Strong and clitic pronouns in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of French and Italian

Bilingualism

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 19-41

  Schmitz, Katrin ^a   Müller, Natascha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40649107722     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728907003197     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Belletti, A. (1999). Italian/Romance Clitics: Structure and derivation. In van Riemsdijk (ed.), pp. 543-579.
2. Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Cardinaletti, A. (1991). On pronoun movement: The Italian dative loro. Probus, 3 (2), 127-153.
4. Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In van Riemsdijk (ed.), pp. 145-233.
5. Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (2000). Overview: The grammar (and acquisition) of clitics. In Powers & Hamann (eds.), pp. 165-186.
6. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
7. Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Clahsen, H. (ed.) (1996). Generative perspectives on language acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Crysmann, B. & Müller, N. (2000). On the non-parallelism in the acquisition of reflexive and non-reflexive object clitics. In Powers & Hamann (eds.), pp. 207-236.
10. Déchaine, R.-M. & Wiltschko, M. (2002). Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 33 (3), 409-442.
11. Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F. & van der Weijer, J. (eds.) (2000). Optimality theory: Morphology, syntax and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Gabriel, C. & Müller, N. (2005). Zu den romanischen Pronominalklitika: Kategorialer Status und syntaktische Derivation. In Kaiser, G. (ed.), Deutsche Romanistik- generativ, pp. 161-180. Tübingen: Narr.
13. Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. & Tracy, R. (1996). Bilingual bootinvertedstrapping. Linguistics, 34, 901-926.
14. Grondin, N. & White, L. (1996). Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition, 5, 1-34.
15. Hamann, C. (2002). From syntax to discourse: Pronominal clitics, null subjects and infinitives in child language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Hamann, C., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Dubé, S., Frauenfelder, U., Rizzi, L., Starke, M. & Zesiger, P. (2003). Aspects of grammatical development in young French children with SLI. Developmental Science, 6, 151-158.
17. Hamann, C., Rizzi, L. & Frauenfelder, U. (1996). On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In Clahsen (ed.), pp. 309-334.
18. Hulk, A. & Müller, N. (2000). Crosslinguistic influence at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3 (3), 227-244.
19. Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Ok-Kyung, K., Riemer, B. & Rigaut, C. (1996). On the acquisition of the pronominal system in French and German. In A. Springfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 374-385. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
20. Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Riemer, B. & Rigaut, C. (1997). The case of subject and object omissions in French and German. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 331-342. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
21. Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C. & Gérard, Ch.-L. (1998). Determiners and pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113-160.
22. Jakubowicz, C. & Rigaut, C. (2000). L'acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en frana̧is. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 45 (1-2), 119-159.
23. Kato, M. (1999). Strong and weak pronominals in the nullsubject parameter. Probus, 11, 1-37.
24. Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. López, L. (2003). Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica, 57 (3), 193-231.
26. Mac Whinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271-296.
27. Manzini, R. (1986). On Italian SI. In H. Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics, pp. 241-262. New York: Academic Press.
28. Meisel, J. M. (1990). INFL-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement. In J. M. Meisel (ed.), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children (Studies in Language Acquisition 10), pp. 237-298. Dordrecht: Foris.
29. Meisel, J. M. (1997). The acquisition of syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 13, 227-263.
30. Meyer-Lübke, W. (1894). Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen (vol. 2): Formenlehre. Leipzig: Reisland.
31. Müller, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1 (3), 151-171.
32. Müller, N. (2004). Null-arguments in bilingual children: French topics. In J. Paradis & P. Prévost (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories, pp. 275-304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Müller, N., Cantone, K., Kupisch, T. & Schmitz, K. (2002). Zum Spracheneinfluss im bilingualen Erstspracherwerb: Italienisc-Deutsch. Linguistische Berichte, 190, 157-206.
34. Müller, N., Crysmann, B. & Kaiser, G. (1996). Interactions between the acquisition of French object drop and the development of the C-system. Language Acquisition, 5 (1), 35-63.
35. Müller, N. & Hulk, A. (2000). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual children: Object omissions and root infinitives. In C. Howell, S. A. Fish & T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 546-557. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
36. Müller, N. & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (1), 1-21.
37. Müller, N., Kupisch, T., Schmitz, K. & Cantone, K. (2006). Einführung in die Mehrsprachigkeitforschung. Tübingen: Narr.
38. Müller, N. & Penner, Z. (1996). Early subordination: The acquisition of free morphology in French, German, and Swiss German. Linguistics 34, 133-165.
39. Müller, N. & Pillunat, A. (in press). Balanced bilingual children with two weak languages: A French-German case study. To appear in P. Guijarro-Fuentes, P. Larrañaga & J. Clibbens (eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Müller, N., Schmitz, K., Cantone, K. & Kupisch, T. (2006). Null arguments in monolingual children: A comparison of Italian and French. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages, pp. 69-93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Paradis, J., Crago, M. & Genesee, F. (2003). Object clitics as a clinical marker of SLI in French: Evidence from French-English bilingual children. In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (vol. 2), pp. 638-649. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
42. Pillunat, A., Schmitz, K. & Müller, N. (2006). Die Schnittstelle Syntax-Pragmatik: Subjektauslassungen bei bilingual deutsch-französisch aufwachsenden Kindern. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (LiLi), 36 (143), 7-24.
43. Powers, S. M. & Hamann, C. (eds.) (2000). The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
44. Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Raposo, E. (1998). Definite/zero alternations in Portuguese: Towards a unification of topic constructions. In A. Schwegler, B. Tranel & M. Uribe-Etxebarria (eds.), Romance linguistics: Theoretical perspectives, pp. 197-212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.) (1999). Clitics in the languages of Europe Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
47. Roberge, Y. (1991). On the recoverability of null objects. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the XVIIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, pp. 299-312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Ronjat, J. (1913). Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: Champion.
49. Schmitz, K. (2006a). Indirect objects and dative case in monolingual German and bilingual German/Romance language acquisition. In D. Hole, W. Abraham & A. Meinunger (eds.), Datives and other cases, pp. 240-267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Schmitz, K. (2006b). Zweisprachigkeit im Fokus: Der Erwerb der Verben mit zwei Objekten durch bilingual deutschfranzösisch und deutsch-italienisch aufwachsende Kinder. Tübingen: Narr.
51. Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Tesar, B. & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 229-268.
53. Tiedemann, C. (1999). Erwerb des italienischen Pronominalsystems. Master's thesis, University of Hamburg.
54. White, L. (1996). Clitics in L2 French. In Clahsen (ed.), pp. 335-368.
55. Yang, C. D. (1999). A selectionist theory of language acquisition. In ACL anthology, 429-435. http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P99/ P99-1055.pdf (accessed 7 February 2008).
56. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1987). La réflexivité ergative en français moderne. Le Français moderne, 55, 23-54.
57. Zubizarreta, M.-L. (1982). On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Zushi, M. (2003). Null arguments: The case of Japanese and Romance. Lingua, 113, 559-604.