmarks as evidence: a critical review. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46(6): 1275-1284.
3. Champod, C. and Mieuwly, D. (2000) The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition. Speech Communication 31:193-203.
4. Evett, I. W. (1995) Avoiding the transposed conditional. Science & Justice 35(2): 127-131.
5. Evett, I. W. (1998) Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Science & Justice 38(3): 198-202.
6. Evett, I. W and Williams, R. L. (1996) A review of the sixteen points fingerprint standard in England and Wales. Journal of Forensic Identification 46(1): 49-73.
7. Jessen, M. (2004) Conference report: annual meeting of the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. Helsinki, 28-31 July. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11(2): 278-292.
8. Nolan, F. (2001) Speaker identification evidence: its forms, limitations, and roles. Proceedings of the Conference Law and Language: prospect and retrospect. 12-15 December, Levi (Finnish Lapland).
9. Przybocki, M. and Martin, A. (2004) NIST Speaker recognition evaluation chronicles. Proceedings of Odyssey04. The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop 15-22.
10. Risinger, D. M. and Saks, M. J. (1996) Science and nonscience in the courts: Daubert meets handwriting identification expertise. Iowa Law Review 82: 21-74.
11. Rose, P. (2004) Technical forensic speaker identification from a bayesian linguist's perspective. Proceedings of Odyssey04, The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop 3-10.
12. Van Leeuwen, D. and Bouten, J. S. (2004) Results of the 2003 NFI-TNO forensic speaker recognition evaluation. Proceedings of Odyssey04, The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop 75-82.