메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 146-149

Autonomy and negatively informed consent

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT RIGHT; SWEDEN;

EID: 40649086736     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020503     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (24)

References (3)
  • 3
    • 30044438398 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What should we do about it? Implications of the Empirical Evidence in Relation to Comprehension and Acceptability of Randomisation
    • Holm S, Jonas M, eds, The Netherlandsi IOS Press
    • Dawson A. What should we do about it? Implications of the Empirical Evidence in Relation to Comprehension and Acceptability of Randomisation. In: Holm S, Jonas M, (eds.) Engaging the Worfd: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology. The Netherlandsi IOS Press, 2204.
    • Engaging the Worfd: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology , pp. 2204
    • Dawson, A.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.