ANASE: Measuring aircraft noise annoyance very unreliably

Significance

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 18-24

  Brooker, Peter ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40649110129     PISSN: 17409705     EISSN: 17409713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2008.00274.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brooker, P. (2004) The UK Aircraft Noise Index Study [ANIS]: 20 years on. Acoustics Bulletin, May/June, 10-16. (Available from https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/1004.).
2. Brooker, P., Critchley, J. B., Monkman, D. J. and Richmond, C. (1985) United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study (ANIS): Main report. DR Report 8402, for the Civil Aviation Authority on behalf of the Department of Transport, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
3. Havelock, P. and Turner, S. W. (2007) Attitudes to noise from aviation sources in England: Non SP Peer Review. (Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/aviation/environmentalissues/Anase/nonsppeerreview.pdf.).
4. Sudman, S. and Bradburn N. M. (1982) Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Government Social Research Unit (2007) The Magenta Book: Guidance Notes for Policy Evaluation and Analysis. London: HM Treasury. (Available from http://www.policyhub.gov.uk/magenta_book/.).
6. McColl, E., Jacoby, A., Thomas, L., Soutter, J., Bamford, C., Steen, N. et al. (2001) Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technology Assessment, 5. (Available from http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon531.pdf.).
7. Fidell, S. and Silvati, L. (2004) Parsimonious alternative to regression analysis for characterizing prevalence rates of aircraft noise annoyance. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 5, 56-68.