Prediction of permeate flux and counterion binding during cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 318, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 125-133

  Das, Chandan ^a   DasGupta, Sunando ^a   De, Sirshendu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Counterion binding; Flux prediction; Gel concentration; Localized adsorption model; Metal ions

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; BINARY MIXTURES; METAL IONS; SOLUTIONS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

COUNTERION BINDING; FLUX PREDICTION; GEL CONCENTRATION; LOCALIZED ADSORPTION MODEL; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

MICELLES;

ANIONIC SURFACTANT; CALCIUM ION; CATION; COPPER ION; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM;

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); GEL; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; ISOTHERM; MICELLE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERMEABILITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 40649102373     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. R.S. Juang Y.Y. Xu C.L. Chen Separation and removal of metal ions from dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration J. Membr. Sci. 218 2003 257 267
2. S. Akita L.P. Castillo S. Nii K. Takahashi H. Takeuchi Separation of Co(II)/Ni(II) via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using organophosphorus acid extractant solubilized by nonionic surfactant J. Membr. Sci. 162 1999 111 117
3. H. Kim K. Baek J. Lee J. Iqbal J.W. Yang Comparison of separation methods of heavy metal from surfactant micellar solutions for the recovery of surfactant Desalination 191 2006 186 192
4. M.K. Purkait S. DasGupta S. De Simultaneous separation of two oxyanions from their mixture using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration Sep. Sci. Technol. 40 2005 1439 1460
5. K. Baek J.W. Yang Cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of nitrate and chromate: competitive binding J. Hazard. Mater. B108 2004 119 123
6. K. Baek B.K. Kim J.W. Yang Application of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for nutrients removal Desalination 156 2003 137 144
7. J.S. Yang K. Baek J.W. Yang Crossflow ultrafiltration of surfactant solutions Desalination 184 2005 385 394
8. C. Das, P. Maity, S. DasGupta, S. De, Separation of cation–anion mixture using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration in a mixed micellar system, Chem. Eng. J. (2008) doi:10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.006 .
9. S.S. Kulkarni E.W. Funk N.N. Li Theory and mechanistic concepts W.S.W. Ho K.K. Sirkar Membrane Handbook 1992 Chapman & Hall New York 401 402 (Chapter 27)
10. M.C. Porter Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 11 1972 234 248
11. R.W. Field D. Wu J.A. Howell B.B. Gupta Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling J. Membr. Sci. 100 1995 259 272
12. R.O. Dunn Jr. J.F. Scamehorn S.D. Christian Concentration polarization effects in the use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organic pollutants from wastewater Sep. Sci. Technol. 22 1987 763 789
13. R. Urbański E. Goralska H.J. Bart J. Szymanowski Ultrafiltration of surfactant solutions J. Colloid Interface Sci. 253 2002 419 426
14. M.K. Purkait S. DasGupta S. De Resistance in series model for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye J. Colloid Interface Sci. 270 2004 496 506
15. G. Akay R.J. Wakeman Electric field intensification of surfactant mediated separation processes Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 74 1996 517 525
16. J. Lee J.S. Yang H.J. Kim K. Baek J.W. Yang Simultaneous removal of organic and inorganic contaminants by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactant Desalination 184 2005 395 407
17. W. Guo H. Uchiyama E.E. Tucker S.D. Christian J.F. Scamehorn Use of polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes in colloid-enhanced ultrafiltration Colloid Surf. 123–124 1997 695 703
18. M.C. Porter Handbook of Industrial Membrane Technology 2005 Crest Publishing House New Delhi, India p. 171
19. R.W. Baker H. Strathmann Ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions with high-flux membranes J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 14 1970 1197 1214
20. S. Nakao S. Yumato S. Kimura Analysis of rejection characteristics of macromolecular gel layer for low molecular weight solutes in ultrafiltration J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 15 1982 463 468
21. S. Nakao S. Kimura Models of membrane transport phenomena and their applications for ultrafiltration data J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 15 1982 200 205
22. J.F. Rathman J.F. Scamehorn Counterion binding on mixed micelles J. Phys. Chem. 88 1984 5807 5816
23. F.I. Talens P. Patón S. Gaya Micellar flocculation of anionic surfactants Langmuir 14 1998 5046 5050
24. A. Hafiane I. Issid D. Lemordant Counterion binding on micelles: an ultrafiltration study J. Colloid Interface Sci. 142 1991 167 178
25. 3+ Langmuir 17 2001 6059 6064
26. S. Chakraborty B.C. Bag S. DasGupta J.K. Basu S. De Prediction of permeate flux and permeate concentration in nanofiltration of dye solution Sep. Purif. Technol. 35 2004 141 152
27. E.L. Cussler Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems 1998 Cambridge University Press New Delhi, India p.161
28. R.W. Field P. Aimar Ideal limiting fluxes in ultrafiltration: comparison of various theoretical relationships J. Membr. Sci. 80 1993 107 115
29. M.K. Purkait S. DasGupta S. De Separation of aromatic alcohols using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and recovery of surfactant J. Membr. Sci. 250 2005 47 59
30. S.R. Epton A new method for the rapid titrimetric analysis of sodium alkyl sulphates and related compounds Trans. Faraday Soc. 44 1948 226 230
31. J.F. Scamehorn J.H. Harwell Surfactant Based Separation Processes, Surfactant Science Series 1989 Marcel-Dekker Inc. New York
32. J.H. Clint Surfactant Aggregation 1992 Blackie & Son Ltd. London pp. 108–109
33. H. Uchiyama S.D. Christian E.E. Tucker J.F. Scamehorn Solubilization of trichloroethylene by polyelectrolyte/surfactant complexes AIChE J. 40 1994 1969 1975