![]() |
Volumn 10, Issue 47, 2006, Pages
|
Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain
a,b,c
b,c,d
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACUTE ABDOMEN;
ACUTE APPENDICITIS;
ANALYTICAL ERROR;
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK;
BAYES THEOREM;
CHECKLIST;
CLINICAL ALGORITHM;
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL;
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPUTER ANALYSIS;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
DISCRIMINATION RULES;
ECONOMIC EVALUATION;
EXPERT SYSTEM;
FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROTOMY;
LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
MACHINE LEARNING;
META ANALYSIS;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REVIEW;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
UNITED KINGDOM;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
ABDOMINAL PAIN;
ACUTE DISEASE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION TREE;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
FEMALE;
MALE;
PATHOLOGY;
ABDOMINAL PAIN;
ACUTE DISEASE;
BAYES THEOREM;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION TREES;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
|
EID: 40549137517
PISSN: 13665278
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3310/hta10470 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (54)
|
References (314)
|