Pānini's astādhyāyī and linguistic theory

Journal of Indian Philosophy

Volumn 35, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 445-468

  Gillon, Brendan S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40549119134     PISSN: 00221791     EISSN: 15730395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10781-007-9027-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, New York: Holt.
2. Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In: M. Halle, I Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
3. Cardona, G. (1965). On translating and formalizing Pāninian Rules. Journal of the Oriental Institute (Baroda), 14, 306-314.
4. Cardona, G. (1976). Some features of Pāṅinian derivations. In: H. Parret (Ed.), History of linguistic thought and contemporary linguistics (pp. 136-158). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter (Foundations of Communication).
5. Cardona, G. (1988). Pānini: his work and its traditions. Delhi, India: Motilal. Banarsidass.
6. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton and Company (Janua Linguarum: Series Minor n. 4).
7. Chomsky, N. (1980). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherland: Foris Publications.
8. Deshpande, M. (1980). Evolution of Syntactic Theory in Sanskrit Grammar: Syntax of the Sanskrit Infinitive -tumUN. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Karoma Publishers.
9. Deshpande, M. (Ed.), (1999). Indian linguistic studies: festschrift in honour of George Cardona. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass.
10. DiSciullo, A.-M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
11. Filliozat, P.-S. (1988). Grammaire sanskrite Pâninéenne. Paris, France: Picard.
12. Gillon, B. S. (1993). Bharthari's solution to the problem of asamartha compounds. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques, 47(1), 117-133.
13. Gillon, B. S. (1999). Bhartrhari's rule for unexpressed kārakas: the problem of control in Classical Sanskrit. In: Deshpande (Ed.) (1999) pp. 93-111.
14. Harris, Z. (1946). From Morpheme to Utterance. Language, 22, 161-183.
15. Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210-231.
16. Joshi, S. D., & Roodbergen, J. A. F. (Ed.) (tr) (1980). Patan̄jali's Vyākaraṅa Mahābhāsya Vibhaktyahnika. Poona, India: University of Poona (No. 12, Class C).
17. Kiparsky, P. (1982). Some theoretical problems in. Pāṅini's grammar. Poona, India: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
18. Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York, New York: Academic Press.
19. Ogawa, H. (2005). Process and language: A study of the Mahābhāsya ad A1.3.1 bhūvādayo bhātavah. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
20. McCawley, J. D. (1968). Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language, 4, 243-269.
21. Pollard, C., & Sag, J. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Sharma, Rama Nath (tr) (1987). The Aşţādhyā yī of Pānini. 6 vols. Delhi, India: Munishiram Manoharlal.
23. Shefts, B. (1961). Grammatical method in Pāņini: Its treatment of sanskrit present stems. New Haven, USA: American Oriental Society (American Oriental Series: Essay 1).
24. Staal, J. F. (1963). Review of Shefts 1961. Language, 39(3), 483-488. Reprinted In: Staal (Ed) (1988) pp. 232-237.
25. Staal, J. F. (1965). Context sensitive rules in Pāņini. Foundations of Language, 1, 63-72. Reprinted In: Staal (Ed.) (1988) pp. 171-180.
26. Staal, J. F. (1975). The concept of metalanguage and its Indian background. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 3,315-354.
27. Staal, J. F. (Ed.) (1988) Universals: Studies in Indian logic and linguistics. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Van Nooten, B. (1969). Pānini's theory of verbal meaning. Foundations of Language, 5, 242-255.
29. Wells, R. S. (1947). Immediate Constituents. Language, 23, 81-117.